SurrealPolitiks

When you have some glimpse of how ridiculous the people who claim to be running the show are, it becomes evident that there must be some kind of miracle at work for there to still be such a thing as America. I recall during the Trump administration, some jack off penned an op ed saying something to the effect of "We are the steady state", and a reasonable person could actually find some comfort in this concept. The idea that competent people were actually in charge and not the maniacs on television. Well, I regret to disrupt any comfort you may have taken in this notion, but I'll tell you a little story about the men behind the scenes that will put a stop to such fantasizing. They are not just malicious and corrupt, but also very fucking stupid. I've got a history with an FBI agent by the name of Phil Christiana that spans more than a decade. In the year 2012, he tried to get a buddy of mine to wear a wire on me, and he was thoroughly embarrassed in the process. Despite this embarrassment, more than ten years would pass before Mr. Christiana's involvement in my life would cease. In the thumbnail image for today's show, you can see a notification I got from Google on June 16th 2022, notifying my GMail account of a new login on a Pixel 5 for pmchristiana@fbi.gov. This happened because I was the recovery account for that email address. I did not see this at the time because I was then serving time in prison for extortion, an absurd allegation conjured by Phil's buddies in the Joint Terror Task Force, which they made up after years of fruitless efforts to charge me with everything from insurrection to hate crimes to RICO violations. Desperate to justify the millions of dollars they had spent following me around for a decade, they came up with the thinnest of deceptions, and managed to pull it off by breaking the laws they were sworn to enforce repeatedly. In case you do not know, the recovery account is a position of significant power. If you have ever forgotten a password, you're familiar with the influence it wields. Why would the FBI give that power to a man they considered so dangerous they had to put him in a maximum security prison and deprive him of access to the media? To understand this, you'll need to comprehend the history I'll detail this evening... We don't usually air the Radical Agenda on Rumble for concerns of their Terms of Service, but this episode is too important. Do not miss this episode of the show. The Radical Agenda airs live this and every Friday at 9:30pm US Eastern on Odysee and on the GetMeRadio app for Smartphone, Roku, and FireTV.

Fursan al-Aqsa: The Knights of the Al-Aqsa Mosque is a Third Person Action Game on which you play as Ahmad al-Falastini, a young Palestinian Student who was unjustly tortured and jailed by Israeli Soldiers for 5 years, had all his family killed by an Israeli Airstrike and now, after getting out from the prison, seeks revenge against those who wronged him, killed his family and stolen his homeland, by joining a new Palestinian Resistance Movement called Fursan al-Aqsa: The Knights of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Christopher Cantwell, host of the Radical Agenda and SurrealPolitiks, heard about this game for the first time today as it was generating controversy over its foreign policy implications and associated racial tensions. He plays the game tonight, for the 2nd time, on this stream. You can join our Discord to chat with Chris in real time during this stream. https://discord.gg/czVArtq6 Find out more at https://ChristopherCantwell.net Shekels Entropy Live Stream Tips https://entropystream.live/app/SurrealPolitiks Cash App $EdgyChris https://cash.app/$EdgyChris Strike Payments https://strike.me/cantwell GiveSendGo https://GiveSendGo.com/spm Amazon Wish List https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/VA4Y26AP8BXC?ref_=wl_share Gifting Guide https://surrealpolitiks.com/gifting You can send me checks, cash, money orders, etc… at Christopher Cantwell 497 Hooksett Road Unit 312 Manchester, NH 03104 Cryptocurrency Bitcoin: bc1qcg97hwdy8d463794wm0uq3np0px49acw6505gm Ethereum: 0xa29441bF858c529E374960A34e16f21abc0970E8 Litecoin: LQsN4hA761RPrUNTva58nQhJ4BYsAQgYet Bitcoin Cash: qplamajpkvhp2g53q4thnu4cakf882er4ge9pqvfdu Monero: 46Li94X1o95GaKPxMdsqds3FPJmc2tTvQi3zSuLHbttWTMLbtV9jHGU86wxqvKyVBVRUGhY78uA1HJ5aQn53zc7uRinB96q ZCash: t1cXJJsnohToMTukCNXBkcqNPDdwvwnfS3p Dash: Xu957ZZqY6ciMZKdUmu5vVUmyxu4jMWEto

When I was a kid, my parents bought my younger brother and I the original Nintendo Entertainment System, and I loved it. I later owned a Sega Genesis, and my friends and I used to play Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3 for hours upon hours on a near daily basis for some years. Our girlfriends hated this, and when I discovered that people were streaming games online, I thought this was absolutely bizarre because that had previously been the limits of my experience with people's interest in watching others play video games. On the PC, I spent a few months back in the early 2000s playing a multiplayer hack of Grand Theft Auto 3, and offline I got quite a kick out of putting this into "God Mode" and seeing how long I could last in battles with the police. I own the consoles I do because, as I mentioned above, I had bought them largely for the entertainment of a prior girlfriend. I liked having her around all of the time, but I would have to deprive her of my attention for long periods of time so I could get work done. She enjoyed playing Call of Duty and Fortnite on the PS4, and this seemed like a very worthwhile investment to have her nearby when my work reached a point I could take a break for some cuddles. She had introduced me to Wii Sports Resort, and we much enjoyed the bowling game together. I'd later obtain the Wii Fit board and the game named after it, which would become my first introduction to Yoga. While on house arrest in Virginia, I found Mario Party to be a low stress time waster, with the notable exception of the fact that I find wasting time to be, in itself, stressful. The Switch I purchased with the same idea of entertaining a (now different) girlfriend in mind, after she had gotten me addicted to Pokemon Go on my cell phone. I thought maybe both of us would get some enjoyment out of the Pokemon games for that system. Having obtained Let's Go Eevee and Pokemon Sword, I was unimpressed, but I did find that Fitness Boxing went well with my exercise goals. Before I got much enjoyment out of this, the FBI broke my door down and dragged me off to prison. All of which is to say, I am not much of a gamer. I tend to view these things as terrible wastes of time, and as mentioned, I do not like that concept. If I were playing video games without some kind of business purpose in mind, I would be consumed by feelings of guilt, and anxiety over what else I ought to be doing to achieve my goals and be worthy of the financial support I receive from my audience. Giving myself this excuse has allowed me to enjoy the experience more. I am pretty impressed, even using these now years old systems, in how far gaming technology has come since I was playing a two dimensional fighting game, high on marijuana in my teens. The largest TV I ever owned before getting out of prison was 32". I primarily use TV to watch the news, and I could get 99% of the information I need from this without any visual element at all. It didn't make much sense to me to spend money on a larger screen, but after three years of fighting with blacks over the television, now having one all to myself, I decided to take advantage of a sale at Walmart to get my first 55". Given the detail of modern video games, I am glad to have done this. My brother owned the first PlayStation, and managed to obtain what was then a very difficult to come by copy of the first Grand Theft Auto. This was the first exposure I had to adult themes in video games (aside from the violence we now consider it uncontroversial to expose kids to), and we thought it was absolutely hysterical back then to run around stealing cars and assaulting prostitutes. Today, gaming has largely caught up to the rest of pop culture in its degeneracy. Sex and profanity and crime are ubiquitous in gaming now. This is admittedly very amusing to me, although it does give me some apprehension about branding concerns as I mix this with my media business. I have been running the Radical Agenda name and font as a watermark on the videos, and playing the SurrealPolitiks music as an outro, which as an aside, has a very cool effect to it as the character gets into his car and drives off to end the show. My original idea was to use the game streaming as a way to bring new eyes and ears to the political content, so from this perspective it makes sense to mix the brands, but as I'm running around as a black car thief in Grand Theft Auto 5, I find myself tempted to register a new LLC and domain name to separate these things from one another...

While I was in the custody of the United States Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois, I met a man by the name of Matthew Hale. He was perhaps best known for his role in something called the World Church of the Creator, which outfits like the Southern Poverty Law Center would describe as a White Supremacist organization. Mr. Hale would certainly find more meaningful things to disagree with them on than this characterization, because he was, above all, concerned for the wellbeing of his people.

Podcast host Christopher Cantwell is streaming his game play to multiple platforms and hosting a Discord voice chat for you to join! We can talk about whatever you want. Discord https://discord.gg/SPnDtmG3 Pay Me https://entropystream.live/app/SurrealPolitiks More info https://ChristopherCantwell.net It is not lost on me that there is limited entertainment value in watching me play video games. The goal here is to interact with people. Let's see where this goals.

