rmformond

As recently been alleged by George Stephanopoulos of ABC News that Donald Trump was found guilty of rape. Several in the legacy media and on social media have repeated this claim. We are going to investigate the binary fact. Was Donald Trump ever felt guilty of rape? The factors Donald Trump has never been on trial for rape. Prior to Donald Trump running for election, it was never indicted for anything. "Trump Defamation Suit: Setting the Record Straight on Stephanopoulos' Accusations In the midst of a heated legal back-and-forth, we bring you a fact-check on the allegations against George Stephanopoulos, and set the record straight on the matter of rape. In a recent development in the ongoing legal saga between former President Donald Trump and ABC, new light has been shed on the role of George Stephanopoulos and his interview with Republican Representative Nancy Mace. The Trump legal team has urged a Florida court to reject attempts by ABC to dismiss the defamation lawsuit, and we are here to separate the facts from the fiction. The Allegations: • It has been alleged by the Trump legal team that during an interview with South Carolina Representative Nancy Mace, George Stephanopoulos falsely claimed that a jury had found Trump liable for raping Elle columnist E. Jean Carroll. We are digging into this to provide you with the cold hard facts.

. In a show of unwavering dedication to religious freedom, the Knights of Columbus, a prominent Catholic fraternal organization, are taking a stand against the Biden administration, asserting their First Amendment rights. For decades, a solemn and poignant tradition has taken place at the Poplar Grove National Cemetery in Petersburg, Virginia. On Memorial Day, the Knights of Columbus gather to honor the fallen and pay their respects to deceased loved ones with a Catholic Mass. This year, however, the Biden administration has denied permission for this time-honored ritual to take place, sparking a legal battle that could have far-reaching implications for religious liberties in America. The Knights of Columbus argue that the administration's decision is a blatant violation of their First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and freedom of speech. They contend that prohibiting the celebration of a Catholic Mass on Memorial Day, a practice dating back to the Civil War, is an act of discrimination and a threat to the very values our nation holds dear. A Representative from the nights commented: "We are deeply disappointed by the Biden administration's refusal to allow us to uphold this long-standing tradition. This is not just about our right to practice our faith; it's about the fundamental principle of religious freedom enshrined in the First Amendment. We will not stand idly by while our rights are trampled upon, and we are prepared to fight for the liberties that generations before us have fought to secure." The determination of the Knights of Columbus to defend their rights is a powerful reminder of the importance of safeguarding our constitutional freedoms. Their legal challenge sends a clear message that Americans will not tolerate government overreach that infringes upon their fundamental rights. The Legal Experts says This case underscores the chilling effect that such decisions can have on our First Amendment rights. The Knights of Columbus are not just fighting for their own ability to practice their faith, but for the protection of religious liberties for all Americans. The outcome of this legal battle will undoubtedly shape the future of religious freedom in this country. As the nation watches this unfolding story, the Knights of Columbus stand as a beacon of courage and a reminder of the enduring strength of our constitutional rights.

: "Fact Check: Claim about Trump Abortion Bans." "Claim: '1 in 3 women of reproductive age live in a state with a Trump Abortion ban.' - Vice President Harris" : "Verdict: False." : "It is simply false and a blatant distortion of the truth to claim that '1 in 3 women of reproductive age live in a state with a Trump Abortion ban.' This statement is misleading and attempts to falsely associate state-level abortion restrictions with former President Donald J. Trump." : "First and foremost, former President Trump has never supported or advocated for legislation that bans abortion. He has consistently upheld the values of the Republican Party, which include a strong commitment to the sanctity of life and the protection of the unborn." : "During his presidency, Trump took a firm stance in support of the pro-life movement and was a strong advocate for the right to life. However, he respected the legal process and did not overstep his boundaries as President. The power to shape abortion policy primarily rests with the states, and any abortion bans or restrictions are a result of state-level legislation, not a so-called 'Trump Abortion Ban.'" : "It is important to clarify that the statement made by Vice President Harris refers to the number of women living in states with restrictive abortion laws, not a nationwide ban enacted by Trump. As of now, certain states have passed laws restricting abortion access, and these vary in their specifics and severity. However, to attribute these state-level decisions to Trump is grossly misleading." : "In conclusion, the claim made by Vice President Harris is a baseless attempt to politicize and mislead the American people on a sensitive and important issue. Donald Trump has never supported or signed into law any abortion ban, and it is disingenuous to suggest otherwise." Stay informed with facts."

