Black Genocide So End Of The Black Race U.S.A. Black Marry Fat White Women Only

So End Of The Black Race U.S.A. Black Marry Fat White Women Only Beauty of Black Men Being With White Women Things I Love and Hate About It Genuine question here, why is it that black men go for the bigger blond white girl and women. Every black guy I know is in a relationship with a big white girl or very fat white women. Not got a problem with that, but what I’m saying is WHAT IS THE REASON? One black guy I know is extremely good looking a real handsome chap, but he wants to be with a girl who is morbidly obese. She is around 30 stone and cannot get out of bed without the help of a winch device. Please can you tell me WHY? Why do black men love fat white women.

Show more

The End Black Family 40 Years of Lies ? The real truth is black man 72% of them will not marry a black woman at all... every (maybe rape her) but not marry her and yes its very sad ?

The black community's 72 percent rate eclipses that of most other groups: 17 percent of Asians, 29 percent of whites, 53 percent of Hispanics and 66 percent of Native Americans were born to unwed mothers in 2008, the most recent year for which government figures are available. The rate for the overall U.S. population was 41 percent.

The drug epidemic sent disproportionate numbers of black men to prison, and crushed the job opportunities for those who served their time. Women don't want to marry men who can't provide for their families, and welfare laws created a financial incentive for poor mothers to stay single. If you remove these inequalities, some say, the 72 percent unwed.... So maybe slavery is good... because you get food stamps and a bad home and TV and all the drugs i want and maybe a rape too.

The short answer is socioeconomics. Actually MOST men used to be into thick women too, but the only reason middle class and wealthy (mostly white) men nowadays are into skinny women is due to wealth. It takes money to be fit and healthy in the modern day and age. Thus, that's become the standard of not only "attractiveness," but social status. If this was 500 years ago, or we were living in a food scarcity age, then thicker women would be the thing. And as far as races go, who do you think are lowest income races in both North America and western Europe? That's right, black and Hispanic men.

But it's not like it's a choice. It's been subconsciously ingrained into us since birth and is reinforced based on what we grew up around. That is WHY I said middle class and rich white men (as well as those in other races, to be honest), like skinny women. Because that's what's been deemed "attractive" by society at large, especially wealthy and elite women who can afford daily gym visits and personal trainers, instead of working some crappy job for 8-16 hours a day.

But even beyond that, there's another more simpler answer: We like tits and ass. More tits and ass, means more cushin' for the pushin'! And frankly, men are allowed to like whatever the f*ck they want. And so are women. So long as you aren't putting down others for their choices in what they like, or screwing over people by exploiting them (particularly, exploiting simps and cuckolds).

Beauty of Black Men Being With White Women And Things I Love and Hate About It. It really has been a thing between us since slave days, and I don’t think anybody really knows why. Or there may be more than one reason. We’ve always been fascinated with each other, and it hasn’t always been good or bad. They like our skin, black male frame, our voices, and thick lips. We like their beige skin and the contrast of brown and black hair against it, the way they pull their hair behind their ear, their pink lips, and their voices. We are perpetually appealing to each other.

In today’s times certain groups of females have developed their own hateful ideas for why black men and white women have been coming together, only to slander black men and hold white women in contempt. You do have some negative cases for the reasons some come together, but it goes deeper than that for most of us. So for me, I want to detail what I love about coffee and cream, but also the things I do dislike. There'll be some who have to hate this post, but hey, let 'em have at it if it helps them sleep better tonight. The rest of us will celebrate the message.

How it is for me...
For me personally, liking white women goes a little deeper than skin. A lot of it has to do with my upbringing. My family is black, but we are actually very diverse and more open-minded, plus our sister was half white. Even our mom taught us that it's okay if we're not interested in dating our own, and that there's nothing wrong with being different. So although I do like white chicks, I'm also obsessed with Latinas, Filippinas, Malaysians, and East Europeans. A lot of this is also due to the fact that I've always been interested in other cultures and societies. So over time you develop more of a desire to connect with different people, especially when you're different from your own.

The sexual pull...
There is a beautiful contrast of light and dark in relationships between black men and white women, it does have a very nice look, even if neither of them may be very special-looking. It also has the beauty of the fact that these two people of different races can't get enough of each other and that race won't keep them apart. I have known some white women who honestly say they're not really into black men though, and it really doesn't bother me. Some black men think it's racist, but it is what it is. Some of them just aren't interested, and I'm not offended by that.

I must admit that I do like the way a lot of white girls are either obsessed with us or turned on by our blackness. It is flattering. But we black men feel the same way. Even as a little boy meeting white girls in school and in predominantly white communities gave me a spark and made me want to impress them. Neither one of us can get enough of each other. I do like that. We're both so damn curious. We want to see what sex with each other looks like or feels like both mentally and physically. We both want to show our passion and vulnerabilities admitting themselves to each other in the sheets. We can't help it. And I don't know about you, but there is something particularly sexy about a white girl on her knees being subservient and giving a black man a blowjob.

White girls can look good too...
I do like those beige beauties, but not because I think white skin is superior to dark. In truth I think black women are actually some of the most physically beautiful women in the world with some of the best bodies, and the big-breast factor in our women is always appealing. But I also like beige girls because of their own beauty, especially when they have dark hair. And, yeah, it is always nice to see a white girl with big, heavy breasts, which the appeal in that probably does come from the fact that I've grown up in a black community.

However, the really thin ones who are crazy about being health conscious and are vegetarians or vegans are not so special-looking, lol. Some of them have pretty faces, but they tend to look somewhat ill. A white girl with a normal body is fine to me. And I do like redheads, who doesn't? I also notice redheads tend to be busty ;-)

Character and personality...
Although every person, even of the same race, has a different personality, there is a kind of character and personality that can be stronger in different races. One of the things I like about white girls is their bright expressiveness and enthusiasm. Sure, some are blahzay and not very colorful, but in a lot of my experience there is a difference. Some women of other races tend not to be very surprised about anything, or don't express much surprise, but with white women they can be quite expressive. I love the way they just burst into major thrills when they see my artwork and 3D origami models that I make. They really enjoy it and get really animated about it, to the point where I can be shy about it in public, lol. Some of them will buy it from me right on the spot, and they like it so much that they will even pay more than the price I set for it. I do notice that white females tend to have an appreciation for stuff like that.

