Juries and civil cases against the police - YOUR RIGHT to have a Jury and why!
It is a little-known fact that some actions against the police compensation claims (specifically cases involving claims for false imprisonment and/or malicious prosecution) can be decided by a jury.
The right to trial by jury in such cases was preserved for such claims against the police after it was abolished for most other civil actions in 1933.
Putting such a case before a Jury does not, however, come without complications.
Judicial guidance in police claims
By s.69 of the Supreme Courts Act 1981, a party wishing to claim the right to have their case heard before a jury has to apply for it within 28 days of the service of the Defence.
Should either party fail to make such an application, the case must be tried by a Judge alone unless the Court in its discretion orders trial by jury. As May LJ noted in Times Newspapers Ltd v Armstrong (2006),
‘the discretion is now rarely exercised, reflecting contemporary practice. Contemporary practice has an eye, among other things, to proportionality; the greater predictability of the decision of a professional Judge; and the fact that a Judge gives decisions.’
Reasons to keep jury trials in police abuse claims
Given ‘contemporary practice’, why then encourage (as I routinely do) a victim of police abuse to elect jury trial?
Because an individual’s belief in the rule of law is shaken when they are a victim of wrongdoing by the police.
The police are agents of the state. The courts can be considered the same way, and I often hear scepticism of judicial independence and the need to avoid the ‘involuntary bias towards those of their own rank and dignity’ (Frank Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd (2011)).
Some might query whether my faith and confidence in jury trials in cases involving police abuse has been knocked.
https://iaingould.co.uk/2022/09/02/the-power-of-a-jury/
https://iaingould.co.uk/2013/06/13/why-have-jury-trials-in-actions-against-the-police/
-
1:46
WFTX
2 years agoLaw enforcement experts weighs in on jury decision
11 -
3:03
WMAR
1 year agoPlea deals resulting in officers' assault draws judicial transparency back into question
1 -
1:19
themarkgshow
4 months agoCorruption and Bias - Is Justice Being Served in the Court Case?
36 -
20:36
Legal Vices
10 months agoFL v. YNW MELLY Murder Trial: MISTRIAL!!!
540 -
1:03
ConservativeTribune
6 years agoEvidence Suggests Jury Was Right To Acquit Arizona Cop
3 -
38:35
Freedom Has A Voice - Dylan Oakley
3 months agoReflections on the Landmark Civil Trial Actioned by QPS and QAS workers - 10 June 2022
125 -
6:49
Dinesh D'Souza
3 years agoThere's a Crisis in Our Jury System | The OJ Simpson and Derek Chauvin Cases Prove It
3.95K70 -
52:58
Legale§e
4 months agoHow The Administrative State Is Disputing Your Right To A Jury Trial
25 -
0:15
AttorneysMedia
2 years ago $0.01 earnedWhat Happens If We Lose At The Trial Of My Personal Injury Case ?
7 -
12:29
ArmedAttorneys
2 months ago $0.01 earnedJudged by 12: Why Self-Defense Cases go to Trial
1964