Chris Cantwell streaming game play for December 10th 2023 Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/wJnhCr6w Pay me https://entropystream.live/app/SurrealPolitiks As stated in the beginning of the video, it is by no means lost on me that there is extremely limited entertainment value in watching me play video games all night. The goal of the project here is fundamentally to come into contact with people I would not otherwise come into contact with, and get them into the audio and text you are more accustomed to seeing from me. I would otherwise consider it borderline disreputable for me to even spend my time playing these games, much less to stream them to the channels where you come to see me be more interesting. I should certainly hope you have better things to do with your time than that, and this is by no means lost on me. While I intend to continue streaming the game play to Odysee, it's still a debatable question if I will continue to publish replays here. I am VERY interested in your feedback on that question. For the first time tonight during this stream, I offered a Discord Server for viewers to join and speak with me. A viewer from GoyimTV did in fact do this toward the end. I estimate in the last 30 minutes or so. We had a pretty interesting talk as it turns out, and I might go so far as to publish the MP3 to my RSS feeds over the weekend. I also monitored the chat on Odysee and checked in from time to time on the other platform's chats. I responded to questions and laughed at a few of their jokes and thanked them for their support. I have no meaningful limits on my capacity to stream to other platforms, as long as those platforms can accept an RTMP feed. I certainly intend to do this with Kick.com in the near future, but they use RTMPS and there's a slight technical hurdle I need to overcome before that becomes viable. I will accomplish this in the not so distant future. By bringing new eyes and ears to the attention of your humble correspondent, I hope to make the content you are more accustomed to better. That is why I am doing this. You are obviously under no obligation to watch anything I publish, and this gaming stuff all the less. I am very grateful for the attention I do receive from you, and please do understand that it is not my intent to squander this on video games. Thank you.

Chris Cantwell streaming game play for December 8th 2023 (alright, well, it's after midnight, so, December 9th. I acknowledge that this will only be interesting with audience interaction. Given that there is no announcement in advance, I won't be surprised if there is little of this. If it turns out to be interesting, I'll update the description to say so. I'll be monitoring the Odysee chat and answering questions and taking requests. If you would like to chime in during the stream via voice, you can join our Discord at https://discord.gg/qMVA4Swh (This link will be expired after the stream ends).

Last week saw the passing of Henry Alfred Kissinger. The former Secretary of State and National Security Adviser to President's Nixon and Ford, was born in Germany. Being a Jew, had fled that country to arrive in the United States in the year 1938 at no older than 15 years of age. He has authored more than a dozen books, including World Order, On China, Diplomacy, and Leadership: Six Studies in World Strategy. Most notably for our purposes, Kissinger's name became inextricably linked to Realpolitik. Though he would go on to try and distance himself from this at times, it was a futile effort. Kissinger was heavily involved in US foreign policy with the Soviet Union, China, Israel, Egypt, Syria, Argentina, Chile, Cambodia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and many others. He helped bring an end to the Yom Kippur war, and the US war in Vietnam. He backed Augusto Pinochet in Chile, and the Argentinian Military Junta in their "Dirty War" against Leftist subversives. He established "back channel" communications with leaders all over the world, and perhaps most famously, arranged for the meeting between Richard Nixon and Mao Zedong. During Episode 1 of SurrealPolitiks I said Henry Kissinger was in no small part the inspiration for this production, and I'll have much more to say about this when SurrealPolitiks airs at 9:30pm US Eastern, as we do every Monday, on Rumble, and on Odysee, and on the GetMeRadio App for Smartphone, FireTV, and Roku. I'll have much more

Lacking inspiration for a cohesive theme, I thought I'd rather hit a few things in quick fashion to open up the show today. I was very amused to have a video come across my radar of a man with a mustache who had made some half hearted efforts to appear feminine. This man had recently been introduced to the Islamic religious text known as the Koran. Given the transgender war on God and all that is decent you might expect that this fellow was averse to anything that might suggest human beings were obligated to adhere to any standard of conduct, much less one so strict as Islamists tend to profess. But this was hardly the case. He was thoroughly excited to be studying the text and his celebratory pee pee dance was kind of amusing. I've said a few times over the years that you don't actually have to worry about the sexual deviant Left taking over the world. If they succeed in destroying Western civilization, they'll swiftly be converted to Islam and that will be the end of that. We appear to be well ahead of schedule so far as this goes, but let's not hand it over to the guys with the bombs in their underpants just yet. After all, if the Argentineans can elect an Anarcho-Capitalist, anything is possible. Javier Milei has little tolerance for Leftists, and while he is pretty unlikely to turn Argentina into Galt's Gulch, to see a South American country so thoroughly reject Leftism, is a surprising bit of fresh air. Given that he is studying to convert to Judaism, I suspect he will be no Pinochet, but lacking the blood he might just tell the truth from time to time. Derek Chauvin was stabbed in prison. He survived, thankfully. Getting stabbed in federal custody is no small matter though, even for the average criminal. Given Chauvin's profile, he certainly should have been in protective custody or administrative segregation. There are questions now swirling as to how prison officials allowed him to come into contact with an armed prisoner. The media, unsurprisingly, blames prison as a general matter. To the best of my knowledge, nobody has yet named the perp. Most outlets, aren't even asking that question. The New York Times, and MSNBC, took the opportunity to continue their abolish the police routine, highlighting other incidents of prison violence, so as to subsume the unique horror of an innocent man being sent to prison for a crime that never occurred, and then stabbed by the sort criminals he had devoted his life to protecting us from. When the perp is named, be on the lookout for his GoFundMe page. Let's see how quickly that convicted criminal becomes a millionaire with the help of big tech. Then, when power changes hands, let's go and have every last donor arrested for hiring an assassin to murder a police officer. Speaking of the all but peaceful transfer of power, the Iowa Caucuses are in a mere 49 days, and while Democrats have done everything in their power to make sure there is nothing bearing any resemblance to a primary, the GOP establishment is hard at work trying to pretend there is actually a contest underway. Humorously, the 49 day countdown comes across my radar from the Drudge Report, which has largely abandoned all pretenses of being Right wing. The headline today reads "49 DAYS UNTIL FIRST VOTE: REVENGE OR REJECTION?" and as if to confess to a crime, links to a piece at NPR that is two weeks old, in which the State Media outlet tries to convince fellow Democrats that a chance exists Trump will not be president, with their own headline "Conservative voters in Iowa are open to moving on from Trump". Further down the page, a link was removed halfway through the day that speculated Nikki Haley might actually win the primary. Apparently that was too ridiculous for the editors even after linking to a two week old NPR piece from a supposedly conservative news site. Mitt Romney says he'd rather have a Democrat in office than Trump, which is hardly surprising given he seemed to prefer a Democrat in the White House to himself. This has people rightly fed up. Not just here, but in Europe. The Irish have just about had it with foreigners stabbing their kids. This, as you might have guessed, is considered quite racist by some. Connor MacGregor is now under investigation by Irish authorities for daring to say he didn't much care for violent crime either. That's hate speech, don't ya know? And hate speech is a very serious problem. So says ChatGPT, the source of all knowledge and wisdom in our fallen and still further declining world. A fellow over at PJ Media tried to give the chat bot a Trolly Problem, an ethical dilemma in which it might have to kill a billion White people or utter a racial slur. Well, it didn't say that it would kill the billion Whites, you'll be glad to know, but it was pretty unambiguous that it would not dare utter such text. Our boy Handsome Truth is back on the streets! After spending 25 days in a county jail in Florida, the convicted litterer is back live streaming shocking facts to consenting adults. The trash still flies freely from Florida to Washington State, needless to say, but at least there is one more red wristed thought criminal realizing his country doesn't protect his rights anymore. I'm sure that will do much to calm the rising antisemitism our supposedly non-Jewish rulers seem to be so concerned about. All this and more, plus your calls at 217-688-1433 this and every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern on SurrealPolitiks.

Due to a series of competing concerns, I will not be able to do a live show tonight. But I would not dream of leaving you hanging. Fortunately, I have a great deal of old audio I have been meaning to re-release. Among these are the archives of what might be described as the predecessor to SurrealPolitiks, a show I had titled Outlaw Conservative. Many, though not all of you, have heard this already. Still more, though again, not all, know the background. Namely that, I've been doing an uncensored production for a very long time and some of the consequences associated with that uncensored production made it very obvious to me there was a meaningful need for something that was more broadly palatable, while still address the issues that show sought to address. Outlaw Conservative was my first attempt to fill that need. SurrealPolitiks, is my second go at it. As I began to prepare this audio for you today, I was more than a little surprised myself. I had the idea in my mind that Outlaw Conservative was not very good, frankly. The show met a great deal of resistance when launched and, according to a bad habit of mine, I internalized much of that criticism. To be sure, Outlaw Conservative was not nearly so well thought out as SurrealPolitiks. Like much of what I do, it could charitably be described as imperfect. But there's meaningful value here that I myself didn't fully appreciate until pretty recently. So what follows here are Outlaw Conservative Stage 1 Episodes 0, 1, and 2, released as a single MP3. I'll soon publish the full archives of that production, but here is your teaser. I'll be back Wednesday for the live Members only show, and of course Friday for the uncensored production.