Even in conversations, white girls tend to be more enthusiastic, which I do like. Though sometimes depending on the topic and the mood, I just want to close my ears, lol. But overall their enthusiasm keeps me sprung and can even make my day. Even their voices can be sexy - not the ones that talk super proper or Clueless-like lol - just the basic sound of the white female voice.

Being a lady...
Although you have many white females today all about independence and giving up feminine values, you also still have many others who don't mind cooking, being a feminine, loving mom, being into traditional feminine activities, and being ladylike. Some black people who oppose white women and think black women are better call this being "docile," and even say it about Latinas and Asian women. It does still seem to be that white women still care more about feminine values in many ways, and I do appreciate that.

Even in Europe, particularly Eastern Europe, they are very traditional and feminine, and their men seem to take it for granted, especially in Russia where domestic violence against women is high. No wonder they want to be taken care of by men in the west who are more liberal. American women try to say European women are gold-diggers and only want us for the money, yet American women marry and divorce at much higher rates, and also for the money, so they're not in any position to accuse anybody. Russian men have low life expectancies, terrible alcohol problems, and take their problems out on their women. So they really have no right getting so angry when Russian women want to leave, or would rather want to be with black men who come into the country.

The things I hate...
Wannabes:

If it's one thing I absolutely cannot stand, it's the white girls who feel like they need to be black in order to be with black men. They start talking black and acting black, and will try to put on that pinched, stern face when they're with their kids in public, because they see the ghetto black mothers doing it so they try to imitate it too, and say the same kinds of things, "Get ova here 'fore I whoop your ass!" or "Disrespect me again and watch me slam your mothafukcin' ass in the floor." I hate that shit so much. It's like I always say: just because you have a black boyfriend and some half black babies does not mean you have to talk and act black!

Some try to justify it and say "It's just who I am," just because they like black people or grew up around black people. And then others do it to fit in, especially with their black girlfriends so they'll be more accepted, knowing that black women have slandered white women for being normal white with the way they talk and act. It's weakness on the part of black women to only accept a white girl into the circle if she acts like them, showing no tolerance for different people, but it's also weakness on the part of any white girl to be afraid of being real and choosing to make a fool of herself acting like a whole other race.

Black men's need for big butts:

This is one of the most annoying things about coffee and cream relationships. A lot of black men are ass men, and you have the ones who will date a white girl just because she has a big butt, even if she's not attractive. I feel so alone sometimes because most of my black male friends are ass men and I'm a tits man.

There is a tendency among a lot of black men to want to date a big girl because of their need to s*domize a big butt, and I'm just not one of them. No doubt, nice full female butts can be very nice, especially on Latinas for me, but I don't need them to have it. And while I do like big breasts on white girls, I don't actually seek them out nor would I date them just for that. I've known some busty, sexually attractive white women I would still never date because of their foul, stuck up, bitchy character, which that alone repelled me. I know how to draw the line.

Black men who like to sport:

I also dislike the brothas who like having a white girl on their arm just to show off to friends. These are usually the guys in the ghetto, who aren't exposed to white girls too regularly, and feel like they've really won a prize that a white girl was into him despite his ghetto-ness and community. They like to make a show of their relationship in public by kissing and touching and hugging and calling her "boo" loud enough for the rest of us to hear. But then, the fact that white girls go for those guys and are okay with the advertisement says they like it just as much.

Some white girls just want to use black men:

Some white girls are not genuine about their attraction to black men. For them it is all about the sex. You do still have a lot of them that hear about our penises being bigger and they think they've just got to have it, and it's not impressive to me. And it's also contradictory: they don't want to be objectified for being blonde or as a white female sex toy on a pedestal, yet they will objectify black men for their genitals. Some white women have even told me they themselves are annoyed by other white women doing that, and say it's disrespectful and unfair to us as black men.

White women like that are also the same ones who would never stand up for black men or black people period when it really comes down to it. They like the sexual aspect of a black man, but on the wider scale of issues, we're just another n-word to them they really could care less about. We don't matter to them as a person.

White women who like hoods:

Similar to the previous one, what's also annoying are the white women who like black men, but only if they're hoods or thugs. In their minds, they think a ghetto black man is the epitome of a real man or a strong man who knows what to do or is somehow smarter than a white man. White women like this couldn't make bigger fools of themselves, and show the truth about their own class and ethics.

You even have some who are sophisticated, have careers, and appear like clean, decent upper class white females, but in their private lives they like hoods and like having them over at their apartments on the weekends so they can fukc all day. White women like this are the scum of the earth. They use them for the sex and think hoods are better in bed or are willing to do all the gritty, dominant stuff she wants - which hoods will do. Both are foul to me, and she deserves to be in the projects of Anacostia and Congress Heights just as much as he does.

Coffee and cream is beautiful... Despite these downsides, black men and white women together is still a sexy and beautiful age-old classic, and many relationships between them are loving and genuine, sometimes more than same-race relationships. Learning can be very valuable too, as it also offers each other the perspectives of the other races, and a look at their worlds. It's wonderful when white mothers are humble and acknowledge the racist world out there enough to teach their biracial children that they can face challenges because of it, and care about their biracial sons' safety in police violence issues just as much as they would if he were white. It's also great when a black man can be welcomed by her family with open, loving arms, accepting him just as much as if he were white, and even better when they don't care that his kids are half black.

So, this take is about a black male trying to please themselves and saying that white women are wanting them and black men are the best and a gift for the white woman? This take is made for the ego fantasies of black boys against white men and with a racial fetish in white woman who seems to give support for this but imagine all the hatred if this were made by a white male for women of any race, this take is disgusting and typical of blacks from America. Or I'm crazy and in American culture black men really have fantasies of being worshipped and desired by white women and all pornographic and American culture of white men being losers, white women craving blacks and black men being superior male is truth, because every time who i see something about blacks is a black men trying to portray themselves like a gift for the woman who is desperate wanting the black, basically a racial ego fantasy of every day and the whites are some sort of inferior man for blacks in American culture.

