Revisiting 9/11

Why is the ONLY independent forensic investigation done on WHAT happened to 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 CENSORED for the last 16 years?! They are SCARED of the evidence this scientist filed in 2007 AGAINST NIST's subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD. The 9/11 "truth" movement talking heads have been ACTIVELY steering you away from the EVIDENCE this scientists presents. Full series here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Deprogramming-series:6

This is just the highlights. – A 2h panel discussion covering FEMA on 9/11, issues with journalists, geo-engineering, the energy question and more Article by the host: https://truthsummit.substack.com/p/taking-stock-re-911-andrew-johnson-richard-gage Original source video: https://youtu.be/8WJDYpI9wmY

Ever since September 11, 2001 people have been outsourcing their thinking. Listen to what Professor Morgan Reynolds' 2009 Qui-Tam case was about. Discussing air pressure, drag, aerodynamics and then let’s also look at the fraudulent NIST aeroplane impact report as well as the planted aeroplane fuselage and debris at the WTC complex… And by the end of the video, SAIC and their “specialisation in impacts and explosions” and you’ll see they gave NIST fraudulent impact reports pertaining to the “planes” that supposedly hit the towers. People also seem to struggle wrapping their brains around what the buildings were built with and that there is no way in hell, aluminium can cut through steel, like a hot knife through butter... Just exactly what did those "planes" have to go through? Anyone that believes jet fuel, explosives, thermite, buried nukes, mini nukes were used, most probably also still believe in fairies, unicorns and santa claus. Open up your mind, LOOK at what is being presented to you in this video and be sure to put on your thinking cap, because a large proportion of people have fallen for the trap of the cover up, believing that the 9/11 "truther" movement are actually looking to expose the truth of WHAT happened to 8 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 - Americans, WAKE THE FUCK UP! Ask yourself the question, WHAT are all the 9/11 "truther" talking heads really doing, whilst asking for donations and talking absolute bullshit? Why, after nearly 22 years, do we still have such a strong cover-up with regards to the events of September 11, 2001? Why does the 9/11 "truther" movement and Wikipedia not want you to know about the 2009 US Supreme Court Qui-Tam cases? Top 5 Facts About September 11th, 2001 - Look into the work of Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson and STOP outsourcing your thinking to the psy-op, that is the 9/11 "truther" movement.

Excerpt from the EXCELLENT documentary by Wolf Clan Media – 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality You need to watch the full 3h docci on Odysee or Rumble, as YouTube does not want you to see it.

A blow by blow discussion on why the "Space Beam" idea is a distraction from WHAT really happened on 911. For more visit Odysee: @911revisited:7

Look, he does some great work, BUT what he shares, he's only accurate for 80% of the information. The question is, why is he holding the 20% of truth? This interview was done before he got involved with Steven E. Jones, who has CIA, Dept of Energy, Los Alamos labs and more connections that don't want you to know about Nikola Tesla's technology from a 100 years ago...

A Short Film About Dustification Two 110 storey towers with a height of 1,368 feet, and a 47 storey building with a height of 589 feet, WTC 3 and 4 all turned to dust and dispersed over the whole of lower Manhattan and out to sea. These were all world class buildings, very well designed, and very well constructed. Just think of all that structural high grade concrete, and all the internal material, heavy elevator machinery, electrical gear, transformers, plumbing, water tanks, office furniture. All gone in seconds, practically atomised. And two jet airliners are supposed to have done this.? This is no terrorist attack, or demolition job, or nukes. People need to wake up, and find out WHAT really happened on 9/11. Video credit: project3ss - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuTp7HkpW7U

