EdwardKingSolomon

In this video we shall discuss the necessary set theory definitions and functions required to analyze an election. These definitions and functions are: Set, Union, Intersection, Difference, Symmetric Difference, Disjoint, Complementary, Subset, Superset, Cardinality and Ordering. In Sections II and III I demonstrate how to implement and code these functions to rapidly sort through a dataset of precinct level voting data by their County Names and Congressional Districts. Link to Text of Chapter I: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12jRM9fURavrGZRp9dSzqJH-ao5G1muQ09HVHwaVJKhQ/edit?usp=sharing

Patriot Tabulation Database Project. Please help data analysts by entering the precinct level data of the county you reside in. Thanks! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uhGbRgNnHKt4kjFygXiRmwh0iUBxD7wXV-7ObSPq5Og/edit?usp=sharing

This paper will demonstrate how to measure the difference between a fair and an unfair election, where an unfair election is an election where the result is predetermined algorithmically. At the very core of this article lay the assumption of Causality, that the Effect cannot precede the Cause; likewise, the Aggregate Percentage of a Candidate cannot precede the Election Day and the Mail-in Percentages of that candidate. In a fair election, the aggregate cannot be known until after all ballots are cast; in an election that is unfair, where the aggregate was predetermined, the aggregate becomes the cause and the Mail-in Vote (and/or the Election Day Vote) becomes the effect...and the laws of mathematics allow us to readily discern between which was the cause...and which was the effect. To Paraphrase Immanuel Kant: “The causation is the thing without which, is a condition of possibility of a thing, and so it is satisfied in the thing.” The aggregate is not a condition of possibility for the Mail-in votes number. The Aggregate is a Concept that relates two things. People vote by mail and people vote at the polls on election day, but no one, to my knowledge, has voted by aggregate. The content of this article transcends mere elections, these principles can be applied to detect financial fraud on Wall Street, reveal bogus claims from engineered studies and even to expose an entire body of manufactured evidence to support a scientific hypothesis.

Short Video; General Overview of Atlanta

Supplementary Video for Atlanta Readme

UPDATE: Use 6/pi^2 in the formula instead of 3/pi^2. This makes the results in GA and PA even worse, it does however normalize MI's first five gcd's. Natural Distributions of GCD's for a Candidate (numerator) divided by the Total Number of Votes (denominator) in a Precinct: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/1jguymmnrk In this spreadsheet go to "GCD4" sheet. Cell ALN2 is where you input the desired GCD; cell ALN 1002 is where you see the count and the density of that GCD (distribution) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fixRSSlb-AF-jfqxuo7RKnBoLgazjjsv/view?usp=sharing No matter how many phony PHD's from Princeton some guy has, he can't refute that Democrats violated the Laws of Geometry and Euler's Theorem concerning Irreducible Fractions (Euler proved this in the 18th Century). https://thedonald.win/p/11RhKCP2IK/un... https://thedonald.win/p/11RhKCP2IK/unleashing-the-kraken--god-bless/ GA, MI, PA spreadsheets (link is safe ignore warning): https://gofile.io/d/faVHlQ Other crash course links on the impossibility of a consecutive train of ratio transfers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imU52cjeGbA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5FShKVjRdk&t=1550s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1i6fdCG6gs&t=189s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1i6fdCG6gs&t=189s