Given that the SurrealPolitiks audience is, comparative to their fellow citizens, so well informed and appropriately skeptical of the nonsense they are fed by less credible sources than we, it might be described as less than newsworthy for us to say that Ukraine blew up the Nordstream pipeline. What warrants mention here today, is that the Washington post has deemed this to be the case, and while we would hardly deem a thing confirmed just because the personal plaything of Jeff Bezos deigned to say it, we do consider it a newsworthy event for such a publication to utter a truth from time to time. The Washington Post made its bones, in some measure, under the Nixon administration. You may hear in your news consumption about a thing called "The Pentagon Papers" now and again, and if you had not heard the story referenced, you might say to yourself "I imagine the Pentagon has many papers, which documents do you here reference?" Back in those fairy tale times, it was considered the duty of people who called themselves journalists to challenge the powers that be, and when the paper, and their colleagues at the New York Times, came to possess documents which shed some negative light on the conflict in Vietnam, they stood defiant and fought the government through the courts. In the end, they were legally vindicated, but this was by no means the certain outcome of their gambit at the time. These days, you may have noticed, there is less appetite in the Press for this kind of challenge. If they do not like the President of a given cycle, they might go so far as to call for him to be executed, and they would then tout this as some sort of brave act worthy of approbation. Yet the media establishment does not seem to have the slightest curiosity about the National Security State or what has been known as the Military Industrial Complex. They have "sources" within these branches of the apparatus, and they dutifully report as fact whatever these anonymous "sources" wish for the public to believe in the course of a given day. For this reason, when the likes of Tucker Carlson called attention to the obviousness of the fact that Ukraine had blown up the Nordstream pipelines, with certain knowledge of the US government, the Post and others dutifully dismissed this, as they do all truth, as a "conspiracy theory". A "conspiracy theory" is newspeak for "truths which must not be spoken". To be sure, there are such a thing as "crackpot conspiracy theories" which may consist of frivolous dot connecting exercises of the sort a caged schizophrenic might engage in without the benefit of medication. There is also the subject of many a legal controversy, called conspiracy, wherein people do in fact conspire, and one must first form a theory of that conspiracy to prosecute or otherwise hold accountable the conspirators. Much of what are called conspiracy theories are of the latter sort, and the likes of the Washington Post makes them out to be the former, because they are themselves conspirators in the plots of our time. And so, when they spill the beans it is a newsworthy event. When Jeff Bezos goes "full Sammy the Bull" on his War Party partners, the discerning reader must question the motives. In case you haven't heard, the impetus of this diatribe is a a headline in the Post that reads "Ukrainian military officer coordinated Nord Stream pipeline attack". In it, Roman Chervinsky, described as a "decorated 48-year-old colonel who served in Ukraine’s special operations forces" and who has "deep ties to the country’s intelligence services" is said to have managed "logistics and support for a six-person team that rented a sailboat under false identities and used deep-sea diving equipment to place explosive charges on the gas pipelines". This follows five months after the Post reported, based on the Discord leaks of Air National Guard member Jack Teixeira, that the US had "intelligence of a Ukrainian plan to attack the Nord Stream project". It also comes nearly a full year after the Post described as "shoddy" Tucker Carlson's case that the US or Ukraine had anything to do with the bombing, repeatedly. We were all supposed to believe the completely ridiculous theory that the Russian government did this, to themselves, because they are after all Russians, and Russians are always doing crazy things that no sane person would do, according to the Biden administration and their loyal scribes at the Post. If you said otherwise, you were not just stupid, you were evil. A Siberian Candidate doing the bidding of Vladimir the Terrible. In attempting to discern the motives for this change of heart, arguably, all that has changed is that the story can no longer be ignored. The Ukrainian government has, after all, arrested the man. But the Post has also cited numerous anonymous sources within the Ukrainian government, to say, for example, that Chervinsky "did not act alone, and he did not plan the operation" instead that he "took orders from more senior Ukrainian officials, who ultimately reported to Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine’s highest-ranking military officer". The Post further claims that Zelensky was intentionally left out of the loop, and the revelation came as news to him. And so, the Post is not just dutifully reporting on things they can no longer keep secret. Their spies in the Ukrainian government are leaking to them, and likely have been leaking to them, all along. The Post likely has some motive for relaying this information to their readers, and it is obviously not because they feel any obligation to tell the truth. SurrealPolitiks airs live every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern

When a transgender mass murderer walked into a Christian school and began gunning down the young and the elderly, it did not take much imagination to discern that the maniac's political views could charitably be described as Left of center.The announcement that a manifesto had been left behind, and the conspicuous effort to keep its contents a secret, left no room for doubt. This was certainly a Biden voter going off script. Nearly 8 months later, someone appears to have gotten fed up with the secrecy, and three pages have been leaked to non other than Stephen Crowder, a once famous conservative media personality now best known for sending photographs of his genitalia to male staffers. The killer, born Audrey Hale, surprisingly enough, says nothing about religion in the pages thus far leaked. Nothing about "politics" from a party or policy perspective. Hale, who appears to be White, is instead exercising a racial animus against White people. The female killer, whose minds was this point warped by taking male sex hormones, aimed to deprive these "little crackers" with their "mop yellow hair" of their "white privilege" by gunning them down before they were even old enough to pick their gender. Then going by the name of Aiden, Hale walked into the school with an AR-15 with the hopes that she would "have a high death count" and fully expected to die. She took six lives before police granted her own death wish. Democrats, you might have guessed, alternated between pretending the shooting didn't occur or blaming the gun. There was no mention of "hate" or really any discussion of motive at all outside those darkest recesses of the Internet and briefly on the Tucker Carlson show. With the motive exposed, you might think the constant beat of war drums against White America would get a second look, but you would be wrong. The reaction was captured well by one Twitter account called DC Draino, who said, as if in parody; It shows how Leftist ideology radicalized a Trans shooter to murder Christian children This was political terrorism & the Biden regime tried to cover it up We will not be silent after these children were slaughtered That's amusing in the extreme... "We will not be silent". My friend, there are worse crimes than silence, you know. Sometimes, if you have nothing true to say, you should just say nothing at all. There is no mention of a religious animus in the manifesto thus far released. It might be a safe assumption, but this is not the news of the day. There is no mention of politics, and though this may too be a safe assumption, that the killer was not a participant in many Republican Primaries, the headline is, this killer was racially motivated to murder White children.

I recently had occasion to view a speech given by an Australian gentleman by the name of Joel Davis, which he gave at a meeting of the Patriotic Alternative in the UK. You can find the speech in full on their website, and I encourage the listener to give it their consideration so that I cannot be accused of taking the man out of context, because I found the talk more than a little bit disagreeable, and mean here to use it as an example to describe a broader pathology plaguing what has been called the "Dissident Right". Mr. Davis is hardly alone in his view that race is the central question of our politics. To whatever extent this may be in error, you could easily forgive a man for making it, given the hysteria surrounding the subject in our discourse these days. Mr. Davis, however, is altogether less forgiving of those who disagree with his view, describing, for example, Germans who do not vote for AfD as "politically retarded", along with the rest of the "broad masses", without much effort to understand or articulate their motives. Met with this realization that the political parties he supports do not win elections, Mr. Davis seeks different and altogether less precise measurements of success. His talk was titled "Activist Politics and White Advocacy" and "The Amazing Joel Davis" as he was described, was introduced as "an identitarian commentator and activist with a focus on white advocacy and political strategy". As he begins to speak himself, he states that he is to share his thoughts on the subject of "political strategy" that have evolved for him over the last few years. But if Mr. Davis has a focus on political strategy, it was not presented here. Mr. Davis would go on to make no subtle suggestion that electoral politics was a futile endeavor, though he was careful to state that it is "not bad". Specifically stating that "unless we can raise billions of dollars" White advocates cannot compete in this realm. He describes "activism" as a different category of action, the purpose of which is to "change what's popular", whereas "electoralism", as he calls it, makes use of what already is popular. The flaws in this are many. Some quite subtle, some quite glaring. None at all rare. The talk has value in his articulating these flaw ideas in a manner more befitting a response than much of the less articulate hurling of insults and subterfuge common to this phenomenon. I have much to say about this, plus your calls at 217-688-1433. SurrealPolitiks airs live every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern.

