PlenaryAuthority

#wgntv #chicago #dolton #supermayor

Summary and immediate reception In 1848, the author read the Negro Law of South Carolina to the State Agricultural Society of South Carolina, at their September semi-annual meeting in the Spartanburg Court House. The Society directed O’Neall to submit it to the governor, with a request that he would lay it before the legislature, at its approaching session in November of 1848. O'Neall also ordered it to be published for the information of the members. O'Neall summarized the 1740 South Carolina law when he stated: "A slave may, by the consent of his master, acquire and hold personal property. All, thus required, is regarded in law as that of the master." Across the South, state supreme courts supported the position of this law. O'Neall was the only one to express protest against the evidentiary Act of 1740, arguing for the propriety of receiving testimony from enslaved Africans-Americans (many of whom, by 1848, were Christians) under oath: "Negroes (slave or free) will feel the sanctions of an oath, with as much force as any of the ignorant classes of white people, in a Christian country." On December 18, 1848, Mr. W. G. DeSaussure, from the committee on the Judiciary agreed on the Message of the Governor recommending the purchase of 1200 copies of the Negro Law of South Carolina and sent report of this agreement to the House of Representatives for consideration. On December 8, 1858, Mr. Cannon offered a resolution for the Military Committee to inquire into the expediency of having the Negro Law of South Carolina re-published and bound in a separate volume for the purpose of distributing among the Militia Officers of the State and the Commissioners of Roads and Bridges of the State. Legacy The Negro Law of South Carolina was characterized by Howell Meadoes Henry as being: "An excellent summary of South Carolina slave law with court interpretations in narrative style, and with notes and comment and even recommendations as to desirable changes." It provides examples of opposition to and violation of literacy law by white evangelicals. Excerpt The following is an excerpt from the first page, of the first chapter, on "The Status of the Negro, his Rights and Disabilities", in the Negro Law of South Carolina: SECTION 1. The Act of 1740, sec. I, declares all negroes and Indians, (free Indians in amity with this Government, negroes, mulattoes and mestizoes, who now are free, excepted) to be slaves:— the offspring to follow the condition of the mother; and that such slaves are chattels personal. SEC. 2. Under this provision it has been uniformly held, that color is prima facie evidence, that the party bearing the color of a negro, mulatto or mestizo, is a slave; but the same prima facie result does not follow from the Indian color. SEC. 3. Indians, and the descendants of Indians are regarded as free Indians, in amity with this government, until the contrary be shown. In the second proviso of sec. 1, of the Act of 1740, it is declared that "every negro, Indian, mulatto and mestizo is a slave unless the contrary can be made to appear"—yet, in the same it is immediately thereafter provided—"the Indians in amity with this government, excepted, in which case the burden of proof shall lie on the defendant," that is, on the person claiming the Indian plaintiff to be a slave. This latter clause of the proviso is now regarded as furnishing the rule. The race of slave Indians or of Indians not in amity to this government, (The State,) is extinct, and hence the previous part of the proviso has no application. SEC. 4. The term negro is confined to slave Africans, (the ancient Berbers) and their descendants. It does not embrace the free inhabitants of Africa, such as the Egyptians, Moors, or the negro Asiatics, such as the Lascars. SEC. 5. Mulatto is the issue of the white and the negro. SEC. 6. When the mulatto ceases, and a party bearing some slight taint of the African blood, ranks as white, is a question for the solution of a Jury. Copyright disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act This video is for educational and entertainment purposes only. I do not own any of the clips or music used in this video. All rights belong to their respective owners. This video falls under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, which allows for limited use of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. S.M.I.B.

#sovereigncitizen <——-(oxymoron) #Americannational #Statenationals #Statemen #lawful #WethePeople #involuntary-servitude w/o Prejudice w/o Recourse. All Rights Reserved. The Supreme Court attempts to deflect such criticism by relying on history as justification for its decisions recognizing certain unenumerated rights. For example, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution prohibit the government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without “due process of law. Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Individuals receive no Fourth Amendment protection unless they can demonstrate that they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place that was searched or the property that was seized. The U.S. Supreme Court explained that what “a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection…. But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.” Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S. Ct. 507, 19 L. Ed. 2d 576 (1976). These influences threaten the very framework of our society. The U.S. Constitution The highest law in the United States is the U.S. Constitution. No state or federal law may contradict any provision in the Constitution. In a sense the federal Constitution is a collection of inviolable statutes. It can be altered only by amendment. Amendments pass after they are approved by two-thirds of both houses of Congress or after petition by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Amendments are then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by conventions in three-fourths of the states. Upon ratification, the amendment becomes part of the Constitution. Beneath the federal Constitution lies a vast body of other laws, including federal statutes, treaties, court decisions, agency regulations, and executive orders, and state constitutions, statutes, court decisions, agency regulations, and executive orders. Statutes and Treaties After the federal Constitution, the highest laws are written laws, or statutes, passed by elected federal lawmakers. States have their own constitution and statutes. Federal laws generally involve matters that concern the entire country. State laws generally do not reach beyond the borders of the state. Under Article VI, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, federal laws have supremacy over state and local laws. This means that when a state or local law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law prevails. He who spares the guilty, punishes the innocent. [Mark 15:6-15, Luke 23:17-25, John 18:38-40 Usury is odious in law. [Exodus 22:25, Leviticus 25:3637, Nehemiah 5:7,10, Proverbs 28:8, Ezekiel 18:8,13,17; 22:12] • Impossibility excuses the law • If you judge, understand. • Many men know many things, no one knows everything. • One is not present unless he understands. • Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent. • Consent makes the law: the terms of a contract, lawful in its purpose, constitute the law as between the parties. • To him consenting no injury is done. • He who consents cannot receive an injury. • Consent removes or obviates a mistake. Copyright disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act This video is for educational and entertainment purposes only. I do not own any of the clips or music used in this video. All rights belong to their respective owners. This video falls under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, which allows for limited use of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Non-Domestic/Non-Assumpsit 8 U.S.C § 1104(a)(1); 1408; 1503; 1182; 12 U.S.C § 531; 15 U.S.C § § 1; 2; 18a; 22 U.S.C § § 1741; 254d; 26 U.S.C § 6013(g); 28 U.S.C § 1746(1); 18 U.S.C § 1621(2); 2 FAM 232.1-1

U decided. Stay woke.

#Staywoke

😲

Senior Airman #RogerFortson's brutal death at the hands of a Florida Sheriff's Deputy. Please continue to pray for Roger's family during this grueling time following the loss of their beloved son. RIP

Senior Airman #RogerFortson's brutal death at the hands of a Florida Sheriff's Deputy. Please continue to pray for Roger's family during this grueling time following the loss of their beloved son. RIP

Let me know your thoughts on the gentleman speaking, if you see it happening today.

Original work copyright disclaimer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law.

Original work copyright disclaimer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law.

#newworldorder

Disclaimer Warning Graphic censor material. Watch at your own risk Original work copyright disclaimer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. All rights reserved.

04-10-2024

My prayers go out to the man and his family.

Only in Chicago