private stash

The people are being conscripted and governed as militia

Going over the outline/blueprint

Discussion in regards to whom we contact to complete delivery and adopt the PERSON as our own in exercise of faith and right to bear arms

Discussion on Cy Pres and expressing the NAME as Charitable Trust in harmony with both man and God.

we had company drop by: The gang from http://Constitutionallawgroup.us and Kurt from https://kirkslawcorner.com/ joined in tonight's show. enjoy

DOCS: none that are new; discussion of docs already distributed Conversation over court case matters; some other philosophical discussions in regards to Rule 19 and Lot's Wife

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/03112022.zip (chrome users may have to copy/paste link into new tab/window) More Rule 19 discussion; tying biblical principles and scripture to the Birth Certificate and what has really been created for us; with a dash from an Australian perspective to mix things up a bit

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/03032022.zip Also recommend people view: https://rumble.com/veke0p-law-of-boris-part-7-of-8.html Success Story using equitable right of set-off in conjunction with the Lord's Prayer; subrogation; some testimonies; Rule 19 discussion Unless proof of claim the United States paid the State of Birth to register and or record man/people born for conversion into a governmentally recognized “surety,” “franchise,” “tax payer,” or a “statutory or juristic Person” by operation of law as the [YOUR NAME], et al., name is derived from the [Your Full Name] name affixed to a certificate of live birth; as the States receive allotments for each live birth each State bore from appropriations provided by Congress with Title V of THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT OF 1935; and as Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 limits jurisdiction of Congress; Or proof of claim for the alternative agreement to rebut United States vs PeWee Coal, 1951 (341 U.S. 114, 71 S.Ct. 670, 95 L.Ed. 809) because “whatever might have been one’s losses had one been left free to exercise one’s own “business judgment”, the crucial fact is that the State of Birth and United States choose to intervene in one's "business judgment" by taking possession of the live birth event and operating control by registering such event to secure the Social Security Funds and other grants offered by the United States. By doing so, the State of Birth and United States became the proprietor and, in the absence of contrary arrangements, are entitled to the benefits and subject to the liabilities which that status involves;” Else, one is the Act of God and Force Majeure behind the event registered and recorded in this world of insurance and contract

http://www.lawofboris.com/files/CR(TM)_files.zip The easiest way to create a binding contract

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/12112021.zip another Q&A session

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/12082021.zip Second Q&A because i screwed up the first scheduled Q&A session. i am surprised people still listen with a scatterbrained dude such as myself at the helm.

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/12072021.zip just some Q&A

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/11292021.zip (if link does not work, copy and paste into another browser) First look at the IPIED(TM) in its entirety; simpler than you think.

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/11032021.zip going over another dude's success story with review of what he did in helping his mom. This dude gets it. You don't have to get it perfect; just have to get it.

example of petition for removal of nonage with maxims of law: (qui non obstat quod obstare potest facere videtur) he who does not prevent what he can, seems to commit the thing; (Longa possessio est pacis jus) long possession is the law of peace; (Longa possessio parit jus possidendi, et tollit actionem vero domino) long possession produces the right of possession, and takes away from the true owner his action; (Quae praeter consuetudinem et morem majorum fiunt, neque placent, necque recta videntur) what is done contrary to the custom of our ancestors, neither pleases nor appears right; (nemo ex alterius facto praegravari debet) no man ought to be burdened in consequence of another's act; (Quando duo juro concurrunt in und person, aequum est ac si essent in diversis) when two rights concur in one person, it is the same as if they were in two separate persons; (Disparata non debent jungi) unequal things ought not to be joined; (Executio juris non habet noxa) the execution of the law causes no harm;

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/10272021.zip (copy and paste into separate browser if link not working) equitable right of subrogation to remove the nonage formulation of contracts between man and man; "i, a man: name;" to "segregate" the live man from person to "enforce" contract if you do not come to the party with a "contract/agreement," you will be "governed" with a "court created contract" (ORDER) law common to i = the law of the contract you created Law of Boris is the "law common with the man called Boris" .. "proof of claim, else u so fuct : either one has right, or one is doing wrong which is trespass goal to fuse "legal" with "common" so we do not have to talk like lawyers and attorneys all the fucking time; intent trumps words to put pen to paper is to be at war; should go to neighbor first, like men do; children bitch and complain.

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/10212021.zip (copy and paste into separate browser if not working) Baby Act = plea of infancy + rule 19 to remove the conservatorship everyone is "Brittney Spears" remove the INFANCY, remove the CONSERVATORSHIP; remove the CONSERVATORSHIP, remove one from being GUARDIAN (ie: elective franchise, political franchise, suffrage); remove the GUARDIANSHIP, free the man

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/10142021.zip (copy/paste into separate browser if not working) bring the claim to the party; else presumption of "wrong doer" exists Maxims of law = foundation = biblical principles discussion regarding "mandates" and "contract of benevolence" = one sided contract by a bailee “Minimum contacts” = Due process requires that non-resident defendants have “minimum contacts” with the forum, such that the exercise of personal jurisdiction does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” Int’l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945). The defendant’s contacts with the forum state must have a basis in some act by which the defendant “purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.” Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958).

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/09282021.zip (copy and paste link if it does not open) https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=7gk-AAAAIAAJ&pg=GBS.PP1&hl=en pp: 11-37, Assumpsit pp: 50-68, Trespass talk in regards to enforcement.

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/09062021.zip (copy and paste link if it does not open) Using Constitution and maxims to address mask/vaccine mandates employing grand jury for enforcement

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/08172021.zip Patriot Act Section 802 in conjunction with 63 Am. Jur. Public Servants, §273 (1997, 2011) ... more weaving of everything together all is done via Constitution, Law of Nations and Biblical principles

Presentment of the BC in Court setting: BC is evidence the State took private property for public purpose. Therefore, "just compensation" would be apply one's interest in that event to the current obligation for set-off with appointment of Judge as Trustee.

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/07282021.zip Territorial Jurisdiction challenge

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/07282021.zip Abstract of Trust with Exercise of Power of Appointment

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/07152021.zip Discussion on territorial jurisdiction and possible use of FOIA requests. Analysis of audio with DC Lawyer recorded a few years ago. Breakdown of the thought process with advice and frank discussion. This is a must listen for foundation.