"In this video, we fact-check the often-repeated claim by President Joe Biden and other Democrats that former President Donald Trump suggested injecting bleach as a treatment for COVID-19. This misleading accusation has been used as political ammunition against President Trump, but what are the facts? Join us as we break down the exact words of President Trump, analyze the context of his comments, and expose the false narrative perpetuated by the left-wing media. It's time to set the record straight and separate fact from fiction." This description utilizes keywords related to the content, such as "fact-check," "Donald Trump," "bleach injection," "COVID-19 treatment," "misleading claims," and "political ammunition." By including these keywords, the description will be optimized for search engines and is more likely to appear in suggestions or recommendations on platforms like Rumble and YouTube. Additionally, the description provides a clear and engaging overview of the video's content, inviting viewers to learn the truth behind the misleading claims made about President Trump's comments.

Limiting speech and enforcing so-called "safe spaces" is a slippery slope. It's a tactic often employed by those with authoritarian tendencies, who wish to control the narrative and suppress dissenting voices. You see, free speech is the bedrock of a democratic society. It allows for the open exchange of ideas, fosters intellectual curiosity, and enables the marketplace of ideas, where truth and wisdom can emerge. When we start restricting speech, we empower those in power to decide what is "acceptable" and "offensive," which can quickly lead to censorship and the suppression of viewpoints that challenge the status quo. The fascistic tendency to limit speech is a threat to the very foundation of a free society. It creates an environment where individuals are afraid to speak their minds, where self-censorship becomes the norm, and where diverse perspectives are silenced. In a true democracy, we must defend the right to speak freely, even when we disagree, and even when the ideas expressed may be uncomfortable or controversial. It is through this clash of ideas that we strengthen our understanding of the world and protect our freedom. Let us guard against those who would restrict our speech, for it is a short step from limiting words to limiting thoughts, and from there, it is but a small step to limiting our very freedom. Facts R Binary supports free speech, even when it becomes uncomfortable. We endorse no violence of any kind, but in order to remain free, our words cannot be restricted for fear of the authoritarians of the world declaring things to be out of bounds. Uncomfortable freedom is far more comfortable that any form of authoritarianism. Debunking shouting fire myth Shouting fire in crowded theater legal analysis Free speech myths in American politics Joe Biden free speech error Barack Obama shouting fire reference Protecting democracy through free speech Legal facts about shouting fire myth Democracy and the First Amendment Common free speech misconceptions

On a Facebook fact check, Reuters posts a false fact check filled with straw man arguments, ad hominem attacks and opinion disguised as fact. The article begins with a straw man attack and complete fallacy. It would appear Reuters does not want honest and open debate and is using their platform to shut down opposing views. This is not an honest endeavor. Binary fact checking is simple. Where other fact checks look into several different aspects of a situation, incident, speech, event, or so on, we take things item by item to see where the facts are. Taking a grand sweeping overview and forming an opinion is not checking the facts. Originally fact checkers were involved in journalism to do just this. They checked the facts before publishing because there were consequences for printing false stories. The safeguards were removed several years ago leading to spin replacing facts. Our intention is to return to actual fact checking. We check the facts so the viewer, or reader, can make form an opinion based upon the facts.

This is a fact check we did a while back on YouTube. We are in the process of bringing is much more content to rumble as possible. This fact check seems to be far more relevant now that it was when we did it originally. The Constitution does not protect gender identity. The fact is until recently no government documents recognized gender identity. It still only recognizes male and female. These are just the facts. Binary fact checking is simple. Where other fact checks look into several different aspects of a situation, incident, speech, event, or so on, we take things item by item to see where the facts are. Taking a grand sweeping overview and forming an opinion is not checking the facts. Originally fact checkers were involved in journalism to do just this. They checked the facts before publishing because there were consequences for printing false stories. The safeguards were removed several years ago leading to spin replacing facts. Our intention is to return to actual fact checking. We check the facts so the viewer, or reader, can make form an opinion based upon the facts.

