THE FEASENING - How Teddy Feaser Became a LOLcow

$UPPORT:
— Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/killallpedos
— Gumroad: https://killallpedos.gumroad.com

LINKS: https://linktr.ee/killallpedos

********************************

DESCRIPTION:

Introducing Theodore Matthew Feaser, AKA RedPillGangTV / RedPillGamingTV / RPG. Mr. Feaser is a LOLcow—a person who allows himself to be "milked" for the entertainment of an online audience, often by repeatedly overreacting to jokes, insults, or trolling. "The Feasening" explores Mr. Feaser's personality flaws and poor decision making, and how they ultimately contributed to him becoming a widely derided object of ridicule on the Internet. For anyone studying on how to avoid becoming a LOLcow, be sure to take notes on Teddy Feaser's character arc.

Background: Teddy Feaser was a long-time opponent of Nick Fuentes and his America First cult. A self-described "serious" Conservative political streamer, Feaser was originally a supporter of Fuentes's until he was personally rejected by Fuentes. In response, Feaser became a "Stan"—a jilted fan who attacks their idol out of spite. For two years, Feaser levied every criticism he could muster (most of them valid) against Fuentes and AF. Feaser found solidarity with an amorphous group of online trolls—The A-Logs—who also frequently criticized AF. Feaser's romance came to an abrupt end when he discovered that the A-Logs were actually just a bunch of random Internet trolls. Ultimately, as a result of being teased, Feaser ended up withdrawing most of his criticism of Fuentes and backtracking on most of his anti-AF positions. His beliefs, principles, values, etc. all flipped on a dime, because Feaser's quest for a "serious" political movement was nothing more than a quest for personal validation.

In the end, Teddy Feaser failed at becoming a serious political streamer. He likewise failed in his quest for personal validation. He succeeded only in humiliating himself for the amusement of a few trolls. To this day, it remains Theodore Matthew Feaser's greatest accomplishment. Thanks for the laughs, Ted.

********************************

OUTLINE:

00:00 - Introduction
01:25 - Background—Teddy Loves Nick
02:50 - Background—Teddy Hates Nick
06:34 - Don't Say "Teddy Feaser"
09:45 - Don't Feed the Trolls
11:05 - Ban Anyone Who Says "Teddy Feaser"
12:57 - Ban Anyone Who Doesn't Ban Anyone Who Says "Teddy Feaser"
16:50 - Destroy Anyone Who Says "Teddy Feaser"
18:25 - Relationships: Feasered
19:10 - Dignity: Feasered
19:43 - Integrity: Feasered
25:46 - Legal Fease
27:32 - Rent-free
30:31 - Pathetic
31:49 - "Imagine" (Feasered Edition)
33:12 - "Imagine" (Feazy Redux)
35:02 - Feaser on Cozy
36:31 - Mexican Psycho
37:16 - Teddy Come Home
38:35 - Special Thanks / Credits

********************************

PRIVACY DISCLAIMER: This video exists for informational and comedic purposes. It is not intended to harass, demean, humiliate, or otherwise harm anyone. All information in this video is publicly available, and does not implicate anyone’s legitimate expectation of privacy. Nevertheless, certain items of information have been withheld to minimize unnecessary negative attention to innocent third parties. The creators of this video have taken great care in balancing its informational and entertainment objectives with countervailing interests.

COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER: All uses of copyrighted works in this video fall under the legal definition of "fair use." See 17 U.S.C § 107; Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994); Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1998); Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013).

GENERAL DISCLAIMER: Hetero Nick is a FICTIONAL animated cartoon character. The views he expresses are not those of Nicholas Fuentes or of Kill All Pedos. This video is intended strictly for INFORMATIONAL and COMEDIC purposes and is not intended to threaten or harass anyone. See Elonis v. United States, 575 U.S. ___ (2015); United States v. Bagdasarian, 652 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2011) (a "true threat" must have objectively threatening language and include a subjective intent to intimidate); United States v. Doggart, 906 F.3d 506, 510 (6th Cir. 2018) (“an expression of an intent to inflict loss or harm”); United States v. White, 810 F.3d 212, 220 (4th Cir. 2016) (“serious expression of an intent to do harm”); United States v. Heineman, 767 F.3d 970, 972 (10th Cir. 2014) (“declaration of intention, purpose, design, goal, or determination to inflict [bodily injury] on another”). The creators of this video are not affiliated with any political movements or groups. The creators of this video do not endorse any particular course of action, ESPECIALLY NOT VIOLENCE.

Enjoy!