So, Colorado 9/11 Truth have published their Zoom meeting, from 13 May 2023 where they fell over their feet trying to dodge and dive questions from a guy called Norman. The zoom meeting was a presentation of Wayne H. Coste, PE paper – “The Case for Propelled Demolition at the Twin Towers”. Read the paper here: https://911speakout.org/wp-content/uploads/WTC_Propelled_Demolition_Paper.pdf There were 6 questions for Wayne, which seemed to get the host, David Chandler, Wayne, and the moderator “Dorothy” in some entertaining discomfort, just before they started the question-and-answer part of the meeting because everyone in the meeting could see all 6 of the questions. First, they “couldn’t see the questions”, then they asked two of the questions, but then stated that they didn’t have enough time to answer all the questions but would ask two more questions after being called out for being disingenuous and other attendees asked why Norman was being ignored and then the two promised questions to be answered was lessened to only 1. Then it’s important to notice how the question is not answered fully, especially the part of the question on the “spire” … The stupid comment of beams cut at angles will be addressed with an add in video, debunking their “proof” of thermite charges being used. The question-and-answer session is also edited in such a way to hide how they are stumbling over their feet not to have to answer the questions, and they were so rattled, their main talking head Richard Gage had to chime in, in his t-shirt to save their asses. Just a pity the question-and-answer session was edited as to lessen their stumbling around. The questions for Wayne: 1. In the conclusion of your paper, you mention “Erik” – “without who’s unrelenting nonsense the concepts underlying this paper would not have crystalized." – So, who is Erik? 2. With regards to your propelled demolition hypothesis, one needs to remember what is seen in RR welding... Thermite reactions are very audible with hissing, spitting and have a long duration, like firework sparklers. When looking at the video evidence with regards to the South and North Tower “spires”, it seems to nullify your hypothesis of where the thermite could have been placed, as you just breeze over the “ghost spire”, not even attempting to explain the visual of the solid steel spire, wobbling and moving to and fro, and then drops down vertically. Now, you did mention that there were 16 people that survived at the bottom of the North spire, so where did that 70-story high spire go? How did it not drop down on the people below in stairway B and crush them? Why did they not suffer any burns from the thermite charges going off and then falling on them from above? 3. On September 12, people commented on the news, that people could not believe on how LITTLE rubble there was, so where did all the steel go? 4. So, if it was thermite, why do we have witness testimonies of vehicles spontaneously combusting, Scott packs and oxygen tanks were exploding in fire trucks and ambulances parked in the streets around the WTC complex – Do you have an idea what caused that? 5. What caused the fuming that kept on going for the first 100 days after the disintegration and I have also seen video of this fuming and watering down of the debris field in 2008 – If you study the USGS Thermal pictures, which were the results of NASA’s Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) remote sensing data and interpretations that showed the distribution and intensity of thermal hot spots in the area in and around the World Trade Centre on September 16 and 23, 2001. The hot spots were shown as orange and yellow areas. Dozens of hot spots could be seen on September 16, but most had cooled, and the fires had been put out by September 23. So, what caused the fuming without heat, up to the video evidence in 2008? 6. Lastly - You also touch on “A partial list of refuted hypotheses” regards WHAT happened as well. I am interested in your criticism of DEW… I’ve read Dr Wood’s book and she discussed the lack of seismic readings, and she also refers to the changes of the earth’s magnetic field. Do you have any thoughts on this? Because if you look at the core coulombs where the survivors where, they weren’t bent, bolts weren’t ripped out and on the one tower’s remains, you had some of the wee-checks that came unbolted in the middle of a grid? How would you explain this? For the 3-part upload of the presentation, feel free to go have a look on their Odysee channel @CO911Truth:1

How can someone come up with WHAT happened on 9/11 if they eliminate almost all of the evidence in their investigation? See more on Odysee: @911revisited:7

So, after lambasting people for donations for the last 16 years, there are FACTS about WTC7 that AE911Truth / Richard Gage and the whole "truther" movement NEVER dares mention. Find more uncensored content on this Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

But do they address the questions? Find more uncensored content on this Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

We look at the 9/11 Orphans - WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust Building Find more uncensored content on this Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

Where did it go? Find more uncensored content on this Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

The 9/11 orphans are: WTC 3, 4, 5 and 6 Find more uncensored content on this Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

I found this interview on what I believe to be an inactive YouTube channel of Dr Abraham Rodriguez, who called out Richard Gage and AE911T for the disinformation agents they are, in 2011 for the first time. See the interaction on this Odysee Channel: @911revisited:7 In this second interaction, it is easy to see what a organised disinformation group AE911T and especially Richard Gage actually is.

There are many layers to the union that is the 9/11 psyop - Which door did you choose? Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Visit the Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

The core / "spire" of the towers were massive! How did the 16 people survive? Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Visit the Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

You've got to be a special kind of stupid to believe the lie that thermite was to blame for the disintegration of the towers. For a full analysis see Part 3 of "9/11 Observable Evidence" located under "playlists" on this channel. Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Visit the Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

What happened to WTC6? How did those people in stairwell B of Tower 1 survive without being crushed? Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Visit the Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

Most people can't handle the TRUTH! Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7

Maniacs are responsible for 9/11 Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7

People were told WHAT to see, but did they really see WHAT happened on 9/11? Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7

Mainstream narrative, vs controlled demolition vs thermite vs nukes and the TRUTH "Debunkers" vs "Truthers" and the limited hangout it is ;-) Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7

The first step is to understand the facts, because without the FACTS, you yourself won't actually know WHAT happened on September 11, 2001 Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7

Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7