This is the preliminary video, I'll be making an even more detailed video later. Sick of disinfo agents lying about the chances of these things happening. --------------------------------- General formula for a/b, a is the recorded numerator and b is the recorded denominator. u = margin (%) for numerator, w = margin (%) for denominator. (3(((100+w)/100)b)^2)/(pi^2) times (2u/100) --------------------------------- In this video you'll see that the chance of a particular precinct picking up the ratio 1:14 (trump to total), with a denominator of 406, was a 1/6000 chance. The chance of a 1:14 ratio being transferred from Nov 4th to Nov11th, between multiple sets of distinct precincts is like taking a coin with a 1/6000 chance of being heads, and getting heads everytime. https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yca... Sheet BK2: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/... Approximate 3n^2/(pi^2) https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i... Exact (Sum of Euler Totient Function): https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/i=... Supporting documents: https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_to_I... https://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%2... https://gofile.io/d/yQQP5g https://www.scribd.com/document/41166... ------------------------ When multiple fake news sources started posting scatter plot collisions of percentages (instead of discrete integer ratios), and claim that my work is negated by the fact that two non parallel lines eventually intersect (over a real-number continuum), I'm forced to make a video showing the actual chance of a discrete integer ratio collision. The integers (and rational numbers) are not a continuum like the set of all real numbers on the x-y plane. Literally fake news said "because two non parallel lines intersect, this is debunked," meanwhile continuous lines only exist in the domain of ALL real numbers, not the subset of rational numbers. --------------------------- Huge Update: Chance is reduced from 1/60,000 (for that example) to 1/43,000 (still a terrible chance lol), and after the 10% numerator filter we go from 1/6000 to 1/4300 (still wouldn't put my money on that chance!). I am making a new video now. If a hostile group of mathematicians came across the transposition problem first they would have trashed me on fake news, and purposely not solved the remainder of the formula. The same geometric principles in the video apply, but they had to be spliced. Long story short, using an easy number of 1000: If a precinct got 1000 votes, and we put the margin at 10% (allowing between 900 and 1100 votes), an irreducible fraction, such as 1/430, cannot transpose into that margin, because it's next occurrence is at 2/860, and then 3/1290. This creates an alternating harmonic sum of ratios that can transpose into the margin of 900 to 1100, and those that can't. The only two ranges that are guaranteed to transpose are the margins themselves (from 900-1100), this is called the "Identity Range", and the numbers 1-200 (the difference of 1100 and 900), this is called the Guaranteed Range (for any number between 1 and 200, there must exist at least multiple of that number between 900 and 1100). I had two of my former math professors on the phone into the night fixing this with me. I'm pretty sure I ruined their Thanksgivings, but they more than happy to help knowing the stakes. Formula is in image and wolfram links, the variable "c" is the reciprocal of the original "w" variable, which was the % margin for the denominator. So if you want a % margin of 3% for the denominator, then c = (100/3); the variable "b" remains the recorded denominator on the precinct's timestamp. Specific to the video example: https://ibb.co/qBDqZqc https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28Sum%28%281%2Fk%29%283%2Fpi%5E2%29%28b%2B%28b%2Fc%29%29%5E2%29-%281%2Fk%29%283%2Fpi%5E2%29%28b-%28b%2Fc%29%29%5E2%29%2C+k+%3D1+to+k%3D%28c-1%29%2F2%2C+c+%3D10%2C+b+%3D400 General formula: https://ibb.co/fnhnpM0 https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28Sum%28%281%2Fk%29%283%2Fpi%5E2%29%28b%2B%28b%2Fc%29%29%5E2%29-%281%2Fk%29%283%2Fpi%5E2%29%28b-%28b%2Fc%29%29%5E2%29%2C+k+%3D1+to+k%3D%28c-1%29%2F2 Plain text formula (wolfram): sum_(k=1)^((c - 1)/2)((3 (b/c + b)^2)/(π^2 k) - (3 (b - b/c)^2)/(π^2 k)) = (12 b^2 (polygamma(0, (c + 1)/2) + gamma ))/(π^2 c) After you execute that part of the formula add (3/pi^2)((2x/c))^2, which is the Guaranteed Range. The Identity Range is included in the gamma sum for index k =1. After that you can apply the standard numerator filter (2u)/100, where u = the margin % for the numerator.

