NewsWagg

No such thing as hate speech

Why do I have to always explain basic things to Labour supporters?

I find it interesting how rather than debate most people who are left wing simply post insults. The old saying is when people post insults they have lost the augment. But also I find it interesting they keep there account private as they are so brave.

I love the fact Labour supporters are arguing that a fact is not real. The article is in the guardian dated 1st Jan 2023 clearly stating they want to make the bill much harsher and stop legal speech. But even though the article informs us apparently it does not exist or something. This is an article. You cannot debate it is not real. Labour supporters seem very strange. https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jan/01/labour-pledges-toughen-online-safety-bill

Labour (Shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell) seems to want to end free speech. It seems that Labour if they came to power wish to end free speech. It seems that they wish to end people making online criticism (a troll is often someone who posts criticism). This would mean legal speech would probably be criminal. So if Labour got in and you said that a Labour no was useless (most likely to be the case) then no doubt the police would arrest you (like they used to in the old USSR presumably). Of course then it is a case of who decides what is good or bad speech. Just like in Scotland when a chap got a criminal record for making a joke YouTube vid. Link: https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jan/01/labour-pledges-toughen-online-safety-bill

18 U.S.C. 2257 Record Keeping Requirements. I just thought I would add this as an extra bit of information regarding those who are anti porn pretend that models on pay sites are under aged or trafficked or whatever. If you go to any porn pay site you will find often at the bottom a link that says 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record Keeping Requirements or something like that. It is a USA law that applies to all porn sites even those in the UK and other countries (because payments and hosting is USA based). What it shows is who has the model release and ID’s of the models on the site. As such the authorities can check the details of the models out. So when some anti porn person claims pay sites use under age models or whatever then ask them to name the site and if they reported the site to the police. As one suspects they will not name any site as they hope you believe whatever they tell you without you ever checking a single fact they claim. Any site that did have models under 18 I suspect would be closed in seconds. In truth the payment firms are extremely strict. See also: https://youtu.be/qlbqYrKHRPo

The left believe I should not have a voice or should vote. Nothing changes. They claim to be about looking after all and are kind but then show us they are only about looking after themselves. They want us to vote for something cruel that would give us less rights and freedoms.

My points about the GB News Nana Akua talking to Kellie-Jay about porn behind a paywall. In this I point out that most things Kellie-Jay says is what she thinks rather than facts. Some points: 1. Many times it is I think. That is not evidence. 2. She talks about onlyfans being a problem. Does not say what the problem is. Onlyfans is behind a paywall as you have to join to see anything. As such why mention onlyfans? 3. She claims performers are under age. Name the paysite a that use models under 18 as I suspect zero. Sites have to get model release and consent forms from models. Who are booked often on model websites. 4. She talks about boys going to doctors with erectile problems because of porn. This is new to me. I will have to see what the evidence and numbers are on this. It is possible she just thinks this to be true. 5. She admits age verification may not work. You know because it’s easy to get past and people will probably steal your bank details plus many other problems. 6. She is corrected by Nana Akua who points out that the female pop star felt better because of porn. By the way women watch porn too. It is worth noting that these middle class anti porn people never talk about men in porn such as gay porn. Or indeed mainstream actors who do nude in films. Or nude dancers at ballet. Or art galleries. It is because they do not like working class people to make money. They see working class people as stupid and victims. But if someone middle class goes nude in a film then that is fine and it is art then. Link: https://youtu.be/mnSPICxTaq4

Thought for the day: In 2023 do we still need schools and teachers. The reality is we can put lessons in such as YouTube and allow students to study in there own time. Rather than having to go to a school and having lessons spoiled by the thug who messes around. Not to mention the drugs and alcohol that apparently is now common place in many UK schools that is passed from one student to another. Of course the problem is they may miss out on social skills by not mixing with other students. But then again if they end up smoking on the way home from school perhaps they would be better off doing lessons online. Just a thought for the day.

On YouTube someone posted an anti porn film full of what they believe are facts rather than facts. And naturally lots of feminists with made up facts post nonsense in agreement. One post was about stuff on the dark wed. I have no idea how to get on the dark web. I also suspect this person never has and has simply believed something someone told them. Now murder is a crime. However a porn block is unlikely to affect the dark web. In fact if anything if you have porn blocks or ban porn all that would happen is porn would move to the dark web where anything could be posted. By this I mean the models may be under age and/or not given consent. At the moment all porn sites (pay sites and most tube sites) have model id and consent forms. And at any point the authorities can check this. Push porn underground and then it is going to make it so you will never know. In the vid it suggests that porn is made by men and only men make money from porn. In fact 99.999% of porn is made by women because they make it themselves and keep the money such as onlyfans and webcams and so on. But facts do not matter as facts destroy the narrative so instead they resort to making facts up. By the way of porn films harm them presumably so do horror films, cowboy films, musical films, comedy films, romance films and so on. Please also see: https://youtu.be/y2ygx6KxaGk

Why would a stranger feel it acceptable to post a discussion about another person’s bits? Does this person post to females asking about there bits? I have had to block this person as I feel unsafe by what seems to be some sort of sexual online abuse. I do not want this person sending me pics of his or her body parts or whatever else this person may do.