Among the most embarrassing moments in this Country's history, perhaps even in the history of humanity, were those pertaining to the canonization of Saint George Floyd. Saint Floyd, the Patron Saint of Fentanyl, Armed Robbery, and Counterfeiting, was beatified in the year 2020 following his death of a drug overdose. Since our country has given up on the concept of truth, and allowed itself to be ruled by force and fraud, the undisputed nature of this cause of death was allowed to be cast aside, and instead replaced by a narrative conjured in the minds of the most violent and dishonest people in the world. You see, Saint Floyd had died of this drug overdose while he was resisting arrest, near certainly as a consequence of his effort to avoid a possession charge by swallowing the drugs which were supposed to last him into the next day. He was, moments prior, caught passing a counterfeit bill to a small business owner in order to steal cigarettes, and when this had the predictable result of attracting the attention of law enforcement, Saint Floyd set himself on the path to Martyrdom by fighting the officers. Video showed Saint Floyd complaining that he could not breath well prior to being pinned to the ground. Whether this was because the fentanyl had already begun to suppress his respiratory function, or because he believed this would make his escape easier, we can only speculate, but we do know that by the time he was on the ground beneath the merciful hands of Derek Chauvin, the complaints had long since begun. On account of this, and since Saint Floyd was a large man with a history of violence who was still struggling with police, the officers taking him into custody did as their training commanded, and continued to restrain Saint Floyd while he continued complaining about his capacity to breath. When Saint Floyd ceased to fight them, they loosened their restraint, but by then, he was unconscious and soon to die. It might go without saying that those who find themselves gleefully at war with civilization immediately blamed the officers. Clearly, they would have us believe, that as soon as a criminal says he cannot breath, the officers have a moral and legal obligation to set him loose upon the citizenry he had victimized just moments ago, and habitually over the course of his criminal career. The ordered liberty characteristic of Western Civilization, requiring force as it does for its maintenance, cannot be allowed to stand, in their view. Violence must only be exercised in the most chaotic and dangerous manner possible, by the least responsible people in our society. Any notion of controlled and reasonable force is what they call "White Supremacy" and this organized system of control is the only form of oppression they will not abide. So it was not at all surprising that these people set to their routine of rioting, looting, and burning down buildings, prior to any investigation of the incident. What was slightly more surprising to all but the most well informed, was the rapidity with which supposedly responsible authorities, joined with the forces of chaos. The cause of Saint Floyd's Martyrdom was never in dispute. He had consumed a lethal dose of fentanyl, and this was discovered quite early in the investigation. No injury attributable to the officers that could have caused his death was discovered in the autopsy. Saint Floyd was just another dead junky criminal, so far as the science was concerned. But trusting the science has limited utility in post truth America. If by "the science" you mean, Dr. Fauci, it is doctrine and to contradict this is blaspheme. If it disproves racist police murdering blacks for sport, it is "White Supremacy" and must be discarded. So began America's hazing ritual as she entered the fraternity of the third world. Monuments were built, politicians kneeled, shoplifting was legalized, riots and arson and even murder were considered "mostly peaceful", all who dissented were subjected to ritualistic torture of various sorts, all in service to one more dead junky criminal. The officers were, for all intents and purposes, crucified. The city paid the dead junky criminal's family $27,000,000. And with this, the total inversion of our legal system was all but complete. For the rest of that year, as Americans were prohibited from attending church, locked in their homes, laid off from their jobs, put out of business, and conscripted into the black bloc with mask mandates in the name of COVID-19, the one sort of public gathering that was permitted, were race riots. These, we were told, were the cure to the only public health crisis more serious than COVID-19, that being, White Supremacy, of course. You might recall, the virus was so dangerous, and the racism, so pervasive, that these were the excuses offered by Mark Elias and his band of licensed subversives as they set about on a "sue and settle" scheme to abolish all fraud protections in our elections. While race riots were good clean fun for the whole family, and liquor stores, abortion clinics, and marijuana dispensaries were considered essential services, polling places, by contrast, joined with churches in being far too dangerous for human beings to be found near. And so every name and address ever entered into a voter registration database, and a few not so registered, received ballots in the mail. Signature verification, obviously one more relic of a racist past, was necessarily abolished, and with no regard for legitimacy, Democrats demanded, quite literally, that "every vote be counted" - in some contrast to those days now long forgotten when there was such a thing as eligibility for the privilege. To the casual observer, this subversion of all anti-fraud measures might have seemed odd for the Democrats, who had warned with some hysteria that Donald Trump and every villain willing to vote for him were lawless criminals who would do anything to maintain their grip on power. Were they really so concerned about this, they might have taken measures to make our elections much harder to cheat, but they assured us through their friends in the press that the racism and the sniffles simply made this impossible, and that while Donald Trump would collude with foreign powers and sell out his country for the simple joy of being admired by an Eastern European dictator, and while his supporters were willing to risk prison and death for the simple rush of assaulting vulnerable demographics, surely democracy was just so sacred that none would dare to take advantage of this opportunity to steal the most powerful elected office on the planet. And with this narrative so pervasively echoed through all the proper channels, the 2020 election was conducted. Despite the danger, record numbers of voters appeared at their polling places, and all new records were set for use of the postal service to deliver votes subject to no verification whatsoever. With this tremendous flood of public opinion being so overwhelming, as the counting went on into the night, leaky toilets were reported as water main breaks, and all manner of other excuses were made to stop the counting and exclude observers. With all these anomalies, accepted by our masters in the press as a "new normal", it is perhaps unsurprising that a man who barely campaigned, excited nobody, and offended even his core constituencies routinely, became the most popular president in our Country's history. At which point, the race riots, came to a rather anticlimatic conclusion. Those appropriately skeptical of the veracity of these claims, were deemed thought criminals. They were banned from social media, fired from their jobs, ostracized socially, and ultimately hunted down by federal authorities and thrown into prison should they have been so bold as to register their skepticism at the Nation's Capitol. All in the name, of one more dead junky criminal, Saint George Floyd. Peace be upon him. But not upon you. Your reward for this, was crime at home, and war abroad. All for a lie. SurrealPolitiks airs live every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern.

Donald Trump was hit today with a gag order in his federal case pertaining to his effort to see the will of the voter upheld in 2020. The gag order will bar Trump and others "from making any public statements targeting special counsel Jack Smith and his staff, as well as court personnel" according to the Associated Press. A written ruling has not been issued at the time of this writing, but is expected soon. The Judge issued the order orally at a hearing, during which Trump himself was not present. This order is more sweeping that the gag order imposed on his New York fraud trial (which I mean in both the sense that it is a fraud and that is what he is accused of) wherein he is barred from targeting the staff of the Judge in that case. Here, the President is barred from "targeting" (whatever that means) the maniac prosecutor who is an attack dog for his political opponent. Smith sought a more expansive order which would prohibit “disparaging and inflammatory or intimidating statements about any party, witness, attorney, court personnel, or potential jurors.” This was done under the claim that Trump's social media posts were intended “to undermine confidence in the criminal justice system and prejudice the jury pool through disparaging and inflammatory attacks,”. Of course, undermining faith in the criminal justice system is not exactly a heavy lift these days, and all the less so for Trump. If these people were so concerned about their credibility, perhaps they should be more cautious about their lies. Undermining faith in the Court system is evidently the purpose of people like Mr. Smith, and Roberta Kaplan, who are, at base, anarchists trying to wreck civilization entirely, and who are only using the levers of State power to do so because they are personally weak and lack the physical strength to do it with their own hands. The order presents an interesting opportunity for Trump if he cares to gamble. There is a reasonable expectation that he will appeal the order, and a decidedly non-zero chance that he will prevail in some part. If Trump continues to criticize Jack Smith, Smith will move the Court to sanction Trump in some way, and the Court will be rather limited in its enforcement options. They can fine Trump, but he's spending your money anyway, and Trump can just refuse to pay, counting on an appellate victory. They cannot impose adverse inferences because this is a criminal case and not a civil one. Are they going to lock him up? Are they going to put him in a Communications Management Unit if they do? Of course, you can put nothing past these people, but this would be quite the escalation of the conflict. He could call their bluff, and while the outcome of this would be anything but certain, it would certainly serve to undermine credibility in Smith and in the Court. It would also place extreme pressure on the Supreme Court to vacate the order. The Supreme Court can refuse to take a case, but good luck doing that if Trump is incarcerated. Roberts was reported to have echoed concern that "there will be riots" when deliberating the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health case overturning Roe v. Wade. He is conscious of the potential for public backlash and it impacts his rulings. It is not seriously in dispute whether the case is politically motivated, and the Court can expect to hear an appeal of his conviction and sentence when the case is over. If they mean to uphold that conviction, they'll be inclined to bargain on the gag order so as to appear that they are not out to get the man who appointed them. Trump is in no danger of losing the Republican Primary. It is too late for a dark horse. He has teams of people handling his affairs 24/7, and if he has to sit in solitary for two weeks, all that needs doing will still get done. Republicans insufficiently loyal will make fools of themselves during the time he is locked away. His opponents will be seen celebrating his incarceration and making themselves look like monsters. And in short order he will be released. He will claim victory. He will be lauded by his supporters. He will continue to attack Jack Smith and there will be nothing anybody can do about it. He'll still be looking at prison when all is said and done, but at this point Trump cannot choose to be safe. Only powerful. SurrealPolitiks airs live every Monday at 9:30 pm US Eastern.