The audio and video quality stabilizes about 5-6 minutes in. I had a lot of processes running simultaneously to simulate Michigan, while recording the full screen. Completed Paper of the Michigan Analysis: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UxxiGqcozWIE6w877yTByQPKO3QDU07HcxBc-Eglzso/edit?usp=sharing Starting Files and Spreadsheets (link is safe, ignore warning) https://gofile.io/d/SoyqIA Link to the Polynomial Rotator: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/fx7puzgxdg Link to the Polynomial used in Starcraft simulation: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/qkt2io4fyn Link to the Starcraft II maps files: https://gofile.io/d/swmDl4 You can download LibreOffice and Starcraft 2 for free to view and use these files. Link to first video with spreadsheets (video was cropped!) https://youtu.be/g_-I6ae-aJw https://rumble.com/vc7wxd-smoking-gun-3-behold-the-wheel-of-michigan.-net-total-over-280000-votes-sto.html https://www.bitchute.com/video/0OnAWJSEZGWa/ Link to Oakland's Residual Plot Generator: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/5fsxk8v52o Oakland County: Trump suffers a net loss of 112,044 votes. Kent County: Trump suffers a net loss of 44,053 vote (in agreement with Dr. Shiva). Kalamazoo County: Trump suffers a net loss of 15,910 votes. Ingham County: Unknown, since no prior timestamp contains a higher percentage for Trump than the first timestamp. Access to the tabulation tapes will be required: Saginaw County: 10,286 votes minimum. Several precincts in Saginaw have no timestamp prior to their first timestamp with a higher percentage for Trump. Access to the tabulation tapes will be required. Macomb County: Trump suffers a net loss of 70,944 votes. The City of Detroit: Trump suffers a minimal loss of 225 votes; however, the distribution of Detroit’s ratios show that a different algorithm was used, using Random Number Generation to generate Trump’s initial starting state. All remaining counties in the analysis: Trump suffers a net loss of 34,518 votes.

Completed Paper of the Michigan Analysis: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UxxiGqcozWIE6w877yTByQPKO3QDU07HcxBc-Eglzso/edit?usp=sharing Starting Files and Spreadsheets (link is safe, ignore warning) https://gofile.io/d/SoyqIA Link to the Polynomial Rotator: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/fx7puzgxdg Link to Oakland's Residual Plot Generator: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/5fsxk8v52o Oakland County: Trump suffers a net loss of 112,044 votes. Kent County: Trump suffers a net loss of 44,053 vote (in agreement with Dr. Shiva). Kalamazoo County: Trump suffers a net loss of 15,910 votes. Ingham County: Unknown, since no prior timestamp contains a higher percentage for Trump than the first timestamp. Access to the tabulation tapes will be required: Saginaw County: 10,286 votes minimum. Several precincts in Saginaw have no timestamp prior to their first timestamp with a higher percentage for Trump. Access to the tabulation tapes will be required. Macomb County: Trump suffers a net loss of 70,944 votes. The City of Detroit: Trump suffers a minimal loss of 225 votes; however, the distribution of Detroit’s ratios show that a different algorithm was used, using Random Number Generation to generate Trump’s initial starting state. All remaining counties in the analysis: Trump suffers a net loss of 34,518 votes.

Many people said I needed to explain or map my theory better, so I one upped them, I made a live simulation of fraction magic. Second follow up video (nerdy): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1i6fdCG6gs Link below to PA analysis: "I mapped all of the ratio transfers that occur within ONE TIMESTAMP of each other, no less than 115,343 votes were flipped to 89% Biden. Most of these ratios are chained for the entire week, transferring to a new set of precincts within a single timestamp (within one global update). For this experiment I kept the timestamp difference at 1, so no false positive would emerge (the logic board on the "mother edited" file is so strict, I most likely negated dozens of actual positives). All documents included in the go.file link. You can match the "Mother Number" entries from the condensed googlesheet version to the "Mother Sheet" file. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Feu70w7RDoMR1w9rSzq-Yn7hfmQEmv3WfzdnisGNvsk/edit?usp=sharing https://gofile.io/d/X262uw Found a major red flag in one of the ratio transfer timelines, the tabulations actually increase in Precinct 52-05 three times by 14:13:1 in a four hour span. https://ibb.co/h1k9v52 Flag is in "BK2 Fire" sheet in googlesheet link.

*This is a very boring video, this video is for educating other data analysts." In the event something happens to me, I'm creating two videos, Part 1 shows you how to import large CSV files into a database, how to partition the database via criterion queries, how to export the queries to a spreadsheet, and how to setup the Fathersheet and the Mothersheets for Ratio Transfer Analysis. Part 2 (currently making the video as I speak), shows you how to set up the logic boards from the parent Mothersheet to compile your evidence and cross reference the Mothersheet to produce the information needed to save our Republic. St. Francis Of Assisi — 'All the darkness in the world cannot extinguish the light of a single candle.' 4:20 to 15:45 Importing CSV, query, export to spreadsheet. 16:00 to 133:30 Creating the Fathersheet (covers the worst case scenarios for reversing pivot tables and real number Date/Time splits). 134:00 to End, creating your Mothersheet.

