TheDarkMan

Or perhaps that should be Joe Bliden alias The Big Guy.

My two shekels’ worth. “Dress Codes Are Not Male Oppression” https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/wikinut/wikinut-dress-codes-are-not-male-oppression.html The entire body of my work can be accessed from here: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html Donations to support my work, Paypal: itsthatmanagain[AT]yahoo.com Contact me direct to make a larger donation.

This was indeed a potpourri. I covered: The ongoing Benjamin Mendy case. An American college case. A case from Australia – small Asian powerlifters! Comment from the police in India, etc. The Ricky Martin case. Ashley Biden’s diary. A rape case involving an American politician. Various other ongoing cases from the United States. Allegations of sexual harassment against politicians in the UK. Allegations against the legendary George Foreman. This should be fun! Another allegation of sexual harassment from the United States. Brainwashing by campus feminists. Allegations from South Korea. Various other cases including an amusing one from Malaysia. A humorous case of what might be called sexual harassment which led to two police officers being sacked. A discussion of unreported cases handled by a UK law firm. An article by an American student airhead. A police data issue.

A short, sensible solution to a self-inflicted problem. The entire body of my work can be accessed from this link: https://infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html Paypal donations: itsthatmanagain[AT]yahoo.com

Here is a transcript of my narration only. Donald Trump was ordered to sit for a deposition in August 2022. This was in New York at the behest of its Attorney General Letitia James. He refused to answer any questions, over four hundred of them. He was mocked for this, including by Hillary Clinton who spent hours testifying to Congress under oath. Is Trump less honest than Hillary? Is anyone less honest than Hillary? Here she is with Letitia James. And here is James herself... Fine words, but when she says no one is below the law, some people would disagree, including Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch who said the witch-hunt Donald Trump faced from the moment he announced his run for the Presidency to date means he is indeed below the law. As for no one being above the law, Hillary Clinton is, so are many other leading Democrats. On YouTube you will find many compilations of Mrs Clinton lying continuously including some extremely serious lies. Feel free to watch them at your leisure, but here is one of her co-conspirators spilling the beans on her under pressure from Trey Gowdy... In case you don’t realise how serious this was, let me explain. A Member of Parliament is a public servant, everywhere in the world. As Trey Gowdy pointed out, Mrs Clinton was a State Senator – for eight full years - and Secretary of State for another four. That is the third or arguably the second highest office in the land. Her e-mails and all her correspondence are the property of the state. State archives on both sides of the Atlantic contain such correspondence going back hundreds of years. Governments have special high security intranets for the kind of e-mail correspondence she was handling, including JWICS. Somehow, she or her co-conspirators managed to find a way to transfer the contents of top secret documents from SCIFs onto the regular Internet. She did this to get around freedom of information laws. Why would she do this? Because she and her husband, the twice former President, were operating a pay-to-play scheme. They were selling access to foreign governments and corporations, something that is tantamount to treason. The current President was doing the same thing through his son. The entire world knows this, but the mainstream media looks the other way, as do all leading Democrats. While there are no penalties for the likes of Mrs Clinton when they lie under oath, there would have been for Donald Trump. I’m not suggesting he would have lied, but if you were asked four hundred questions in one session, then were asked the same four hundred questions a month or a year later, would all your answers be exactly the same? Probably not. This woman James would pounce on the slightest inconsistency and would probably charge him with something. Here is the proof. She is clearly obsessed. A senior law officer isn’t supposed to investigate people because she doesn’t like them; she is supposed to investigate crimes. She should be removed from this investigation, that’s if it isn’t shut down.

A little humour for y’all. Please share. The entire body of my work can be accessed from this link: https://infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html Paypal donations: itsthatmanagain[AT]yahoo.com

Something for you to think about, especially you younger ones.

