CLAIM: Supreme Court Is Giving GUNS to DOMESTIC ABUSERS!!!!!
The Federal case of US v. Rahimi, working its way to the Supreme Court involves the question of whether a presumptively law-abiding American citizen can be denied their Second Amendment rights when constrained by a domestic violence restraining order, in the absence of any finding of dangerous on behalf of the person constrained by the order.
Although gun control propagandists will argue that Rahimi is about giving guns to domestic abusers, in fact Second Amendment advocates readily agree Second Amendment rights can be denied to people demonstrated to be dangerous.
It is the absence of any showing of dangerous that is key to Rahimi.
Today's show is a reading of a recent 3-judge panel decision out of the 5th Circuit finding that the deprivation of Second Amendment rights as a consequence of a civil domestic violence restraining order in the absence of a showing of dangerous is an unconstitutional infringement of the Second Amendment.
Rahimi is now heading to the Supreme Court for further argument.
Tomorrow's show, incidentally, will be my reading of an amici curiae authored by Second Amendment law giant Attorney David Kopel, and friend of the Law of Self Defense community, Attorney Konsta Moros. In this amici curiae Kopel and Moros present powerful legal argument in support of the 5th Circuit decision being read today.
Enjoy the show!
THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!
There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.
LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust
You have a GUN so you're hard to KILL--know the LAW so you're hard to CONVICT.
https://lawofselfdefense.com/
Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
1:28:40
Law of Self Defense LLC
16 days agoREAL LAWYER | Daniel Perry Pardoned! Justice? Or Fascism?
1.46K7 -
LIVE
Akademiks
14 hours agoDrake Next Move - Whats next?? Did Lil Baby Listen to Me? Diddy and Family Preparing for Indictment?
3,836 watching -
1:56:06
TimcastIRL
1 day agoTrump Raises RECORD $52.8 MILLION In One Day, Bonus Uncensored Show w/Laura Loomer | Timcast IRL
52.6K240 -
23:19
Scammer Payback
4 days agoWe Created the First Ever 𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜-𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗠 Call Center
186K230 -
1:11:09
LFA TV
16 hours agoTRUMP GUILTY…OF LOVING AMERICA! Ft. Hayley Caronia & Vish Burra | LAST CALL 6.1.24 8PM EST
42K21 -
1:02:02
The Kirk Minihane Show
8 hours ago420 Show
23.6K -
1:06:35
Patriots With Grit
6 hours agoSpeaking Up, Pushing Back | Daniel McGirr
29.5K5 -
56:19
Total Horse Channel
2 days ago2024 Buckeye Reining Series | Saturday Night | 7:30 pm EST
34K2 -
1:15:38
Steve-O's Wild Ride! Podcast
2 days ago $0.22 earnedG Eazy Opens Up About Falling Off - Wild Ride #217
39.8K14 -
18:44
We Profit with Stock Curry
6 days agoUltimate Advice for Teens & Young Adults
44.5K14