I present to you the Great Wheel of Georgia. Here's a small spreadsheet file so you can see for yourself. Second file does it with 2231 ceiling. First set of columns is the actual reported total votes/trump votes and their ratios from the last report of the hijacked precincts before they were released from the systems contro. Second set of columns is those same ratios using the same uniform total in for each precinct, proving it started from an equally weighted position since it produced the same split Trump to Total overall. Third set of columns is randomly generated precinct totals, to show you that it fails to produce the same Trump to Total split, thus it can only work for those reported totals or using the same uniform number. https://gofile.io/d/XyFDxo https://gofile.io/d/h4n8sm

Udpate, Layman's Version: https://rumble.com/vbmho1-laymans-explanation-of-the-wheel..html Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden in seized precincts in Atlanta. Affidavits signed. Watch the video. You will know. Summary: Final hijacked state is 287,424 total votes. 242,434 Biden, 42,109 Trump, Net gain 200,325 Final hijacked state is 14.65% Trump. All hijacked precincts after release report: 93,327 Trump out of 504,700. That is 18.49%, if we subtract the hijacked votes from the final aggregate state we get: 51,218 Trump out of 217,276, which is 23.57% Trump. That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template. The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct. 1: There are 371 unique precincts were this investigation. 2: There are 182 unique precincts involved in more than one ratio transfer. 3: There are 217 unique ratios were transferred. 4: That… A: Clayton County has only 2 precincts in multi ratio transfers. B: That Dekalb has 19 precincts in multi transfers. C: That Fulton boasts a staggering 157 precincts in multi ratio transfers. D: That Gwinnett has only 3 precincts in multi ratio transfers. 5: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 1041 total precincts 6: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 12681 unique overall ratios. 7: That 1.71% of the unique ratios are confirmed, post analysis and investiation, to be true positives, that no false positives were caught, nor any false negatives ignored. That of these 1.71% of the ratios, (217/12681), 246 precincts from Fulton are involved (66.30% of all precincts caught), and 71 precincts from DeKalb (19.13% of all precincts caught are involved. 8: That DeKalb has 190 precincts from the original database; that Fulton has 383 precincts on the from the original database. Furthermore that this means 37.3% of DeKalb’s precincts are involved, and likewise that 64.2% of Fulton’s precinctswere involved, and that this “Ratio Transfer” phenomenon does not even occur once in several of the counties in the Mothersheet (Rockdale and Newton), only twice in Henry County, and only 6 times in Cobb, which itself has over 100 precincts (thus less than 6% of its precincts have been flagged. Which is ten times as many less than Fulton’s by proportion)." 9: (Explained in video): That a distinct Wheel Number of 2231 was found, such that the virtual precincts were divided into 23 branches with 97 leaves; all wheel numbers above 2231 fail catastrophically (with polynomial increases of failure in the immediate range above 2231) until the trivial limit at the highest recorded denominator of 3784 (Fulton Precinct AP01A, November 5th, 21:16 AM). 10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct). Original Source, Spreadsheets, readmes and images used in video: https://gofile.io/d/PnJkyQ https://gofile.io/d/8lbok2 Use LibreOffice (free) to open the spreadsheets. https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/ Resource links: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/q0n4te5flx https://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/dvi/euler.pdf https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%280.81%29%280.015%29%282000%5E2%29%283%2F%28pi%29%5E2%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_of_unity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_totient_function# https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_to_Infinity_of_Summation_of_Euler_Phi_Function_over_Square Live Simulation of Ratio Transfer Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes&t=1060s How to calculate chance of transfer video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1i6fdCG6gs My love for God. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES2Ctj6MHjQ&t=22s The fate of nation is now in your hands. We cannot unsee what we have seen. We cannot unhear what we have heard. Bump it to the top. Watch it all. God Bless the United States, our Republic shall not fall this day. -------------------- Honorable mention to all pedes, and our data team (that provided the raw SCTYL and NYT data). Had I not found this website after the election, I never would have had the clues and reports available to me to start my search. The Grand Unification of Ratio Transfers and Fraction Magic has been made manifest. I salute all of you Patriots. Our nation has been saved. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v582kPp43Mg