Step aside NASA—take us to Mars Elon Musk!

1 year ago
283

"We can—and should—develop space without government help," says Reason Foundation's Robert W. Poole.

update russia vs ukraine,
live update russia vs ukraine,
ukraine vs russia update peace talk,
ukraine vs russia update cnn,
russia vs ukraine war update hindi,
ukraine vs russia update tagalog,
ukraine vs russia update map,
ukraine vs russia update youtube,
russia vs ukraine war update english,
russia vs ukraine update now,
update russia vs ukraine war,
an update or update,
an update meaning,
an update,
anaconda update r version,
russia vs ukraine war update bbc news,
russia vs ukraine war update bangla,
ukraine vs russia update bbc news,
difference in ukraine and russia,
can ukraine win against russia,
can ukraine defend against russia,
update russia and ukraine conflict,
ukraine vs russia casualties update,
ukraine vs russia live update cnn,
mengapa rusia invasi ukraina,
invasi rusia ke ukraina,
is russia planning an invasion of ukraine,
why did russia invade ukraine and georgia,
russian invasion ukraine analysis,
russian invasion ukraine al jazeera,
russian invasion ukraine article,
russia invasion and ukraine,
russia's invasion of ukraine and how it affects global economy,
russian invasion of ukraine animated map,
russian invasion of ukraine and international law,
russian invasion of ukraine airport,
russian invasion of ukraine assessment,
russian invasion of ukraine aftermath,
a russian invasion of ukraine,
will russia invade ukraine 2021,
russia invasion ukraine bbc,
russia invasion before ukraine,
russia ukraine invasion breaking news,
russia invasion of ukraine battles,
russian invasion of ukraine battles,
russian invasion of ukraine background,
russian invasion of ukraine bbc news,
russian invasion of ukraine britannica,
russian invasion of ukraine belarus,
russian invasion of ukraine began,
russia hit nato country,
russia hit nato,
russia hit nato territory,
russia hit nato base,
russia hit nato poland,
russia hit nato ship,
will russia hit nato,
did russia hit nato,
has russia hit nato,
has russia hit nato yet,
nato russia border,
nato-russia relations,
nato-russia news,
nato-russia war,
nato-russia tensions,
nato-russia council,
russia attack nato,
russia-nato,
nato russian war,
nato f-76,
nato-russia,
is russia hot or cold,
is russia hot in the summer,
is russia a nato country,
is russia nato,
is russia a nato member,
nato hot mic,
k russian names,
russia nato,
vladimir a novel,
b vladimir putin,
vladimir putin birthday,
vladimir putin d.o.b,
vladimir putin youtube,
best book on vladimir putin,
best vladimir putin biography,
c vladimir putin,
how much is putin worth in russia,
vladimir putin legion d'honneur,
vladimir putin d,
3 facts about vladimir putin,

https://reason.com/video/2022/12/20/w...
___________

After a few failed launch attempts, Artemis I finally completed its first unmanned journey on December 12, 2022. It's part of NASA's ambitious program to bring American astronauts back to the moon for the first time in half a century. And then on to Mars. That is, assuming NASA can pull it off, which is a big question mark given its record to date. Is NASA just trying to relive the glory of the Apollo mission?

Could private companies take us back to the moon and Mars faster and cheaper? Most likely, yes.

Artemis I's first three attempts at liftoff were canceled because of leaking issues connected to the rocket's ground system. The fourth attempt, which was successful, brought the price tag to $4.1 billion, and the next three launches are each expected to cost about the same. NASA's auditor estimates that the Artemis program will spend $93 billion by 2025. Because of delays, it's unlikely that a human will make it back to the moon by the end of 2024, as originally planned.

Once upon a time, beating the Soviets to the moon bolstered America's claim to technological and ideological superiority in the 20th century.

"Basically [Artemis] is designed to repeat the Apollo program," says Robert W. Poole, who is the director of transportation policy at Reason Foundation, which publishes Reason and Reason TV. He says that NASA tends to stick to old ways of doing things, isn't particularly interested in cost savings, and its decision making is overly driven by politics.

The hardware that powered Artemis I is known as the SLS—the Space Launch System—and was developed in partnership with Boeing. Critics have another name for it.

"The Senate Launch System, because it was concocted by the Senate as a way to rescue Constellation, give it a new name," says Poole.

NASA would have been better off replacing the costly and dated Space Launch System used in the Artemis program. But it didn't. This probably has a lot to do with the fact that it was largely constructed and engineered in Alabama, the home state of Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Richard Shelby, who has a history of strong-arming NASA to preserve jobs for his constituents.

In 2019, the Senate earmarked $2.58 billion as a starting point to cover the Space Launch System's ballooning price tag. The Senate funding also required NASA to make use of old warehoused materials from Constellation, ostensibly as a cost-saving measure.

Ever since Neil Armstrong's one small step, there have been giant leaps in space transportation made in large part by the private sector.

Private companies already design and lease NASA much of its hardware. Poole says there's no reason NASA can't take it a step further and just use the SpaceX starship to cover the entire journey from Earth to the moon and eventually to Mars.

"If the current NASA plan goes ahead to have the SpaceX Starship actually deliver the astronauts from the lunar outpost orbit to the surface of the moon and bring them back, that would be an even more dramatic refutation of the idea that only NASA should be doing space transportation," he says.

Poole says that instead of flying its own missions, NASA should play a more limited and supportive role.

Produced by Natalie Dowzicky and Zach Weissmueller; shot by Issac Reese; edited by Danielle Thompson; additional graphics by Isaac Reese; sound editing by Ian Keyser.

Music Credits: "Main Theme" by Maik Thomas via Artlist; "River Buzz" by Taru via Artlist; "Life" by Angel Salazar via Artlist; "There is a Way" by Alon Peretz via Artlist; "What Do You See" by Sebastian Borromeo via Artlist; "Concrete Walls" by Sebastian Borromeo via Artlist; "Digital Dreams" by Jimmy Svensson via Artlist; "New World" by Angel Salazar via Artlist; "Delivered into Arrival" by Jay Ray via Artlist

Photo Credits: Mediadrumimages/Tiziou News Serv/ZUMA Press/Newscom; (NASA/Bill Ingalls)/Newscom; NASA/Heritage Space/Heritage Images AiWire/Newscom; Ricardo Watson / UPI Photo Service/Newscom; The Print Collector / Heritage Images/Newscom; NASA/Heritage Space/Heritage Images AiWire/Newscom; SIPA USA/NASA/Sipa USA/Newscom; NASA via CNP/Newscom; NASA/UPI/Newscom; Cover Images/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Bill Ingram/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; KEVIN DIETSCH/UPI/Newscom; Aaron Schwartz - CNP / MEGA / Newscom/RSSIL/Newscom; Reginald Mathalone/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; JP5\ZOB/WENN.com/Newscom; JOE MARINO/UPI/Newscom; Reginald Mathalone/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Mediadrumworld.Com/Omaze/Virgin/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Blue Origin/ZUMA Press/Newscom; SPACEX/UPI/Newscom; Blue Origin/Mega / Newscom/IBLIM/Newscom; NASA; NASA/ Jim Grossman; NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS; NASA/Bill Ingalls; NASA/Kim Shiflett; NASA/Glenn Benson; NASA/Dimitri Gerondidakis; NASA/Jude Guidry; NASA/Heritage Space/Heritage Images AiWire/Newscom

Loading comments...