SCOTUS revives case brought by postal worker seeking religious accommodations
The Supreme Court revived the case of a former mail carrier, an evangelical Christian, who said the United States Postal Service violated federal law by failing to reasonably accommodate his inability to work on Sundays. The court said unanimously that a lower court was too quick to deny the employee’s request for accommodation and should take another look at the impact the request would have on the Postal Service as a whole. The new ruling, in clarifying previous precedent for religious accommodations, will likely make it harder for an employer to refuse to accommodate the religious beliefs of an employee under Title VII of the civil rights law. The Supreme Court left the door open that the Postal Service might still prevail in the case, and the justices said they were leaving it to the lower court to revisit the case under the clarified standard.
-
1:10:19
Teaching Liberty
10 months agoSCOTUS clarifies the Right to Religious Exemptions in the workplace | Groff v. DeJoy
129 -
6:29
Tony Perkins
1 year agoStephanie Taub explains First Liberty Institute's SCOTUS case on a postal worker's religious freedom
17 -
3:10
JbQuinnon
1 year agoPostal Worker's Lawsuit Highlights Clash Between Religious Accommodation and Business Interests
1311 -
18:00
The Constitution Study
10 months ago380 - Supreme Court Upholds Employee’s Right to Religious Accommodation
399 -
14:22
America Out Loud
10 months agoReligious Liberty or Constitutional Malfeasance?
874 -
1:10:21
Teaching Liberty
10 months agoSCOTUS clarifies the Right to Religious Exemptions in the workplace | Groff v. DeJoy
11 -
2:11
BoogieFinger
11 months agoLegitimacy of ‘customer’ in SCOTUS gay rights case raises ethical, legal flags
6 -
1:57
One America News Network
2 years agoFormer high school football coach takes religious case to Supreme Court
1.55K22 -
1:27
WXYZ
3 years agoSCOTUS upholds law that allows employers to refuse birth control coverage on religious grounds
35 -
21:50
Robert Gouveia
3 years agoSCOTUS Warrant Ruling
1412