On Brazil black men are boring and the least desired between all women and black women usually end with blacks because have no choice and Americans are obsessed in try to force the racial and ego fantasies of black men who is basically wanting to imagine the black men being desired above the white men, wanting to fantasize about black men being a gift for the woman, when you are nothing but American forced politics, I don't know about the racial fantasy of america with Black men above the white male and the white woman like you say wanting the black because the white woman think that the black male is superior over the white male like you said in your racial fantasies about the mind of white woman about black men being better than white males in their mind.

very interesting. i dont usually read a lot of mytakes but this one really caught my attention bc its super relatable... there's a lot of shade that gets thrown at people in mixed relationships. a lot of it goes unnoticed, but there is a lot that people do to let it b known. i've never been one to judge other people by what they like, so when people do it to me, it honestly gets under my skin a little bit... i always wonder WHY. its a sad thing, really bc at the end of the day its nobodys business and nobody should feel the need for why two people different, or not, should be together...
i agree with Rissyanne just a little bit about the back handed compliments... but thats just human nature to take things negatively and get defensive.
my husband (a black man) has said a lot of the same things u have said, but some of them were new and its nice to hear other ppls thoughts about it. always interesting and kinda nice to know that there are people out there who think outside the "date ur own kind" and support mixed relationships...
that was a ramble. i apologize. lol.

This is good to know. Because true love comes from within yourself & not outside. Everyone in this world has their own favorite type of person that they really feel connected too & happy with because that's what makes them happy. Lots of people go on to judge others because of their own disapproval of someone else's love lives between 2 people from different worlds & that's just sad. In my opinion, I will say that if someone doesn't like who you're dating then you should kick that person to the curve & find a real friend who would support you through everything in everyday lives. Only a real friend & family member can understand that concept. As for me I'm a young black man who loves both black & white women because I see them both as really special women in their own special ways. It's not about color; it's mainly about finding your true soulmate that you would be more than willing to give your life too.

Intermarriage in the U.S. 50 Years After Loving v. Virginia
One-in-six newlyweds are married to someone of a different race or ethnicity.

Terminology
The term “intermarriage” refers to marriages between a Hispanic and a non-Hispanic, or marriages between non-Hispanic spouses who come from the following different racial groups: white, black, Asian, American Indian, multiracial or some other race.1

In the racial and ethnic classification system used for this report, individuals are classified first by ethnicity (defined as whether someone is Hispanic or not) and then by race. As such, all references to whites, blacks, Asians, American Indians, multiracial persons or persons of some other race include those who are not Hispanic; Hispanics may be of any race. So, for instance, in the 2015 American Community Survey, 4% of black newlyweds reported that they are also Hispanic. These people are categorized as “Hispanic” in this analysis, and if they are married to someone who identifies as a non-Hispanic black, both are counted as being in an intermarriage. By the same token, if a Hispanic black person marries a non-Hispanic white person, their marriage would be classified as one between a Hispanic and a white person rather than a black and a white person.

Beginning with the 2000 census, individuals could choose to identify with more than one group in response to the race question. In this analysis, these multiracial people are treated as a separate race category, different from those who identify as a single race, including those who identify as “some other race.” (As with single race individuals, a multiracial person who also identifies as Hispanic would be classified as Hispanic.)

In the secondary data analysis, the term “Asian” includes native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders; “American Indian” includes Alaska natives. In the analysis of the Pew Research Center surveys and the General Social Survey, Asian includes anyone who self-identifies as Asian.

“Newlyweds” or people who are “recently married” or “newly married” include those who got married in the 12 months prior to being surveyed for 2008 to 2015 data. In all other years, newlyweds are those who married in that same year. Data analyses for 1967 through 1980 are limited to newlyweds who married for the first time, while analyses for subsequent years include people marrying for the first time and those who have remarried.

People born in one of the 50 states or the District of Columbia or who were born abroad to at least one American parent are classified as “U.S. born.” All others are classified as “foreign born,” including those born in Puerto Rico or other United States territories. While these individuals are U.S. citizens by birth, the convention of categorizing persons living in the U.S. who were born in U.S. territories as foreign born has been used by the United Nations. The terms “foreign born” and “immigrant” are used interchangeably.

In the analysis of educational attainment, “some college” includes those with an associate degree or those who attended college but did not obtain a degree. “High school or less” includes those who have attained a high school diploma or its equivalent, such as a General Education Development (GED) certificate.

“Metro areas” in this report are classified based on metropolitan statistical areas (MSA), which consist of at least one large urban core with 50,000 people or more, as well as neighboring areas that are socially and economically linked to the core area. They are a proxy for urban and suburban areas.

For Pew Research Center survey data, references to urban, suburban and rural are based on the respondent’s ZIP code. Urban residents are those who live within the central city of an MSA. Suburban residents are those who live within an MSA county, but are not within the central city. Rural residents are those who do not live in an MSA county.

In 2015, 17% of all U.S. newlyweds had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, marking more than a fivefold increase since 1967, when 3% of newlyweds were intermarried, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.2 In that year, the U.S. Supreme Court in the Loving v. Virginia case ruled that marriage across racial lines was legal throughout the country. Until this ruling, interracial marriages were forbidden in many states.

More broadly, one-in-ten married people in 2015 – not just those who recently married – had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. This translates into 11 million people who were intermarried. The growth in intermarriage has coincided with shifting societal norms as Americans have become more accepting of marriages involving spouses of different races and ethnicities, even within their own families.

The most dramatic increases in intermarriage have occurred among black newlyweds. Since 1980, the share who married someone of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled from 5% to 18%. White newlyweds, too, have experienced a rapid increase in intermarriage, with rates rising from 4% to 11%. However, despite this increase, they remain the least likely of all major racial or ethnic groups to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity.