It Wasn’t About Cosby; It Isn’t About Corbyn Back in the late 1960s, early 1970s, a Batman comic, or maybe it was the TV series, featured an unusual plot. Batman’s arch-enemy the Joker would break into a warehouse and steal a wheelbarrow, then into a factory and steal a pot plant. Weird stuff. Batman and his sidekick in tights thought the Joker had gone off his rocker until they ran the relevant information through their computer. (In those days computers were massive things that ordinary people couldn’t house much less afford). What did the computer reveal? Only that the thefts were a distraction: the Joker was taking photographs. The recent trial and conviction of Bill Cosby was a similar distraction. Some people, mostly blacks, thought it was about race. It wasn’t about race. Others thought it was a genuine attempt to take down a serial sexual predator by hook or by crook. It wasn’t that either. Cosby was a distraction. The real purpose of the Bill Cosby witch-hunt was and is to remove statutes of limitations throughout the United States in all allegations of rape and lesser sexual offences. Here it is straight from the lips of one of his myriad false accusers: the whore Janice Dickinson: “I blame the laws about the statute of limitations which held me back because I believe it was ten years. Ah, I, I, I would very much like to see the laws change in America where there will be no statute of limitations ever...” If you want to see where this can and will lead, look at the UK where innocent men, famous and ordinary, have their worlds turned upside down or even their lives destroyed by whores like Dickinson or head cases like this certifiable lunatic. In the UK, we have seen and are seeing at the present time a different kind of witch-hunt, of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Many prominent Jews have pilloried him as an anti-Semite. The Jew with the biggest mouth here is the woman Norman Finkelstein calls the Barking Yenta, Margaret Hodge. Corbyn can make all this slander and libel go away; all he has to do is sign up the Labour Party to what Organised Jewry call the official definition of anti-Semitism, a definition that is no such thing. If he does this, they will never let up; they will simply demand more and more, continuing to whine about how oppressed and hated they are as they continue to pogo on other people’s heads. Signing up to this specious so-called definition would put Jews and in particular the State of Israel - the country that did this - above all criticism, and make it a criminal offence for ordinary people to speak out against it. I’m speaking here from personal experience because in 1996, Organised Jewry tried to drag me into court for exposing their blatant and easily provable lies, albeit on an entirely different subject. You’ll find my full videos on the Cosby witch-hunt and the campaign against Corbyn linked below; the latter is very short. Whenever you hear someone campaigning to take away your rights, campaigning for repressive legislation, or special privileges for some supposedly oppressed minority or other, always look behind the rhetoric. More often than not you’ll realise their ostensibly good intentions are anything but. Jeremy Corbyn — Anti-Semite? https://archive.org/details/jeremy-corbyn-anti-semite-archive The Prior Bad Acts Of Gloria Allred https://archive.org/details/the-prior-bad-acts-of-gloria-allred-archive

This pre-recorded hangout really is a potpourri. It covers the following in more or less this order: the ludicrous historical case against Bob Dylan, now dismissed. Judge Roy Moore – who has now won a massive defamation case; I threw in the name Gloria Allred, who should have been disbarred for her involvement in this sordid affair. I played a short clip of Paul Gambaccini spilling the beans on the OPERATION YEWTREE witch-hunt. He put up the name Keir Starmer, which did surprise me. Allegations against the American celebrity Ryan Seacrest, which are not recent. Several cases from India. Prince Andrew – again – an innocent man whose false accuser has been given a free pass. A daffy woman who was given space by the GUARDIAN to tell how she was raped. As if. Amber Heard – the woman female lawyers don’t believe. An attack on a girl in Trowbridge, apparently with intent to rape. The guy bit off more than he could chew. A horrible rape/murder from New Jersey. Murderer and serial rapist Ronald Evans. Another scheme to increase rape convictions (at the expense of justice). A rape acquittal – alcohol! Allegations against South Korean performers. A false allegation against singer-songwriter Ricky Martin. The Ronaldo case yet again. The Benjamin Mendy case – currently on trial. The case of two French police officers convicted then cleared on appeal of raping a Canadian woman. A ludicrous case of a woman suing the police for releasing her name. She claimed to have been gang raped. An article by Emma Priest – apparently an intelligent one. Some ludicrous cases from freedom of information files. The acquittal of Vassil Kokali for the rape of Audrey Cox – another case due to alcohol. The case of Gretchen van Winkle. The garbage espoused by Charlotte Proudman.

My entire work can be accessed from this page: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html Donations: itsthatmanagain[AT]yahoo.com or contact me direct to make a larger donation.

A woman who needs to spout less dogma and read more history.

