WA Police officer successful injunction against employer over Vaccine
Interview outside court with Augusto Zimmermann https://g.co/kgs/iCvJQQ
and Judy Wilyman https://g.co/kgs/LUUSpf
re successful court injunction against WA police commission mandate injection program of police.
there are various critical facts shared in this interview in particular
0.50 inalienable right to freedom and choice
1.40 forcing the jab / coercion
2.30 Chief Health officer Violating right to bodily autonomy
3.00 min summary of court case injunction
4.10 how would this case effect the community
6.40 The precautionary Principle - relevant to emergency laws - false info by the states
7.30 false info by states case to - cant call it Vaccine program because it fails the definition "Vaccine eliminates/stops not reduce" ... only in market for 1 yr - requires 10 yrs to validate the adverse effects
9.10 official register of deaths .. its only 1% of correct data - will take up to 10 yrs to complete the official data
10.30 precautionary Principle includes not using mandates due to unknown
11.48 border chaos is by law in disregard to the Constitution
12.32 Coercion breach, Doctors are obliged to promote Govt policy not patient health - all directives is opposite to prevent and create health.
14.10 McGowan is political not health
15.00 once powers given its very difficult to retract and become permanent
15.40 NSW different tact ... is it the premier or their timeline and Medical Apartheid
17.00 political issue - complying is totalitarian regime
17.40 genetic modification tech requires 10 yrs to determine causality
18.30 Privacy issue - Jab is excuse for invasion of privacy - - > HISTORY SHOWS Every dictatorship starts with excuse of emergency powers
20.10 today advocating freedom is sited as a radical. Leaders constantly changing rules; more jabs coming and forcing forward more fears - now its jab 5yrs which is proven to have almost nil exposure .. why ??
21:30 why jab people at no risk - raised in the court case
22.30 Health Minister in collision as they know jab of children not required
22.50 WA govt new industrial law - huge liability on employers Incl manslaughter - where employees that gets harmed in workplace - forcing worker to get jabbed means employer can be charged with manslaughter which is far worse then the fines for not forcing.
25.10 UK govt official decision not to jab children due to high risks
26.00 industrial laws criminality on employers for consequences to employees forced to be jabbed
27.10 WHO confirms injection of children is high risk and genetics means each person is different reaction, it can cause disease in the future
credit source live camcast TV https://www.facebook.com/live.camcast/videos/2176330339191379
-
LIVE
Matt Kohrs
12 hours agoGameStop Pushes Higher, Nvidia Smashes Records & Breaking News || The MK Show
2,112 watching -
LIVE
Major League Fishing
1 day agoLIVE Bass Pro Tour: Stage 5, Day 1
764 watching -
1:42:29
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
4 hours agoThe Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #931
11.6K6 -
12:38
History With Kayleigh
1 day ago $0.08 earnedWhy Are Most Men From Ancient Egyptian Depicted Bald?
9.36K69 -
20:32
Popcorn In Bed
13 hours agoTHE MATRIX (1999) | FIRST TIME WATCHING | MOVIE REACTION
15.3K35 -
14:23
Freakin' Reviews
19 hours agoIs This Toaster Worth $100?
22.5K19 -
6:18
ThinkStory
1 day agoDARK MATTER Episode 6 Breakdown, Theories & Details You Missed!
24.2K3 -
14:00
JoBlo Horror Originals
1 day ago3 From Hell: A Lazy Revival Of The Firefly Clan
24.7K6 -
8:01
LenaPetrova
15 hours ago🚨BRICS IS EXPANDING: Turkey, a NATO Member, Announces Plans to Join BRICS Bloc in 2024
16.8K6 -
6:44
Chris Jericho
20 hours agoTalk Is Jericho Highlight: Gypsy Rose & Ryan - The Exclusive Interview Before The Split
23K4