Asian and Hispanic newlyweds are by far the most likely to intermarry in the U.S. About three-in-ten Asian newlyweds3 (29%) did so in 2015, and the share was 27% among recently married Hispanics. For these groups, intermarriage is even more prevalent among the U.S. born: 39% of U.S.-born Hispanic newlyweds and almost half (46%) of U.S.-born Asian newlyweds have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity.

For blacks and Asians, stark gender differences in intermarriage
Among blacks, intermarriage is twice as prevalent for male newlyweds as it is for their female counterparts. While about one-fourth of recently married black men (24%) have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, this share is 12% among recently married black women.

There are dramatic gender differences among Asian newlyweds as well, though they run in the opposite direction – Asian women are far more likely to intermarry than their male counterparts. In 2015, just over one-third (36%) of newlywed Asian women had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, compared with 21% of newlywed Asian men.

In contrast, among white and Hispanic newlyweds, the shares who intermarry are similar for men and women. Some 12% of recently married white men and 10% of white women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, and among Hispanics, 26% of newly married men and 28% of women do.

A more diverse population and shifting attitudes are contributing to the rise of intermarriage
The rapid increases in intermarriage rates for recently married whites and blacks have played an important role in driving up the overall rate of intermarriage in the U.S. However, the growing share of the population that is Asian or Hispanic, combined with these groups’ high rates of intermarriage, is further boosting U.S. intermarriage overall. Among all newlyweds, the share who are Hispanic has risen by 9 percentage points since 1980, and the share who are Asian has risen 4 points. Meanwhile, the share of newlyweds who are white has dropped by 15 points.

Attitudes about intermarriage are changing as well. In just seven years, the share of adults saying that the growing number of people marrying someone of a different race is good for society has risen 15 points, to 39%, according to a new Pew Research Center survey conducted Feb. 28-March 12, 2017.

The decline in opposition to intermarriage in the longer term has been even more dramatic, a new Pew Research Center analysis of data from the General Social Survey has found. In 1990, 63% of nonblack adults surveyed said they would be very or somewhat opposed to a close relative marrying a black person; today the figure stands at 14%. Opposition to a close relative entering into an intermarriage with a spouse who is Hispanic or Asian has also declined markedly since 2000, when data regarding those groups first became available. The share of nonwhites saying they would oppose having a family member marry a white person has edged downward as well.

Intermarriage somewhat more common among the college educated
In 1980, the rate of intermarriage did not differ markedly by educational attainment among newlyweds. Since that time, however, a modest intermarriage gap has emerged. In 2015, 14% of newlyweds with a high school diploma or less were married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, compared with 18% of those with some college and 19% of those with a bachelor’s degree or more.

The educational gap is most striking among Hispanics: While almost half (46%) of Hispanic newlyweds with a bachelor’s degree were intermarried in 2015, this share drops to 16% for those with a high school diploma or less – a pattern driven partially, but not entirely, by the higher share of immigrants among the less educated. Intermarriage is also slightly more common among black newlyweds with a bachelor’s degree (21%) than those with some college (17%) or a high school diploma or less (15%).

Among recently married Asians, however, the pattern is different – intermarriage is far more common among those with some college (39%) than those with either more education (29%) or less education (26%). Among white newlyweds, intermarriage rates are similar regardless of educational attainment.

Other key findings
The most common racial or ethnic pairing among newlywed intermarried couples is one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). Next most common are one white and one Asian spouse (15%) and one white and one multiracial spouse (12%).
Newlyweds living in metropolitan areas are more likely to be intermarried than those in non-metropolitan areas (18% vs. 11%). This pattern is driven entirely by whites; Hispanics and Asians are more likely to intermarry if they live in non-metro areas. The rates do not vary by place of residence for blacks.
Among black newlyweds, the gender gap in intermarriage increases with education: For those with a high school diploma or less, 17% of men vs. 10% of women are intermarried, while among those with a bachelor’s degree, black men are more than twice as likely as black women to intermarry (30% vs. 13%).
Among newlyweds, intermarriage is most common for those in their 30s (18%). Even so, 13% of newlyweds ages 50 and older are married to someone of a different race or ethnicity.
There is a sharp partisan divide in attitudes about interracial marriage. Roughly half (49%) of Democrats and independents who lean to the Democratic Party say the growing number of people of different races marrying each other is a good thing for society. Only 28% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents share that view.

Trends and patterns in intermarriage In 1967, when miscegenation laws were overturned in the United States, 3% of all newlyweds were married to someone of a different race or ethnicity. Since then, intermarriage rates have steadily climbed. By 1980, the share of intermarried newlyweds had about doubled to 7%. And by 2015 the number had risen to 17%.4

All told, more than 670,000 newlyweds in 2015 had recently entered into a marriage with someone of a different race or ethnicity. By comparison, in 1980, the first year for which detailed data are available, about 230,000 newlyweds had done so.

The long-term annual growth in newlyweds marrying someone of a different race or ethnicity has led to dramatic increases in the overall number of people who are presently intermarried – including both those who recently married and those who did so years, or even decades, earlier. In 2015, that number stood at 11 million – 10% of all married people. The share has tripled since 1980, when 3% of married people – about 3 million altogether – had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity.

Intermarriage varies by race and ethnicity
Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds. Even though intermarriage has not been increasing for these two groups, they remain far more likely than black or white newlyweds to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity. About three-in-ten Asian newlyweds (29%) have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. The same is true of 27% of Hispanics.

For newly married Hispanics and Asians, the likelihood of intermarriage is closely related to whether they were born in the U.S. or abroad. Among the half of Hispanic newlyweds who are immigrants, 15% married a non-Hispanic. In comparison, 39% of the U.S. born did so. The pattern is similar among Asian newlyweds, three-fourths of whom are immigrants. While 24% of foreign-born Asian newlyweds have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, this share rises to 46% among the U.S. born.