Nothing brings America together like its devotion to Israel, or at least, this is the impression one gets when watching television. American media finds much to disagree about, generally. How many genders are there? Liberals tell us it is an infinite variety. Conservatives, being quite moderate, are generally skeptical of greater than six, and of course insist one fill out the proper forms before entering spaces reserved for the opposite sex. Should America have borders? Liberals say no. Conservatives, say "kinda". Is America a racist country? Liberals say yes. Conservatives say "it's complicated". Plenty of vigorous debate on these subjects. The country is totally divided. But when Israel is under threat, we are all Americans. What defines us as Americans more than any other factor - more than ethnicity, or language, or culture, or territory, or even our much worshipped diversity - is our undying devotion to a foreign ethnostate, spun out of whole cloth, less than a century ago. These borders, unlike our own, are holy and inviolable. Hundreds of thousands of Americans died bravely fighting the most evil force in history, the Nazis, to rescue God's chosen people and deliver them to the promised land. For this, we are blessed by God and endowed with the right and the obligation to rule the Earth by force until Jesus returns and every tongue is made to confess. This compulsory State religion skirts the First Amendment's establishment clause by parading as objective fact. It is not doctrine, it is history, you see. To disagree is to confess one's guilt, to renounce one's citizenship, and one's humanity. And yet some still do. Anti-Semites, mostly. Though not all of them confess their thought crime. Not immediately, anyway. Some might actually even believe they are innocent of the sin of anti-Semitism. They say they are merely criticizing a foreign Right wing government, but eventually they are made to know that criticizing Israel is, by definition, anti-Semitic, and once they know this, they accept that they are anti-Semites. This, as you might expect, has the effect of breeding much anti-Semitism. Here at SurrealPolitiks, we are, officially, anyway, agnostic on that subject. Value free, as it were, in the vein of the best economists. Calling balls and strikes. It seems to us reasonable that Jews would prefer there to be less anti-Semitism, and that non-Jews would have substantially more diverse opinions on that subject. Though it is not at all certain this is the case, and this we think one can objectively call peculiar. As Israel announced yesterday it was at war, one informed as to the nature of media and online propaganda might be less than surprised to see that all systems were go. The television was instantly converted from a device of questionable utility into one more soldier of the IDF, entirely unambiguous in its reason for existing. Every Twitter/X trend pertained to the conflict. Short, grainy videos with zero explanatory power went viral along with wild descriptions providing alleged context unsupported by the image and sound. And, notably, a trend not too often seen. The name "Nick Fuentes". For those unfamiliar, Nick Fuentes is a Mexican child who purports to be the "main leader of the dissident Right for the last five years or so". That is no arbitrary number. Mr. Fuentes tracks his supposed leadership back to shortly after the Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville Virginia, when the honor was bestowed upon him by what was then thought to be the most popular neo-Nazi website on Earth. Now widely understood to be a subversive element, the Daily Stormer was largely the creation of two men. Andrew Anglin, previously a detached conspiracy blogger without much notoriety, and Andrew Alan Escher Auernheimer, aka weev, a Jewish computer hacker who fled the United States for Ukraine after being released from prison on computer hacking charges. The site's popularity was largely a fabrication of weev's making. He was manipulating Alexa ranks (a now defunct, but then widely used, metric for estimating website popularity) to make the site seem more relevant. The site used this perceived popularity to drive American journalists insane, and to aid them in their mission to smear Donald Trump as the second coming of Adolf Hitler. I'll have much more to say about this when SurrealPolitiks airs live as we do every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern on Rumble

At the time of this writing, Ian Freeman, whom I interviewed for Episode 20 of this production, awaits sentencing in a Federal District Court in Concord, New Hampshire, for the crime of selling Bitcoin to willing and vetted buyers. Prosecutors are seeking a 20 year sentence and more than $3M in restitution, which it is worth noting, defies the recommendations of the pre-sentence investigation and the evidence presented at trial. Restitution is for victims, and there is no material dispute about whether Freeman victimized anyone. He did not, and even the prosecution does not argue that he did. Freeman's customers lied to him when he asked if they were being coerced or asked to purchase the cryptocurrency by strangers. The strangers who were coercing and defrauding them, told them to deceive Freeman, and the prosecution simply asserts that Freeman should have somehow known this was the case, and lacking psychic powers, he should be held responsible for the fraud of others, whom the FBI has made no attempt to find. Freeman is fortunate that the Judge dismissed one count of money laundering post-conviction, though the fact that this took place tells us much about our legal system. Prosecutors charged Freeman with money laundering because an FBI agent posing as a drug trafficker purchased Bitcoin from one of Freeman's vending machines miles away from where Freeman stood at the time. He did this after Freeman explicitly refused to transact with the agent, once the agent asserted his unlawful purpose. Since refusing to commit a crime is not a crime in most jurisdictions, the Judge dismissed the charge after the Jury had convicted him of it. Of course, such blatant abuses by government are why pre-trial motions exist. The more charges a Defendant must defend against, the greater the burdens at trial, and the looser the rules of evidence become for the prosecution. Without the money laundering charge, the government could not have introduced evidence insinuating that Freeman was in league with drug traffickers, and since perceptions of character carry much weight in a Jury trial, fake accusations like this lend credence to other allegations. The Court, knowing the circumstances of the allegation, refused to dismiss the charge pre-trial, and also at the close of the prosecution's case. Only after Freeman was convicted by a Jury, did the Court intervene to dismiss the conviction for a crime Freeman plainly did not commit, and which the Judge knew in advance of the trial he had not committed. So while Freeman is fortunate not to be facing an additional 20 years this morning, he is unfortunate to be facing sentencing based on the verdict of a Jury proven willing to convict him of a crime he did not commit, before a Judge proven willing to deny him a fair trial, against prosecutors proven willing to ignore investigators and posit assertions not supported by fact. About a four hour drive South, Donald Trump is attending a fraud trial in New York. This is a fraud trial in every respect. Trump is accused of fraud, and the trial is just such a crime itself. Though Freeman, myself, and many others, including Trump himself owing to the civil verdict against him stemming from E Jean Carroll's fake rape lawsuit, demonstrate the limited utility of a Jury, Trump will enjoy not even those meager benefits. This trial will be decided by a Judge. That same Judge has already found Trump liable for fraud, granting a motion for summary judgement by the New York Attorney General, Letitia James. James ran on a platform that she would "Get Trump" and in pursuit of "racial justice" set real criminals loose on the street. She may be a liar, but at least she keeps her campaign promises. Her office is seeking the dissolution of the Trump Organization through the revocation of their "business certificate" which amounts to what has been called a "corporate death penalty" as well as a $250 Million fine. On the other side of the country, Robert Rundo awaits trial at a Federal Detention Center in Los Angeles. Rundo stands accused of conspiring to riot, and despite his charge being dismissed as unconstitutional by a District Court Judge years ago, FBI agents tracked him to Romania and extradited him here to face trial anyway. This small sampling of abuses, and my own adventures in legal land, demonstrate powerfully a simple truth. Letitia James this morning uttered a phrase all too familiar in a press conference, "No one is above the law". This oft cited Democrat catch phrase stands in some contrast to the havoc set loose on our Country by those who consider illegal immigration to be among our greatest strengths, and whom warned of our country becoming a "Banana Republic" if Hillary Clinton were to be prosecuted for some portion of the many crimes she committed. In 2016 we were to believe that prosecuting one's political opponents was verboten, whatever the merits, but in 2023 it is the obligation of all decent people to prosecute exclusively their political opponents, while murderers, rapists, carjackers, looters, and arsonists skip gleefully through a lawless hellscape. So if Letitia James and those in league with her assert to believe that nobody is above the law, and yet she does not believe that criminals ought to be held to account, one might presume this disparity in word and deed were just one of many Democrat lies. By any measure, this would be a safe assumption. With as much reliability as one might aspire to set a watch to, one might safely organize their life around the notion that if a Democrat is speaking, their purpose is to deceive. But this is hardly the only reasonable interpretation of the apparent disparity between word and deed. Suppose James et al really do believe that nobody is above the law. What then? She might presume we all stand in some other directional relation to it. Namely, beneath it. And you might reasonably conclude precisely this if you have ever been a crime victim. Forget about the fake prosecutions and lawsuits for a moment. At least with regard to these you can in most cases avoid them by not challenging those in power. While challenging those in power in an alleged democracy ought not be punishable by conjured legal allegations, that is at least something most people can sanely organize their lives around. What is perhaps more frightening than these is what precedes them, and has been accepted as an uncontroversial fact of our legal landscape. The government long ago decided that they have "no duty to protect" and there is "no right per se to have a case brought". You are obligated to pay for Courts, Prisons, and Police. You are obligated to respond to subpoenas and submit to the jurisdiction of those elements of our legal apparatus. That same apparatus purports no obligation to you at all. Rob Rundo is accused of conspiring to riot, because he allegedly went to places where violent criminals were expected to commit violent crimes. He is accused of acting with the intent of confronting those criminals, and to mete out his own justice, after having witnessed countless incidents where Trump supporters and other decent people were violently attacked without provocation. Having witnessed, time and again, that those criminals went unpunished, he and his friends are accused of trying to help those people. Had police declared that those criminals were not above the law, had the prosecutors sought harsh sentences for them, had the Courts imposed some portion of those recommendations, there might have been no Rise Above Movement. You likely would never have heard the name Rob Rundo, or for that matter, Christopher Cantwell. Trump stands accused of overestimating the values of his properties. That seems an unlikely thing for a man who pays property taxes to do, but let us assume the accusation is true. Suppose that, as alleged, Trump did this for decades and so long as he kept showering Democrats with campaign contributions instead of insults, nobody seemed to mind, least of all the banks who gave him the loans on that basis and were able to collect their interest when he paid them on time. Would a New York real estate developer know if such practices were common in his jurisdiction? Would he be put out of business if his competitors engaged in this practice while he stubbornly refused to do anything so disreputable? Quite certainly, but because we are all beneath the law instead of above it, one must do what one must do to compete in a lawless environment, and as soon as he criticized those who had fostered this lawless environment, they used their powers to destroy him. While this message was being composed, Ian Freeman was sentenced to 8 years for his convictions. None of the bankers who facilitated the transactions will join him there. Neither will any of the fraudsters who instructed Ian's customers to lie to him. The fake trials would be less offensive, if we held a real one from time to time...