A transcript of the original speech can be found here: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/the-truth-about-pornography.html

A short introduction. A transcript (of my narration only) can be found at this link: https://infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/what-is-gaslighting.pdf To support this channel, please donate via Paypal: itsthatmanagain[AT]yahoo.com The entire body of my work can be accessed from this page: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html

A poem in free verse dedicated to the most evil Jew in America.

Just a few thoughts to put this non-scandal into its proper perspective.

This is a video which was originally uploaded to YouTube (in two parts); an exposé of how the mass media endorses the lies of Jewish hatemongers in the full knowledge that they are lies. At that time, my videos were limited to ten minutes in length, hence its being uploaded in two parts. (The marvels of modern technology). Incredibly, on June 27, 2021, the first part was removed as “hate speech”. After 12 friggin’ years. This was actually my first ever YouTube video.

British Grandma On Death Row? Yeah, Right https://theduran.com/british-grandma-on-death-row-yeah-right/ LINDA CARTY: The Guilty Murderess - As Documented By The United States Court Of Appeals https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/other_carty_by_us_court.html Link to all my websites: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html The above video was uploaded to BitChute on April 1, 2022 but was not made public until the small hours of the following day. Paypal donations: itsthatmanagain@yahoo.com

This book can be ordered from the link below: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/mg-release.pdf

A poem in free verse dedicated to the most evil Jew in America.

A short lesson from 32 years ago and this month. Stop the madness! (This video was uploaded to YouTube on March 18, 2019).

This video was uploaded to YouTube on February 4, 2017 and was “Dedicated to the braindead social justice warriors of the world.” On October 24, 2020, it was age-restricted, and late on the night of December 21, 2021 it was removed for violating community guidelines on violent or graphic content policy. I decided not to appeal. What would be the point?

London Pride https://www.songfacts.com/facts/noel-coward/london-pride Noël Coward https://www.noelcoward.com/ Never forget 7/7 or any other terrorist attacks.

I was working on London time so the live hangout began in the small hours of November 21 for me. Anthony is based in the United States, hence the date difference. This is a live YouTube hangout which follows the Democratic Party debate.

This is the illustrated version of A SATIRE ON THE ADL. The un-illustrated version was published here simultaneously. A few points. Firstly, if i can be shown to have misattributed any of the photographs used in this film I will publicise the correct attribution as soon as practicable. My inexpert editing may give the impression that the Nazis dynamited people's homes, or that I think they did. I apologise for this; I've been having problems with Windows Movie Maker, in particular the film doesn't always break where the program indicates it does. For me at any rate! The Nazis did not dynamite people's homes, nor did they break the bones of Jews with rocks as shown here. Before the outbreak of World War Two, the persecution of the Jews was done within a framework of the rule of law; admittedly this law became increasingly repressive, but nothing like this happened in Nazi German or anywhere under Nazi dominion until well into the War. It is notable that "individual acts" against Jews were forbidden, and at times were punished severely. I have documented some of these in my book "Holocaust Denial: New Nazi Lie Or New Inquisition?" This documentation comes from Jewish - and only Jewish - sources. [Free download of this book in PDF format from Archive.Org]. It is not only white "racists" who are smeared by ADL hatemongers. One of the people they have traduced most is Louis Farrakhan. Herein he refutes the claim that he slandered the Jewish religion. The second clip shows Farrakhan's condemnation of the bigotry of blacks too, in particular the nihilistic gun culture of certain rap musicians and their "dissing" of the police and of law and order generally. I like in particular his comment that if rap musicians incite the murders of police officers there will be an equal and opposite reaction. This is the reality of most so-called anti-Semitism; Jewish hatemongers like Abraham Foxman - whom I have no hesitation in branding the most evil Jew in America - pour hate and vituperation on the goyim by the bucketload, and then whine about anti-Semitism when they are repaid in the same coin. His and Organised Jewry's attacks on Farrakhan and on Black Separatists generally has nothing to do with their anti-Semitism (real or imagined) and everything to do with their rejection of miscegenation, but that issue is beyond the scope of the current work. I should add that the occasional repetition is deliberate.

A transcript can be found at this link: https://infotextmanuscripts.org/allred-and-bloom.pdf To learn how Gloria Allred framed Bill Cosby as a serial rapist, check out this video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/CXW2aJWdTxZN/