The changing racial and ethnic profile of U.S. newlyweds is linked to growth in intermarriage
Significant growth in the Hispanic and Asian populations in the U.S. since 1980, coupled with the high rates of intermarriage among Hispanic and Asian newlyweds, has been an important factor driving the rise in intermarriage. Since that time, the share of all newlyweds that were Hispanic rose 9 percentage points, from 8% to 17%, and the share that were Asian grew from 2% to 6%. At the same time, the share of white newlyweds declined by 15 points and the share of black newlyweds held steady.

The size of each racial and ethnic group can also influence intermarriage rates by affecting the pool of potential marriage partners in the “marriage market,” which consists of all newlyweds and all unmarried adults combined.5 For example, whites, who comprise the largest share of the U.S. population, may be more likely to marry someone of the same race simply because most potential partners are white. And members of smaller racial or ethnic groups may be more likely to intermarry because relatively few potential partners share their race or ethnicity.

But size alone cannot totally explain intermarriage patterns. Hispanics, for instance, made up 17% of the U.S. marriage market in 2015, yet their newlywed intermarriage rates were comparable to those of Asians, who comprised only 5% of the marriage market. And while the share of the marriage market comprised of Hispanics has grown markedly since 1980, when it was 6%, their intermarriage rate has remained stable. Perhaps more striking – the share of blacks in the marriage market has remained more or less constant (15% in 1980, 16% in 2015), yet their intermarriage rate has more than tripled.

For blacks and Asians, big gender gaps in intermarriage
While there is no overall gender difference in intermarriage among newlyweds6, starkly different gender patterns emerge for some major racial and ethnic groups.

One of the most dramatic patterns occurs among black newlyweds: Black men are twice as likely as black women to have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity (24% vs. 12%). This gender gap has been a long-standing one – in 1980, 8% of recently married black men and 3% of their female counterparts were married to someone of a different race or ethnicity.

A significant gender gap in intermarriage is apparent among Asian newlyweds as well, though the gap runs in the opposite direction: Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do. A substantial gender gap in intermarriage was also present in 1980, when 39% of newly married Asian women and 26% of their male counterparts were married to someone of a different race or ethnicity.

Among Asian newlyweds, these gender differences exist for both immigrants (15% men, 31% women) and the U.S. born (38% men, 54% women). While the gender gap among Asian immigrants has remained relatively stable, the gap among the U.S. born has widened substantially since 1980, when intermarriage stood at 46% among newlywed Asian men and 49% among newlywed Asian women.

Among white newlyweds, there is no notable gender gap in intermarriage – 12% of men and 10% of women had married someone of a different race or ethnicity in 2015. The same was true in 1980, when 4% of recently married men and 4% of recently married women had intermarried.

As is the case among whites, intermarriage is about equally common for newlywed Hispanic men and women. In 2015, 26% of recently married Hispanic men were married to a non-Hispanic, as were 28% of their female counterparts. These intermarriage rates have changed little since 1980.

A growing educational gap in intermarriage
In 2015 the likelihood of marrying someone of a different race or ethnicity was somewhat higher among newlyweds with at least some college experience than among those with a high school diploma or less. While 14% of the less-educated group was married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, this share rose to 18% among those with some college experience and 19% among those with at least a bachelor’s degree. This marks a change from 1980, when there were virtually no educational differences in the likelihood of intermarriage among newlyweds.7

The same patterns and trends emerge when looking separately at newlywed men and women; there are no overall gender differences in intermarriage by educational attainment. In 2015, 13% of recently married men with a high school diploma or less and 14% of women with the same level of educational attainment had a spouse of another race or ethnicity, as did 19% of recently married men with some college and 18% of comparable women. Among newlyweds with a bachelor’s degree, 20% of men and 18% of women were intermarried.

Strong link between education and intermarriage for Hispanics
The association between intermarriage and educational attainment among newlyweds varies across racial and ethnic groups. For instance, among Hispanic newlyweds, higher levels of education are strongly linked with higher rates of intermarriage. While 16% of those with a high school diploma or less are married to a non-Hispanic, this share more than doubles to 35% among those with some college. And it rises to 46% for those with a bachelor’s degree or higher.

This pattern may be partly driven by the fact that Hispanics with low levels of education are disproportionately immigrants who are in turn less likely to intermarry. However, rates of intermarriage increase as education levels rise for both the U.S. born and the foreign born: Among immigrant Hispanic newlyweds, intermarriage rates range from 9% among those with a high school diploma or less up to 33% for those with a bachelor’s degree or more; and among the U.S. born, rates range from 32% for those with a high school diploma or less up to 56% for those with a bachelor’s degree or more.

There is no significant gender gap in intermarriage among newly married Hispanics across education levels or over time.

For blacks, intermarriage has increased most among those with no college experience
For black newlyweds, intermarriage rates are slightly higher among those with a bachelor’s degree or more (21%). Among those with some college, 17% have married someone of a different race or ethnicity, as have 15% of those with a high school diploma or less.

Intermarriage has risen dramatically at all education levels for blacks, with the biggest proportional increases occurring among those with the least education. In 1980, just 5% of black newlyweds with a high school diploma or less had intermarried – a number that has since tripled. Rates of intermarriage have more than doubled at higher education levels, from 7% among those with some college experience and 8% among those with a bachelor’s degree.

Among black newlyweds, there are distinct gender differences in intermarriage across education levels. In 2015, the rate of intermarriage varied by education only slightly among recently married black women: 10% of those with some college or less had intermarried compared with 13% of those with a bachelor’s degree or more. Meanwhile, among newly married black men, higher education is clearly associated with higher intermarriage rates. While 17% of those with a high school diploma or less had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity in 2015, this share rose to 24% for those with some college and to 30% for those with a bachelor’s degree or higher.

Asians with some college are the most likely to intermarry
While intermarriage is associated with higher education levels for Hispanics and blacks, this is not the case among Asian newlyweds. Those with some college are by far the most likely to have married someone of a different race or ethnicity – 39% in 2015 had done so, compared with about one-fourth (26%) of those with only a high school diploma or less and 29% of those with a bachelor’s degree.

This pattern reflects dramatic changes since 1980. At that time, Asians with a high school diploma or less were the most likely to intermarry; 36% did so, compared with 32% of those with some college and 25% of those with a bachelor’s degree.