Another binary fact check. If someone is going to call someone a liar, they should have their facts straight. Today we are dealing with the fact that Joe Biden did in fact state he wanted to redirect funds from police. This literally means defining according to the Cambridge Dictionary. Joe Biden did say he wanted to defund the police. Binary fact checking is simple. Where other fact checks look into several different aspects of a situation, incident, speech, event, or so on, we take things item by item to see where the facts are. Taking a grand sweeping overview and forming an opinion is not checking the facts. Originally fact checkers were involved in journalism to do just this. They checked the facts before publishing because there were consequences for printing false stories. The safeguards were removed several years ago leading to spin replacing facts. Our intention is to return to actual fact checking. We check the facts so the viewer, or reader, can make form an opinion based upon the facts.

In this binary fact check we explore Joe Biden's claim that not a single case of voter fraud was ever taken up by the courts based on evidence. In order for that to be true that would mean no court ever accepted any case of voter fraud and they were all therefore had to have been dismissed due to lack of evidence. This is a claim repeated by legacy media and on social media alike. Binary fact checking is simple. Where other fact checks look into several different aspects of a situation, incident, speech, event, or so on, we take things item by item to see where the facts are. Taking a grand sweeping overview and forming an opinion is not checking the facts. Originally fact checkers were involved in journalism to do just this. They checked the facts before publishing because there were consequences for printing false stories. The safeguards were removed several years ago leading to spin replacing facts. Our intention is to return to actual fact checking. We check the facts so the viewer, or reader, can make form an opinion based upon the facts.

Facebook is censoring comments about Joe Biden's law school performance. Joe Biden claimed to be at the top of his class. Joe Biden has made many claims about his performance in both law school and college. We will be fact checking this claim. Did Joe Biden graduated at the top of his class in law school? Binary fact checking is simple. Where other fact checks look into several different aspects of a situation, incident, speech, event, or so on, we take things item by item to see where the facts are. Taking a grand sweeping overview and forming an opinion is not checking the facts. Originally fact checkers were involved in journalism to do just this. They checked the facts before publishing because there were consequences for printing false stories. The safeguards were removed several years ago leading to spin replacing facts. Our intention is to return to actual fact checking. We check the facts so the viewer, or reader, can make form an opinion based upon the facts.

The claim Donald J Trump called White Supremacists "fine people" is being circulated again. We will look into the claim and give a binary conclusion of fact on the matter. Joe Biden claims this is why he ran for president in 2020. Binary fact checking is simple. Where other fact checks look into several different aspects of a situation, incident, speech, event, or so on, we take things item by item to see where the facts are. Taking a grand sweeping overview and forming an opinion is not checking the facts. Originally fact checkers were involved in journalism to do just this. They checked the facts before publishing because there were consequences for printing false stories. The safeguards were removed several years ago leading to spin replacing facts. Our intention is to return to actual fact checking. We check the facts so the viewer, or reader, can make form an opinion based upon the facts.

Facts R Binary fact checks the claim January 6th was an Insurrection. Joe Biden, the DNC, and leftist celebrities claim Donald Trump should be removed from ballots due to his involvement on January 6th. They claim it was an insurrection. Binary fact checking is simple. Where other fact checks look into several different aspects of a situation, incident, speech, event, or so on, we take things item by item to see where the facts are. Taking a grand sweeping overview and forming an opinion is not checking the facts. Originally fact checkers were involved in journalism to do just this. They checked the facts before publishing because there were consequences for printing false stories. The safeguards were removed several years ago leading to spin replacing facts. Our intention is to return to actual fact checking. We check the facts so the viewer, or reader, can make form an opinion based upon the facts.

This is a video we did a while back that was pulled from youtube. After several attempts to ask what was wrong with it we essentially got a strike because it went against "approved" information, despite all data and information coming from highly reputable educational and governmental sources. Facebook hit a video circulation social media with a fake fact check and claimed the doctor was not telling the truth about the efficacy of masks. The truth of the matter is the doctor was correct with the study he cited. In our research we found multiple studies that show the same results the doctor spoke of. The study the doctor was referring to was from the NIH. Here are some of those links. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/ https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-%20review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567 https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214 https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/put-covid-19-to-the-test https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-%20review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/