Supreme Court rules women don't exist (Canada)
2 months ago
739
• Recent Supreme Court decision in Canada regarding a sexual assault case sparks controversy.
• Court ruled against using the term "woman" for the alleged victim, suggesting "person with a lady's part" instead.
• Author criticizes leftist ideology influencing the decision, accusing it of denying biological differences between men and women.
• Frustration expressed over erosion of traditional gender identities and implications for women's rights movements.
• Gender-neutral language emphasized in legal proceedings and media discourse.
• Overall, the text presents a critical perspective on the impact of progressive ideologies on gender identity and societal norms.
Loading comments...
-
7:39
The Road to Freedom
25 days ago $0.13 earnedErasing Women & the Policy Driven Dystopia Called Canada
799 -
13:41
Isabel Brown
1 month ago $0.18 earnedWomen's Rights 🚫!?
1.09K8 -
3:34
ShatteredThought
2 months agoSupreme Court of Canada says Female Assault Victim is problematic, should be called Person with V🙄🤐🤡
47 -
23:20
BetterBachelor
1 month agoSupreme Court votes 9-0 on case on women, accidentally gives men a huge win.
14.4K63 -
27:28
Heretical Sedition
1 month agoThe Gender Law Debate in #Sweden & Marxist Gender Non-Conformism
37 -
8:56
WorkingManPerspective
1 month agoSupreme Court ruling on gender-affirming care
53 -
4:25
Rebel News
2 months ago $3.63 earnedCalgary writer speaks out on perils of gender ideology
10.1K23 -
2:13
Newsy
4 years agoHow Judges Consider Gender In Sentencing
14 -
11:05
The Cash Loren Show
29 days agoVICTORY for Women: Middle School Girls Vs Transgender Judge Reverses The BANN On Women
14 -
0:05
Kingoftheaffiliates
1 month agoGender equality and women’s rights
14