A left wing person says they want to see me suffer. I would never wish anyone to suffer. Indeed I am into animal rights as I do not want any animals to suffer. Yet the left wing say they are nice and kind. What sort of person wants someone to suffer? What do they want to happen to me? A slow painful death I guess. These left wing people are not very nice at all. I do not support the strikes as I see people having to cancel operations because of train strikes and may die because of it. I guess that makes me a horrible person not wanting others to die or suffer???

‘These people’ - dehumanising use of words is a technique used by the Nazi party to make us hate others. The idea is you label people in a way to remove the fact they are people and so make it easer to hate.

The murders of millions. The cruelty. The force of your beliefs on others. The fact it has never worked. The fact people are worse off.

I suspect that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have ended the royal family. From now on one suspects it will be one bad story to the next. In reality making the Royal Family toxic. Indeed would you want any member of the royal family to open your business these days? I have always said they should have made Anne queen as she would have been liked. I do not think people have much interest if any in King Charles. And prince William and his wife seem as dull as dishwater. One suspects it will be when rather than if the end of the royal family comes. Perhaps they may drag it out more than ten years. What will be interesting is if such as Labour say if they get in they would scrap the royal family. I say this as they could win an election on that promise alone. I suspect few now support the royal family. And I suspect support will drop year after year. Indeed one suspects those under 40 will have not much interest in the royal family.

I did the site in 30 seconds. It is just a few links to my social media. Why was you on it? We’re you hoping to find my details so you could post my home address in the hope some but would come and murder me? I thank you for your input into my site though it seems to be no more than bullying someone. And yet the left tell us they are kind and would never bully others.

Why is it that the only hate I see is from those on the left? I am not saying others do not post hate however I have never seen it. But the left tell us they are the nice ones. They tell us to be kind. They tell us not to bully. They tell us every person should be treat equally and with respect. They tell us what words we should use to avoid hate. Yet they are the ones of hate. I do not need or want or require these people telling me what words I can or cannot use as unlike them I am not a person of hate. And if being Woke or political correctness did work, then the left would all be nice and never post hate. So they show a being WOKE or politically correct does not work.

If you want to make a £100k bet with me that I was not a student nurse then feel free. But I expect the money paid to me within 24 hours of providing evidence I was a student nurse with no excuses. Also how dare you view people who are bricklayers as dim. How disgusting of you to view others below you. This shows that the left wing middle class view working class people as below them. Disgusting.

Please provide evidence I am right wing. Please tell us how you define right wing.

We often see left wing middle class people copy and past this nonsense as if it is something they thought rather than copied from another left wing middle class person. They seem to think it makes them look like smart and kind people. In fact it shows them to be often duds. The reality of paying people more and more per hour is you need to put up your costs. Thus the poor end up paying even more for food and goods. It shows how little they care for the poor. Indeed the other result is firms take on less staff or even automate jobs or move jobs outside the UK. So the result is less jobs. So people are worse off being unemployed rather than being in work. Before the minimum wage people seemed to be better off. Before the minimum wage we had jobs such as call Center work in the UK. These days jobs are moved more and more to other countries. Many businesses now buy everything in such as China. Even those who claim it is British made often purchase everything outside the UK then bolt together in the UK to claim they are British made. Of course many left wing middle class people often have non jobs that are paid well and are often too thick to understand that in the real world not everyone can have a well paid non job. In the past firms would take on the youth as appreciates and train them and afterwards they would be offered a well paid job highly qualified. Today because firms have to pay these youths who may quit or once qualified go work for a different business see little point in taking youths on and so many youths now are left unemployed. Even fast food places are trying to become 100% automatic to save on huge wages. So what is the point of a high minimum wage if the result is goods snd service cost more and no one has a job?

Oh boy. How you have lost public support. When I was a student nurse we were told never strike. Never even talk about going on strike. As they knew support for nurses would go. A few left wing middle class people backing the strikes is not a reflection of the UK population.

I am dyslexic too. But does that mean other children should not benefit just because I suck at exams. Also is psychotherapist just another non job that middle class people do that may not achieve anything much. It reminds me of those middle class women who fill a house with candles and charge other daft middle class people a lot of money per hour to go hum hum hum.

The Oxford 15 minutes zone thing. And a possible way to get around the silly thing. If the thing is based on a car. Does that mean if more than one person drives the car that it means they will have less than 100 drives a year? Or will it be on the person. If it is going to be the car then the logic is to buy a few cars. That way you drive car one for 100 times then car two 100 times and so on.

I wish the green part was not pumping out left wing rubbish all the time. The Green Party should be for everyone. Does not matter if your left or right wing. A lot of conservatives are into green stuff. At the moment the green part gets six all votes. If it is just a party that likes to play at running a party but not interested in votes then fine. But if they want votes they need to appeal to everyone.

I see no reason to strike these days. Up to the 1970’s often if you went to work for someone you would for life. But today people change jobs with ease. If you do not like your firm then leave. One reason I hate unions is how many UK business have gone bust because of them. And all the business that have moved away from the UK because of unions. In other words unions kill jobs. But the other thing I hate about unions and strikes is that like all socialist systems they force there will upon others by assaulting those who choose not to strike and choose to go to work and cross the picket line. Scream scab at people. Yet for some reason the left wing middle class supports this.