Asian newlyweds with some college are somewhat less likely to be immigrants, and this may contribute to the higher rates of intermarriage for this group. However, even among recently married Asian immigrants with some college, 33% had intermarried, compared with 22% of those with a high school diploma or less and 23% of those with a bachelor’s degree or more.8

There are sizable gender gaps in intermarriage across all education levels among recently married Asians, with the biggest proportional gap occurring among those with a high school diploma or less. Newlywed Asian women in this category are more than twice as likely as their male counterparts to have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity (36% vs. 14%). The gaps decline somewhat at higher education levels, but even among college graduates, 36% of women are intermarried compared with 21% of men.

Among whites, little difference in intermarriage rates by education level
Among white newlyweds, the likelihood of intermarrying is fairly similar regardless of education level. One-in-ten of those with a high school diploma or less have a spouse of another race or ethnicity, as do 11% of those with some college experience and 12% of those with at least a bachelor’s degree. Rates don’t vary substantially among white newlywed men or women with some college or less, though men with a bachelor’s degree are somewhat more likely to intermarry than comparable women (14% vs. 10%).

Intermarriage is slightly less common at older ages
Nearly one-in-five newlyweds in their 30s (18%) are married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, as are 16% of those in their teens or 20s and those in their 40s. Among newlyweds ages 50 and older, many of whom are likely remarrying, the share intermarried is a bit lower (13%).

The lower rate of intermarriage among older newlyweds in 2015 is largely attributable to a lower rate among women. While intermarriage rates ranged from 16% to 18% among women younger than 50, rates dropped to 12% among those 50 and older. Among recently married men, however, intermarriage did not vary substantially by age.

Intermarriage varies little by age for white and Hispanic newlyweds, but more striking patterns emerge among black and Asian newlyweds. While 22% of blacks ages 15 to 29 are intermarried, this share drops incrementally, reaching a low of 13% among those ages 50 years or older. Among Asian newlyweds, a different pattern emerges. Intermarriage rises steadily from 25% among those ages 15 to 29 years to 42% among those in their 40s. For those 50 years and older, however, the rate drops to 32%.

A closer look at intermarriage among Asian newlyweds reveals that the overall age pattern of intermarriage – with the highest rates among those in their 40s – is driven largely by the dramatic age differences in intermarriage among newly married Asian women. More than half of newlywed Asian women in their 40s intermarry (56%), compared with 42% of those in their 30s and 46% of those 50 and older. Among Asian newlywed women younger than 30, 29% are intermarried. Among recently married Asian men, the rate of intermarriage doesn’t vary as much across age groups: 26% of those in their 40s are intermarried, compared with 20% of those in their 30s and those 50 and older. Among Asian newlywed men in their teens or 20s, 18% are intermarried.

Though the overall rate of intermarriage does not differ markedly by age among white newlyweds, a gender gap emerges at older ages. While recently married white men and women younger than 40 are about equally likely to be intermarried, a 4-point gap emerges among those in their 40s (12% men, 8% women), and recently married white men ages 50 and older are about twice as likely as their female counterparts to be married to someone of a different race or ethnicity (11% vs. 6%).

A similar gender gap in intermarriage emerges at older ages for Hispanic newlyweds. However, in this case it is newly married Hispanic women ages 50 and older who are more likely to intermarry than their male counterparts (32% vs. 26%). Among black newlyweds, men are consistently more likely than women to intermarry at all ages.

In metro areas, almost one-in-five newlyweds are intermarried
Intermarriage is more common among newlyweds in the nation’s metropolitan areas, which are located in and around large urban centers, than it is in non-metro areas9, which are typically more rural. About 18% of those living in a metro area are married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, compared with 11% of those living outside of a metro area. In 1980, 8% of newlyweds in metro areas were intermarried, compared with 5% of those in non-metro areas.

There are likely many reasons that intermarriage is more common in metro areas than in more rural areas. Attitudinal differences may play a role. In urban areas, 45% of adults say that more people of different races marrying each other is a good thing for society, as do 38% of those living in suburban areas (which are typically included in what the Census Bureau defines as metro areas). Among people living in rural areas, which are typically non-metro areas, fewer (24%) share this view.

Another factor is the difference in the racial and ethnic composition of each type of area. Non-metro areas have a relatively large share of white newlyweds (83% vs. 62% in metro areas), and whites are far less likely to intermarry than those of other races or ethnicities. At the same time, metro areas have larger shares of Hispanics and Asians, who have very high rates of intermarriage. While 26% of newlyweds in metro areas are Hispanic or Asian, this share is 10% for newlyweds in non-metro areas.

The link between place of residence and intermarriage varies dramatically for different racial and ethnic groups. The increased racial and ethnic diversity of metro areas means that the supply of potential spouses, too, will likely be more diverse. This fact may contribute to the higher rates of intermarriage for white metro area newlyweds, since the marriage market includes a relatively larger share of people who are nonwhite. Indeed, recently married whites are the only major group for which intermarriage is higher in metro areas. White newlyweds in metro areas are twice as likely as those in non-metro areas to have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity (12% vs. 6%).

In contrast, for Asians, the likelihood of intermarrying is higher in non-metro areas (47%) than metro areas (28%), due in part to the fact that the share of Asians in the marriage market is lower in non-metro areas. The same holds true among Hispanics. About one-third (32%) of Hispanic newlyweds in non-metro areas are intermarried compared with 25% in metro areas.

Among black newlyweds, intermarriage rates are identical for those living in metro and non-metro areas (18% each), even though blacks are a larger share of the marriage market in metro areas than in non-metro areas.

The largest share of intermarried couples include one Hispanic and one white spouse.
While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

That intermarriage patterns vary by gender becomes apparent when looking at a more detailed profile of intermarried couples that identifies the race or ethnicity of the husband separately from the race or ethnicity of the wife. A similar share of intermarried couples involve a white man and a Hispanic woman (22%) as involve a white woman and a Hispanic man (20%).