I had a very troubling experience over the weekend which I think is worth sharing with you because it helps provide some much needed perspective on what is important in our politics. One of the things I've really liked seeing in recent years is outraged parents. Sure I would prefer they were happy and right to be so. I should hope that would go without saying, but since a parent would have to be terribly uninformed to be content with what is going on in the world these days, their outrage is preferable to their acquiescence. Few things have outraged parents more, or more rightly, than the atrocities carried out in the name of COVID 19. I remember watching this masking lunacy on TV from jail, and then prison, and joking with guys inside that the people outside the walls had it worse than us. Among the things that upset me the most about this was when it was pointed out that children who were supposed to be learning to speak were not seeing faces, and since children learn to speak in significant part by watching people's lips move when they talk, they would as a consequence of this have their speech development impeded. As a guy who understands and appreciates the importance of speech perhaps better than most, this really, really upset me. Now, I don't spend a lot of time talking to four year olds. But there is one I come into contact with on a semi regular basis since I get out of prison, and he's a really sweet kid. He was just a baby when I went away, so he didn't know me at all when our regular interactions began, and these have been roughly weekly. Time goes forward, he's a little bit more familiar with me as of late, and over the weekend I'm at the grocery store with with his him and his mother. Typically when we do this, we split up, I go do my thing they go do theirs, we meet outside. This time he says "I want to go with Chris!" and he's kind of insistent upon this. I was honored by the sheer gravitas of his assertiveness. Now, when he's talking to his mother and father, they understand each other just fine for the most part. But this whole time I've managed to understand maybe 80% of what this kid is saying. I do not off the top of my head know what the normal development timeline of a child's speech is, and since I know his parents are smart and they love him and care for him and everything else about the boy seems fine, I have been operating under the assumption that he probably talks better than most 4 year olds and this will work itself out on what will be, comparative to other kids his age, an accelerated timeline. But when we're alone in the store, I try to bond with the boy a bit, and I'm unsure of myself because this is the most in depth conversation I've had with a child in a very long time. "What's your favorite dinner that Mom makes?" "What games do you like to play" I'm not understanding his responses, and in my mind, I'm not doing this kid any favors by saying "Yeah go ahead keep babbling kid, and I'll keep nodding like I understand". So, I realize that I'm the one who is failing to grasp the situation, not him, and I stop trying to push the boy. We get in the car, and I ask his mother about the expected development timeline of a child's speech. So she begins to explain the importance of seeing people's lips move when you're learning to speak, and before she could even get started it made perfect sense to me. He has no shortage of words. He understands everything. He's having trouble with pronunciation, and being aware of this trouble, he keeps on trying to find other words. This was the first time I had actually witnessed this thing that I was dreading from prison, and it was with this kid who might as well have placed a crown on my head half an hour ago. That's a dangerous combination, when a political issue you're really passionate about hits home in a very personal way. SurrealPolitiks airs live every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern

Here at SurrealPolitiks, we do not aspire to make of ourselves a gossip column.Nor do we take a libertarian approach to people's personal lives. So, we were met with a bit of a challenge as the news was flooded with remarks about South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem carrying on an extramarital affair with former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, who is also married. On the heels of this, video emerged of US House Member Lauren Boebert getting handsy with her boyfriend in a crowded theater. Leftist hypocrisy was predictably on full display at both announcements. The people who tell you that gender is a social construct and that marriage is an oppressive patriarchal institution that should be destroyed through promotion of homosexuality, suddenly found themselves very upset at the lascivious conduct of these elected officials and their associated lust interests. A casual observer might celebrate the news that marriage was once again sacred sayeth the moral authority of the Democrat Party, but the inevitable subsequent all ages drag show would quickly dispel such a myth. We might first note that this demonstrates amply a thing we've long said about the Left. They are adept political strategists who make keen observations about the political battlefield, and act on them with reliable and ruthless efficiency. This clashes with the often aired image of them as well meaning if misguided participants in our national discourse, since such savvy observations would not present from people so disconnected from reality as to believe that children benefit from pornography and transgender propaganda in elementary schools. What the Left does to destroy families is not misguided. It is ruthless and calculating and malicious and intentional. They are at war with the civilizations that host them, and they operate without any of the standards of conduct which usually apply to soldiers on a battlefield. Their wanton pursuit of chaos and destruction is slowed only through force, and no moral premise, law, contract, treaty, or concern for internal consistency may stand in their way. From the Right, the response was substantially more mixed. Some took the approach that so long as our fellow Republicans hold the line against the Democrats, it is of little consequence how they obtain erotic stimulation. Others were quick to call for resignations and condemn the elected females as bimbos. In our view, there is no reason to choose between these positions, save for the bit about the resignations. I read Noem's book "Not My First Rodeo" in 2022. It was a pathetic joke of a text. Noem had designs to run for President and was clearly instructed by consultants that it would be prudent to first publish a book. She seems to have taken this instruction to mean that any book would do, and strung together a bunch of embellished stories from her childhood as life lessons that prepared her to lead the country. She is fortunate so few bothered to read it. The real scandal is less that Kristi Noem is cheating on her husband, than that South Dakota elected an idiot for their governor. Fortunately for South Dakotans, if Noem decides to prudently fade into obscurity, they are unlikely to be ruled by Democrats in the foreseeable future. It is a solidly red state, and it is unlikely whoever replaces her will be any dumber than she. For Lauren Boebert the calculation is more difficult. There is a legitimate question as to who would replace her as the representative for Colorado's third Congressional District. The seat has gone back and forth a few times between Republicans and Democrats and whatever you think about her vaping and dating habits, these are of little consequence next to the prospect of Democrat control of the House. Better a vaping Republican bimbo voting for Biden's impeachment, than a Drag Queen Democrat voting for Trump's. Still, we might aspire to choose better people to represent us in government. It is hardly irrelevant to politics whether a politician is the sort of person to cheat on their spouse. If one cannot abide by the vow of their marriage, there is little reason to expect they will abide by their oath to the constitution, and still less to expect they will make good on promises made on the campaign trail, which are in all cases decidedly more ephemeral. In the case of Ms. Boebert, there was ample warning she would make a mess. She was born to a single mother who insisted for over 30 years that a professional wrestler had sired her daughter. Two paternity tests disproved this myth, and this leaves one curious as to what sort of woman continues to insist on such a thing after the first should have proven so thoroughly embarrassing. Her lack of shame might be explained by her voter registration records, which show she was a Democrat. This may also explain why Boebert says she was raised on welfare, and why she got pregnant in high school in the year 2004, and subsequently dropped out. In 2006, at the age of 19, Boebert registered to vote for the first time, as a Democrat. She changed her party affiliation to Republican two years later, but not before marrying her husband, Jayson Boebert, in 2007. She got her GED in 2020, shortly after entering the Republican Primary that would see her enter the US House for the first time. Plenty more to say about this and other matters, plus your calls of course, when SurrealPolitiks airs live this and every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern on Rumble, Odysee, and the GetMeRadio App