However, more notable gender differences emerge for some of the other couple profiles. For instance, while 11% of all intermarried couples involve a white man and an Asian woman, just 4% of couples include a white woman and an Asian man. And while about 7% of intermarried couples include a black man and a white woman, only 3% include a black woman and a white man.

Public views on intermarriage
As intermarriage grows more prevalent in the United States, the public has become more accepting of it. A growing share of adults say that the trend toward more people of different races marrying each other is generally a good thing for American society.10 At the same time, the share saying they would oppose a close relative marrying someone of a different race has fallen dramatically.

A new Pew Research Center survey finds that roughly four-in-ten adults (39%) now say that more people of different races marrying each other is good for society – up significantly from 24% in 2010. The share saying this trend is a bad thing for society is down slightly over the same period, from 13% to 9%. And the share saying it doesn’t make much of a difference for society is also down, from 61% to 52%. Most of this change occurred between 2010 and 2013; opinions have remained essentially the same since then.

Attitudes about interracial marriage vary widely by age. For example, 54% of those ages 18 to 29 say that the rising prevalence of interracial marriage is good for society, compared with about a quarter of those ages 65 and older (26%). In turn, older Americans are more likely to say that this trend doesn’t make much difference (60% of those ages 65 and older, compared with 42% of those 18 to 29) or that it is bad for society (14% vs. 5%, respectively).

Views on interracial marriage also differ by educational attainment. Americans with at least a bachelor’s degree are much more likely than those with less education to say more people of different races marrying each other is a good thing for society (54% of those with a bachelor’s degree or more vs. 39% of those with some college education and 26% of those with a high school diploma or less). Among adults with a high school diploma or less, 16% say this trend is bad for society, compared with 6% of those with some college experience and 4% of those with at least a bachelor’s degree.

Men are more likely than women to say the rising number of interracial marriages is good for society (43% vs. 34%) while women are somewhat more likely to say it’s a bad thing (12% vs. 7%). This is a change from 2010, when men and women had almost identical views. Then, about a quarter of each group (23% of men and 24% of women) said this was a good thing and 14% and 12%, respectively, said it was a bad thing.

Blacks (18%) are more likely than whites (9%) and Hispanics (3%) to say more people of different races marrying each other is generally a bad thing for society, though there are no significance differences by race or ethnicity on whether it is a good thing for society.

Among Americans who live in urban areas, 45% say this trend is a good thing for society, as do 38% of those in the suburbs; lower shares among those living in rural areas share this view (24%). In turn, rural Americans are more likely than those in urban or suburban areas to say interracial marriage doesn’t make much difference for society (63% vs. 49% and 51%, respectively).

The view that the rise in the number of interracial marriages is good for society is particularly prevalent among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents; 49% in this group say this, compared with 28% of Republicans and those who lean Republican. The majority of Republicans (60%) say it doesn’t make much of a difference, while 12% say this trend is bad for society. Among Democrats, 45% say it doesn’t make much difference while 6% say it’s bad thing. This difference persists when controlling for race. Among whites, Democrats are still much more likely than Republicans to say more interracial marriages are a good thing for society.

Americans are now much more open to the idea of a close relative marrying someone of a different race
Just as views about the impact of interracial marriage on society have evolved, Americans’ attitudes about what is acceptable within their own family have changed. A new Pew Research Center analysis of General Social Survey (GSS) data finds that the share of U.S. adults saying they would be opposed to a close relative marrying someone of a different race or ethnicity has fallen since 2000.

In 2000, 31% of Americans said they would oppose an intermarriage in their family.12 That share dropped to 9% in 2002 but climbed again to 16% in 2008. It has fallen steadily since, and now one-in-ten Americans say they would oppose a close relative marrying someone of a different race or ethnicity.

These modest changes over time belie much larger shifts when it comes to attitudes toward marrying people of specific races. As recently as 1990, roughly six-in-ten nonblack Americans (63%) said they would be opposed to a close relative marrying a black person. This share had been cut about in half by 2000 (at 30%), and halved again since then to stand at 14% today.

In 2000, one-in-five non-Asian adults said they would be opposed to a close relative marrying an Asian person, and a similar share of non-Hispanic adults (21%) said the same about a family member marrying a Hispanic person. These shares have dropped to around one-in-ten for each group in 2016.

Among nonwhite adults, the share saying they would be opposed to a relative marrying a white person stood at 4% in 2016, down marginally from 7% in 2000 when the GSS first included this item.

While these views have changed substantially over time, significant demographic gaps persist. Older adults are especially likely to oppose having a family member marry someone of a different race or ethnicity. Among those ages 65 and older, about one-in-five (21%) say they would be very or somewhat opposed to an intermarriage in their family, compared with one-in-ten of those ages 50 to 64, 7% of those 30 to 49 and only 5% of those 18 to 29.

Whites (12%) and blacks (9%) are more likely than Hispanics (3%) to say they would oppose a close relative marrying someone of a different race or ethnicity. Men are somewhat more likely than women to say this as well (13% vs. 8%).

Americans with less education are more likely to oppose an intermarriage in their family: 14% of adults with a high school diploma or less education say this, compared with 8% of those with some college education and those with a bachelor’s degree, each.

There are also large differences by political party, with Republicans and those who lean toward the Republican Party roughly twice as likely as Democrats and Democratic leaners to say they would oppose a close relative marrying someone of a different race (16% vs. 7%). Controlling for race, the gap is the same: Among whites, 17% of Republicans and 8% of Democrats say they would oppose an intermarriage in their family.

Maxine Waters, Antifa-BLM, God Bless America's Blacks Killing Blacks Candace Owen - Black Genocide So End Of The Black Race U.S.A. Black Marry Fat White Women Only !

https://rumble.com/v3bvmo1-maxine-waters-antifa-blm-god-bless-americas-blacks-killing-blacks-candace-o.html

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting the same result. It is so weird, I was writing this sentence right as Candace said this exact same thing!!! Wow, I'm just kinda freaked because it was the exact moment I finished the sentence. It's so true though. The extremist liberal thinking is getting old and not working. Intreresting that she mentions Maxine Waters said God Bless Blacks Killing Blacks, living outside the district she represents, in a 6 million dollar mansion. I have to wonder how she was able to afford that 6 million dollar mansion and how and why she doesn't live in the district she was elected to represent.

Maxine Waters, AOC, Antifa-BLM

Corrupt Organizations Part One Democratic Party Police Force Ku Klux Klan History

https://rumble.com/v385xne-corrupt-organizations-part-one-democratic-party-police-force-ku-klux-klan-h.html

The Ku Klux Klan is the oldest democratic party police force terrorist group in the United States. This secret society, created in 1865, has survived throughout the decades and has always managed to rise from its ashes. It has been making the news for over 150 years. 150 years of hatred, racism and horror. A cruel history whose demons still haunt America.
The Klan Was the Original ‘Election Police’ Days after blocking the advancement of vital voting rights legislation and corrupting the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Republican politicians are advancing their undemocratic agenda by advocating for the creation of “election police.”

Corrupt Organizations Part Two Democratic Party Police Force Ku Klux Klan History

https://rumble.com/v38b3dk-corrupt-organizations-part-two-democratic-party-police-force-ku-klux-klan-h.html

A tipping point of the 1960s voting rights movement was the march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge on March 7, 1965. Dr. Martin Luther King, John Lewis, and voting rights activists marching from Selma, Alabama, to the state’s capital were infamously attacked on what’s come to be known as “Bloody Sunday” by Southern police led by Theophilus Eugene “Bull” Connor, the president of the Alabama Public Service Commission. Americans nationwide saw for themselves as Connor’s goons attacked citizens protesting non-violently with bully clubs, dogs, and militarized vehicles. Lewis nearly died in the confrontation.

That August, the Voting Rights Act became law, and Black Americans could finally vote without the threat of government-sponsored or -sanctioned terrorism—that is, the voting police.

So Slavery Is Over ? So With Your Freedom ? You Kill & Rape Each Other No Go Zone

https://rumble.com/v30a5im-so-slavery-is-over-so-with-your-freedom-you-kill-and-rape-each-other-no-go-.html

Race, crime, and incarceration have long been linked in the United States. This page explores its various manifestations including African American participation in organized crime including in particular the rise of gangs and gang violence, African Americans and the prison system, its impact on black life, and the people and organizations engaged in challenging and changing that system. As with our pages on Black Lives Matter and Racial Violence in the United States, we are constantly updating and invite you to make suggestions on other examples that should be included.
https://www.blackpast.org/special-features/race-crime-and-incarceration-united-states/

Abortion millions black baby killed a year and its true the democrats party police who supported the ku klux klan are killings blacks today. This is the conscious act of millions blacks mother killing blacks baby's who are killing a human black life or a being inside the womb of the black mother, resulting in the death of the black embryo or a black fetus.

Black Abortions By The Numbers 20 million plus so far... God bless black women who love killing kids ?

So black mother love kill baby more than crime is doing. More than accidents. More than cancer, heart disease and AIDS. Abortion has taken more Black American lives than every other cause of death combined since 1973. In the United States, the abortion rate for Black women is more than 3 times that of White women. On average, more than 900 Black babies are aborted every day in our country. This tragedy continues to impact the population levels of African-Americans in the United States.

National Statistics
More than 20 million Black babies have been aborted since the 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision legalized abortion in our country.

Non-Hispanic Black women have a significantly higher abortion rate (23.8 per 1000 women of reproductive age) than that of Non-Hispanic Whites (6.6) and Hispanics (11.7).

38.4% of all reported abortions in the U.S. in 2019 were performed on Black women, however, only about 13.4% of the total population is Black.

African-Americans are no longer the nation’s largest minority group. Today, Hispanics have outpaced Blacks in population growth.

For every 1,000 live births, non-Hispanic Black women had 386 abortions. Non-Hispanic White women had 117 abortions/1,000 live births.

So a white cop killed a black person or not for rape or no lights on etc. ? - and its the end of the world to BLM and Antifa and lets burn the town down... But black mother killing 1,000 black baby a day... Democratic Party Police Force Ku Klux Klan and Other Groups Say God Bless black mother and blacks killing blacks and you are mad about 1 or 2 White Democratic Party Cop's and Police Force killing a black person in crime or not maybe a car jacking etc. wow !

The Democrats were the party of slavery, black codes, Jim Crow, and that miserable terrorist excrescence, the Ku Klux Klan. When you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party comes to mind?

The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynching's, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s.

President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, shared many views with the Klan. He re-segregated many federal agencies, and even screened the first movie ever played at the White House in February 18-1915 - the racist film “The Birth of a Nation,” originally entitled “The Clansman.” ( I love this film "Alexandria Ocasio Cortez") and its funny that president Joe Biden Say ( My favorite film is The Klansman 1974) with Cast: Lee Marvin, Richard Burton, and O. J. Simpson dressed as a KKK man in white face as a Klansmen Killer- yes the greatest movie ever made.

Joe Biden Said: ‘If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black’ So now, the Democratic Party prospers on the votes of the very people it has spent much of its history oppressing.

Surgical abortion is an action that surgically kills a black baby while she is growing in her mother's womb, while chemical abortion is an action that chemically kills a black baby either before or after she implants in her mother's womb. In 2003, the Federal Government passed the Partial-Abortion Act Ban, which prohibits a specific abortion procedure (intact dilation and evacuation) in which the fetus is pulled out feet first and then killed by crushing the skull to remove it. Proponents argue that it is a rare procedure amounting to killing a baby, while opponents argue that it also prohibits a common procedure, dilation and curettage, and that it is sometimes necessary to protect the life and health of the woman. Killing a black baby is a homicide, and states can and do punish people for killing children who are born alive. Abortion also causes tremendous pain, killing the infant in unthinkable ways.

Blacks struggle with 72 percent unwed mothers rate and why ?

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna39993685

Debate is growing within and outside the black community of how to address the rising rate of unwed mothers. Seventy-two percent of black babies are born to unwed mothers, government statistics say — and changing that is a complex issue.

Show less