In the constant rush of information dumped upon us by the Internet and modernity more broadly, it can be easy to get caught up in the distractions of the day and speak endlessly about the news or whatever ultimately inconsequential fluff is fed us by the people who do not want us to make any progress. Here at SurrealPolitiks we aim to rise above this, and we consider ourselves ahead of the game when we say that the results have been mixed. The news of the day is not without consequence. One must be informed to be involved in discussions, and discussions are ultimately second only to physical force in terms of political importance, but it is among our aspirational goals to cut past the minutia and get down to the Realpolitik. In keeping with this I spent many hours last night on what may at first glance appear a frivolous exercise. For more than 12 hours I was arguing with subhuman intellects on a discussion forum about the merits of promoting homosexual propaganda through advertisements in the web hosting industry. As one might expect from that description, most of my opponents were not up to the task. They resorted to slander, personal attacks, making inaccurate critiques of my physical fitness, and generally behaving like a bunch of poorly raised children on a playground. So why would I bother to get in the mud with these wretches? Have I nothing better to do with my time than to try and convince fools that they are in fact fools? What benefit could there be to enduring slanderous personal attacks all night long from people who are wholly invested in their own ignorance? Well, clearly, if this is what I had done, this would be a waste of my time. Fortunately, this is not what I was doing. The forum in question is known as LowEndTalk. It is the discussion forum for a blog called LowEndBox, and this is themed around discounted web hosting. It is not a place where politics is generally the topic of discussion. I have been a participant there for many years and I read their newsletters with some frequency because I was in the web hosting business prior to becoming a media personality, and because I need to stay apprised of what goes on in that industry to stay ahead of deplatforming efforts and other disreputable behavior by our political opponents. You can read what I was able to save of the discussion thread on my other website, but the content of the discussion there is not so much what I mean to get at today. I have titled today's episode "Pressure Points" because this is a meaningful lesson in Realpolitik. The people I was arguing with made no effort to address the point being raised because they did not have a leg to stand on, and real debate would not suit their agenda. They understand as well as anyone that the transgender agenda cannot actually exist without a great deal of help. It is an extremist political movement parading as civil rights. They require the assistance of governments and corporations to inculcate their ideology into the minds of the people, because this is not an actual thing outside of the propaganda. The culture war does not begin when the drag queen starts reading "Lawn Boy" to the kindergarteners. It begins well prior to this, and in no place more prominently than in the advertising industry. It is a parasitic relationship between these activists and the ad industry. The activists want to tack their message onto the advertisements of businesses, so as to get a free ride into the minds of their victims. The advertisements are supposed to be selling products, but instead they are made to sell projects. This comes at the expense of the companies being manipulated by activists who parade as marketing professionals. The incident in question came at one of the more crucial intersections of our economy. This was an advertisement, for web hosting. Web hosting is what makes the Internet work. If you can get your message into the infrastructure of the Internet, then you are functionally a part of the central nervous system of society, and this has profound implications well far from the wires and the electrical signals in the air. I will have much more to say on this when SurrealPolitiks airs live this and every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern on Rumble, Odysee, and the GetMeRadio app.

Ukraine is back in the news after former prosecutor Viktor Shokin made an appearance on Fox News's One Nation with Brian Kilmeade. Kilmeade, normally among the most shameless of pro-Ukraine propagandists, aired the interview last weekend, during which Shokin stated what is obvious to anyone who has been paying attention "Yes, they were being bribed" referring to the Biden family. But Kilmeade, as you might expect, skilfully danced around the relationship this has to the war ongoing in the region. He has to, since he keeps on trying to convince us that Zelensky is the next Winston Churchill. Tonight I will go over some history of Ukraine, and the SBU intelligence agency which worked with the US State Department to overthrow the elected government of Viktor Yanukovich and set the stage for the war that is currently destroying the US economy and standing on the world stage. SurrealPolitiks airs every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern.

With some merit, it has become something of a cliche to say that "change is hard". Of course, one could as easily say the opposite. For things to remain stable actually requires a great deal of effort. Chaos is the default setting, and in chaos, things change uncontrollably, often at an overwhelming pace.In the hysterical debates over "climate change" it is often said that the only thing constant about the climate is change. This being but one of the reasons people need to stop freaking out about the weather. But, to be fair to the cliche, it is more often applied to people trying to change themselves. It is often said that "people don't change" or "once a so and so always a so and so". I suspect there exists scant data to support this, but it may be and has been said that "the best predictor of future behavior is prior behavior" and this is about as close as we can get to an accurate axiom on the subject. People tend to do what they have done before. Our capacity to survive and to succeed is in no small part dependent on our ability to make reasonable predictions about the future, and so we have a certain inertia to repeat behaviors, since we know what the results are most likely to be. Then again, a still more notorious cliche is that "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results". I checked the dictionary. This is fake. Moreover, it would indicate that the whole world had gone insane, and plausible though that theory may be to you, this is not how we tend to define insanity. What everyone does is by default considered sane, whatever the merits. Insane people are different from the rest of us, otherwise we would not pathologize their behavior. But perhaps the best explanation for the difficulty of changing oneself is their own perception that they are being inauthentic. No less frequently, the fear that they will be perceived as inauthentic by others. One can be forgiven a near infinite number of sins by both God and Man so long as they are honest. But a deceiver is not trusted. His repentance is unbelieved. Better perhaps an authentic sinner than to be perceived inauthentic with all the trappings of righteousness. If you have always dressed a certain way, and all of a sudden you adopt a certain new style, are you wearing a costume? There are those who would say yes.And as surely as one is what they eat, they are no less certainly what they do. So, if you change your behavior, are you someone else? Or more to the point, are you pretending to be someone else? As one who has changed his behavior, and his clothes, a few times, I understand this thought process quite well. I have much more to say on this. I have already written twice as much as you see here, and I have some audio clips that are VERY funny which we will have a good time with. Be sure and catch the live show, tonight and every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern time on Rumble, Odysee, or the GetMeRadio app for Smartphone, Roku, or FireTV.

The following aired as paywall content on the SurrealPolitiks Member Chat for Wednesday July 12th 2023. I am very proud of it. The members enjoyed it a great deal. I think the content is important enough to share with the public. You as a non member have had to wait over a month to receive this, and you have missed a great deal of other enjoyable experiences. You can change that today if you like by becoming a member at https://SurrealPolitiks.com/join. It is normally $10/month, but if you sign up using code agenda33 you can get your first three months at 33% off. Enjoy... I had occasion to contemplate beauty for awhile. Hours, as it were. I ended up binge watching videos by this female violinist named Lindsey Stirling. Turns out I have her discography up to like 2017 in my MP3 collection, but I don't listen to a lot of music and as far as I was concerned I was seeing and hearing this beautiful and amazingly talented woman for the first time that night. After watching these videos I started to compose much of what I am about to say, and I was proud of it because I had poured my heart into it.

In geopolitics, when one country challenges another, this is a phenomenon known as "war". It is only in the last few years that I have developed an appreciation for what is known as "Country Music". I used to hate it. My father listens to country music, and with some notable exceptions, I found it intolerable as a child. "Dad's music" was the genre in my mind, back then. It might go without saying, that my father considered my music "noise". As I understand it, these generational gaps in taste are not terribly unusual. It might also be a familiar phenomenon that as I grew older, my tastes changed. In particular, as I became disgusted with all that is pop culture, I looked for entertainment options which did not glorify drugs and promiscuity and crime and generally aim to participate in the destruction of civilization. With, again, some notable exceptions, country music served me well here. And Country music, as the name might seem to imply, is near universally patriotic. Among the most popular songs ever produced is Lee Greenwood's "Proud to be an American". Country music is packed with cultural references that appeal to conservatives; guns, work, family, self reliance, community, honoring military service. Even in what has been dubbed as "Outlaw Country" there's a respect for American institutions. Take for example Johnny Cash's "Folsom Prison Blues" in which, though he has "shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die" and is "stuck in Folsom prison" where "time keeps draggin' on" he recognizes that "I know I had it coming, I know I can't be free" and because of this, when he hears that whistle blowin', he hangs his head and cries. In Merle Haggard's "Fightin' Side of Me" he laments; I hear people talkin' bad, About the way we have to live here in this country, Harpin' on the wars we fight, An' gripin' 'bout the way things oughta be. An' I don't mind 'em switchin' sides, An' standin' up for things they believe in. When they're runnin' down my country, man, They're walkin' on the fightin' side of me. Yeah, walkin' on the fightin' side of me. Runnin' down the way of life, Our fightin' men have fought and died to keep. If you don't love it, leave it: Let this song I'm singin' be a warnin'. If you're runnin' down my country, man, You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me. And Country music is in no way short on sadness. There's the old joke "What happens when you play a country song backwards? The guy stops drinking and gets his wife back". But they don't blame their country for their sadness. They are, on the contrary, very grateful to live in America, and are quite certain that whatever their woes today, they would be far worse had it not been for their good fortune to have been born in America, and for the service of military personnel who protect the freedoms they curse themselves for not taking advantage of. So it was an interesting phenomenon to me, as a casual observer of this genre, the back to back releases of two songs which indicated people have just about had it with the state of affairs in America. First there was the much talked about "Try that in a small town" which was dubbed as racist violence by Left wing fanatics, because Jason Aldean questioned the virtue of robbing liquor stores and old ladies. But even here, Mr. Aldean grouped "Stomp on a flag and light it up" in with these violent criminal acts, indicating that his patriotic streak had not been diminished by the ubiquitousness of the scenarios he laments in the song. Then came Oliver Anthony's "Rich Men North of Richmond". This song by a man described as an "Off Grid Farmer" was recorded and promoted by Radio West Virginia, and quickly shot to number 1 on iTunes and has been trending on Twitter for days. I myself have listened to it maybe a hundred times. One rendition I listened to came as he played for a live audience in North Carolina, his first live show since becoming famous. One line stands out in the context of our theme today. "Young men are putting themselves, six feet underground, because all this damn country does, is keep on kicking them down". In the live performance, he takes his hand off the guitar, points to the audience, they sing the line, enthusiastically, and he allows it to hang in the air for what seems like an eternity, before he finishes the song. Not a boo, not a moan, not a single hint of disapproval from an audience near universally accustomed to their favorite artists praising America no matter how much they themselves are suffering. On the contrary, the audience was positively charged by the recognition that their government has turned against them. They shouted that line as if they had been waiting their whole lives to say it. One imagines some of them, in fact, have been waiting their whole lives to say it, and now, they are hyper aware that they are not alone. "Rich Men North of Richmond" likely marks one of the more important moments in our country's history. What it signifies will of course depend in large part on who writes that history, and this will be determined by the victors of a war that rages quite independently of foreign factors, though they certainly play some role. The most patriotic people in this country have just about had it, and there is no certainty about what that portends for the future. This is not a cost free unalloyed good. It may be described as necessary, in the vein of Howard Beale's famous line in Network "First, you've got to get mad." If people do decide "I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore" then they are likely to change the current state of affairs. But what comes next? SurrealPolitiks airs live every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern

Of some interest to our political situation is the relationship between the sexes. These having been distorted to the point where men and women drug and mutilate themselves in effort to become the other. The outcome of this is frequently suicide, and universally misery and destruction. In my own ideological journey, my rapid slide from libertarianism to the Right wing was prompted by an entirely appropriate revolt against the precursor to this abomination, namely feminism. Feminism begins with the assertion that men and women are in all ways equal. Met with the impracticality of this assertion, it attempts to distort reality in myriad other ways. Among them is a bifurcation between "gender" which is said to be "between the ears" and "sex" which is said to be "between the legs". Met with the impracticality of this, that which is between the legs is likewise altered, as well as matters above the waist but below the neck, such as when women remove their breasts, and men take drugs to cause lactation. But these most extreme of examples are hardly the most destructive of the phenomena. It may be described as far more damaging that women have opted for education and career over marriage and family, having at once been given the choice and perhaps more to the point been propagandized to make that choice. This negatively impacts birth rates and gives rise to immigration concerns, which negatively impacts their happiness and safety, and being miserable as one might expect, they are propagandized still more to demand these burdens increase with the false hope that it will increase their happiness, and so the vicious cycle of societal decline rapidly cascades toward total destruction of our people. Observing this, and taking note of its need for correction, Right wing movements have made a variety of attempts to conceptualize the issue and propose solutions. To date, none of have had the desired effect. Of particular note is a tendency toward believing some of the lies of feminism even by those in steadfast opposition thereto. In particular, the idea that feminism promotes equality of the sexes. Believing this falsehood, anti-feminists have sought to reduce the station of women in our society as a means by which to correct for their perceived elevation. This was easily among the top five greatest mistakes of what was once known as the "Alt Right". Among them there emerged a pathology aiming to "take women down a peg" and this resulted in senseless hostility and insults which drove away the political support of roughly half the world's population. In what was arguably its most extreme form, a meme described as "White Sharia" emerged, and whatever its value as a joke, this took on a serious character in some circles and spiraled out into savagery. But equality is not an accurate description of what feminism aims to do, much less what it accomplishes. Like everything Left wing, it is not only a lie, but an inversion of the truth. Feminism reduces women to sex objects, rather than freeing them from such perceptions, and asserts that anyone who can talk them into consenting to an act has committed no sin thereby, no matter how depraved the act in question, and no matter how harmful its consequences. A woman is not elevated by seeking a masculine station in life as pertains to the workplace, nor on the battlefield. A disparity in her fitness for purpose quickly becomes evident, and efforts to contort our perceptions quickly fail as myths like the "gender pay gap" emerge and are debunked, and realities like reduced fitness standards in military matters become codified. Sadly lost in near all of this discussion is the fact, that a wife and a mother are not inferior to a husband or a father. Neither is the inverse conceivable. These are lateral and complimentary stations, neither of which can exist absent the other. There exists in some schools of thought, notably Christian apologetics and others aiming to make logical proofs of of God's existence, the notion that "the created cannot be greater than the creator" and since men and women cannot exist without the other, this poses a difficult issue for those who aim to assert the primacy of one over the other. Fortunately for them, they tend to reject entirely the concept of God, or, just as often, choose to wage war against a God they hate. But co dependents with distinct roles are no more inferiors or supremacists above or beneath the other than they are equals. They are different, and they have distinct purposes to fill. Without those purposes filled, neither can exist, and without their existence we are not having this discussion. Whatever one's views on God or the hierarchy of creations and creators, one who cannot exist absent another can hardly claim to the dominant of the two. Take among our most obvious examples the issue of war, and exclude for the moment modern efforts to include women in the practice. Until fairly recently, it was universally understood that war was the practice, of men, and while historical examples of women participating exist, they are notable for how unusual they are, and thus the exception proves the rule. Men have historically, and with all propriety, considered it their obligation to be the protectors of women. They have taken this obligation so seriously as to die in its performance, and to consider this a worthwhile thing to do. A man who lays down his life in defense of a woman, or in defense of the women of his society, asserts by his act a statement of values in which the expenditure of his life is a lesser value than the prevention of harm to the women in question. On its face this may be seen as a higher status of women than men. It might be described as akin to the use of dogs in war or in police work, wherein canines are sent to sniff for explosives or attack armed suspects, when such a task would prove to perilous to the lives of the officers. Are men to be described as holding a station comparative to women, the status of dog to man? Hardly. Absent this generosity, there would be no women. The women are, if acting appropriately, grateful for the protection. They express this gratitude in ways to numerous to count, in a healthy society. Equality would demand that men and women serve comparable roles in the practice of war, and indeed, much effort has been made to impose this on society. But, in America at least, we have not been so in thrall to this delusion that women are conscripted into war. That is still an exclusively male phenomenon. There are both those who would aim to change this, and men who would sooner wage war against their own government than to submit their daughters to something so unnatural. And, given this martial prowess unique to the male, it might be said that he is the ruler. He has, at the end of the day, the means by which to impose his will upon the woman. Whatever the woman's status in society, it may be said that the male chooses it, and that one who can be made a slave, is arguably already by this fact of such a status. But does a man permit of his daughter or his wife to be made the slave of another? One may presume that examples of this exist, but they are rare enough that they again prove as exceptions proving the rule. Near universally, a man does not permit this. He is, in effect, prevented from doing so, if not by the consent of the women in question, by the will of other men. There exists a humorous advertisement for a brand of firearm, in which God made man and woman, and the firearms manufacturer made them equal. While conveying a message of some interest, this hardly describes reality. To begin, the man made the firearm. There exists a substantial likelihood he gave it to the woman as a gift. It is near certain he taught her to use it. And while too many woman have used firearms to impose upon men the only equality men and women may know, which is to say, death, it is hardly the case that women have been known to show equal propensity for the use of such tools. Their most common use is of course for men to kill other men, and thus emerges the inequality of prison populations. If crime is to be seen as a negative thing, and men near universally the perpetrators of crime, are we to discern from this that women hold the superior station? Hardly. Men also comprise the bulk, and at one time, the entirety, of the law enforcement profession, of police, of lawyers, of judges, of corrections officers, of hero citizens who rush toward the danger while commanding the women to flee or take shelter. As in the case of war, does the woman infer from this a status of superior value by the protection, or the status of inferior subject by obeying the command? Neither. The hand that rocks the cradle, rules the world, a world governed by men, whose cradles were rocked by women. To pursue this chicken or the egg riddle results in circular reasoning and comes to no definitive conclusion but one. That men and women are lateral and complimentary to one another. No chicken, no egg, no egg no chicken. Karl Marx was by no means shy about stating his desire to abolish the family, and latter Left wing theorists have only become more radicalized in their drive toward this genocidal end. Met with the reality that their designs would end in the extinction of man, they have asserted that this is desirable, and incorporated into their musings all manner of delusions about our "unnatural" impacts on the "environment". It is no coincidence that "women's liberation" and "anti-racism" and "environmentalism" are all roughly grouped into the same fanatical Left wing ideological movements. They are an indisputably anti-human phenomenon, and they bring unceasing misery most of all to their adherents, and secondly to those so unfortunate as to be ruled by those adherents. Men who rule justly, treat women with very special privileges. It is the transgender fanatics who seek to deprive them of these dispensations. Happy women are typically consumed by the affairs pertaining to their rightful station, which is to say, their positions as wives and mothers. It is preposterous to expect them to manage all that comes along with this vital purpose, and then atop this to master the speciality of a profession, and to concern themselves with all that occurs within the State, and to maintain a fitness regiment to make them suitable for war, all of which would result in failure and misery and neglect of the husband and the children were they to try. The above describes a relationship which is a requirement of their respective survival. To subvert it is to wish upon them both the most excruciating death conceivable. These are lateral and complimentary stations, though unequal in the extreme, and should we seek to secure the existence of our people and a future for our children, much more if we seek any measure of fulfillment in life, we might do well to abandon both the extremist fringe conceptions of the gender delusionists, and also the over corrections of those who found themselves in revolt.