Biden Weakness Leads to Global Chaos
Catastrophic American Weakness: Russia Masses @ Ukraine as China Plans Taiwan Invasion
If Putin invaded Ukraine as China overwhelms Taiwan, would it explain why only 22% of Dems want Biden to run again? His unmitigated failures embarrass moderate Dems and ruin their chances for a dynasty. The single most trenchant characteristic of leftism is advocacy and implementation of catastrophic policies. Whether this disastrous habit derives from a lack of logic, historic ignorance or an instinct towards suicide is an open question. But the sadly predictable results of Biden's conjuring weakness have now metastasized into several colossally dangerous international crises. Russia has massed thousands of troops to invade Ukraine as China tweaks plans to conquer Taiwan. Does ol' Joe, who has the intellect and persona of a major league mascot, have any future in office?
Biden 22% Approval: Dems Scoff at Wisdom as Town Dunce Joe Trapped in National Outhouse
Given the massive number of avoidable American crises non-existent during Trump's reign, lets assume all is meant by design. So what do leftists gain from sabotaging the US? As Marxists, they must seek world socialism. But what happens if, along the way – a genuine 3rd world war emerges from their actions? Could this not destroy half the world on the way to global communism? The seem blissfully unconcerned. But why?
In fact, more than any other secular world movement, socialists believe in a foregone conclusion. Recall, this is not Christianity's Apocalypse, delivered by God. Instead, without any divine intervention, progressives have faith in a global outcome based upon Mystic Marxism. This means liberals remarkably believe the universe is driven by Marx's claims. Recall that Karl's Communist Manifesto was short on actual details. Instead, it offers the observation that the cosmos is self-motivated by socialist ideals of materialistic justice. Given Marx's messianic claims and prophet's moxie, what he taught is that if one assembles the right parts, these will animate towards utopia.
This fatalistic theory of human history is remarkable. First, despite Marx's demand religion be destroyed, his beliefs are transparently borrowed from the Bible. It's a world turning on justice, where the strong prey on the weak. A godless power, be it either the hope of the credulous or the inerrant impulse of the universe, will overcome usury and greed, and free the masses from the slavery of property. An international revolution will animate workers to arise and destroy the bondage of their masters.
In the essay, Marx and the Problem of Causation, is recounted Sidney Hook's devastating criticism of Marx's Historical Materialism, a critique of economic determinism. Hook explains how truly inadequate Marx's theory was in explaining cause and change. So, whatever Marx imagined about the world becoming socialist, it was not persuasive since it depended upon magic, aka Mystic Marxism.
But as none of Marx's mystic philosophy is true, should we just sit back and watch as his blind followers drive us all into penury, bondage or war? For those Christians out there, this cannot be an option. For the Just are meant to resist the agents of darkness, aka Babylon – the great humanistic conspiracy to fit all men for slavery. Fiat Lux!
1.68K
views
Dr Fauci, Mentally Ill Bureaucrat
Rape of Logic: Foolish Fauci Making Himself Science Actually Destroys It
Do elderly healthcare bureaucrats make salutary tyrants? Ancient virus magus Dr Fauci typically makes an ass of himself daily, but recently topped his previous egocentric claims by cleverly combining Scientism with megalomania. He stated: "They're really criticizing science because I represent science. That's dangerous." But, according to Victor Davis Hanson: “Fauci Is "Like A Monarch," Has Legislative, Judicial, And Executive Power All At Once.” In fact, Fauci himself has devolved into a politically correct virus becoming a self-enraptured guard dog for leftist power plays.
In other words, the diseased mind of Fauci, which collapsed in upon itself under a warm succubus of eternal self-love, thrives off power and acclaim, aggregating influence like a member of a Communist royal family. Kat Rosenfeld calls it: “Anthony Fauci’s dangerous narcissism,” stating: “Given that half the nation wants to canonize him as the Patron Saint of Public Health, it was probably inevitable that Fauci would be ultimately unable to resist buying into his own hype — but it was still remarkable to witness.”
But what is science? Merriam-Webster writes science is: “Knowledge about or study of the natural world based on facts learned through experiments and observation.” But Fauci drowned the virus with politics, not alcohol, wisdom or logic. Recall how many times he’s contradicted himself. Jim Jordan confirms.
Yet self-imagined martyr Fauci believes he is personally indistinguishable from science, and therefore cannot be criticized -- a completely irrational and nonsensical claim. Appearing on CBS' "Face the Nation," Fauci warned such attacks are dangerous because "if you damage science, you are doing something very detrimental to society." And this is America’s problem -- Fauci has become a dangerous demagogue blinded from reality, simply repping for the all-powerful state, always contradicting himself, never admitting mistakes.
But science cannot solve all problems of society, and it especially can’t be embodied in just one person. In general, Science is simply the use of the Scientific Method. But Fauci is a simple mouthpiece for Scientism -- essentially the claim that the only real knowledge in the world is empirical or measurable data, from a test tube, tape measure, or thermometer.
Yet, ‘scientist’-bureaucrat Fauci is beholden to the elites to create mask and shutdown mandates, ad hoc and off the cuff, indifferent as to whether they work. He’s essentially just an octogenarian song and dance man for the criminal covid elite. A fetid, festering parasite lodged in the alimentary canal of the American body politic.
Imagine, priceless immeasurables like love, mercy, God and justice do not exist, according to Scientism. Austin L. Hughes describes this in, The Folly of Scientism: “Central to scientism is the grabbing of nearly the entire territory of what were once considered questions that properly belong to philosophy. Scientism takes science to be not only better than philosophy at answering such questions, but the only means of answering them.”
As Massimo Pigliucci writes:
First off, what is scientism, exactly? Sometimes it pays to go back to the basics, in this case to the Merriam-Webster concise definition: “An exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities).” But surely this is a straw man. Who really fits that description? Plenty of prominent and influential people, as it turns out.
In a recent broadside launched by Libertarian Sen Rand Paul, he stated: “The absolute hubris of someone claiming THEY represent science. It’s astounding and alarming that a public health bureaucrat would even think to claim such a thing, especially one who has worked so hard to ignore the science of natural immunity.” Philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend asks:
“Is science the best type of knowledge we possess, or is it just the most influential? This way of putting the question has by now become obsolete. Science is not one thing, it is many; it is not closed, but open to new approaches. Objections to novelty and to alternatives come from particular groups with vested interests, not from science as a whole.” (See Scientism, the New Orthodoxy)
So Dr. Fauci beclowned himself with the towering fantasy of ne plus ultra becoming science personified. Last May, Fauci denied his agency funded Change of Function research, but in Oct, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) accused him of lying, demanding prosecution, Politico reported. Cruz stated on Hannity:
"I gotta admit, Sean, I was laughing … It is [his] delusions of grandeur that you cannot criticize him. And it was very striking. Dr. Fauci, I think, is the most dangerous bureaucrat in the history of the country ... he's been dishonest, he's been political, he's been partisan, and the American people know it.”
So, what can we do? In fact, we must each seek opportunities to challenge local, state and national bureaucrats to use science that is unbiased and logically sound. Fauci’s fear mongering and casually decaring shutdowns is going to destroy industries and turn America into a permanent socialist, welfare, command, economic -- tyranny. The time to act is now.
Nobel Prize winner & former Communist Doris Lessing observed: “Political correctness is the natural continuum from the party line. What we are seeing once again is a self-appointed group of vigilantes imposing their views on others. It is a heritage of communism, but they don't seem to see this.”
3.53K
views
Why Feds Probably Can't Charge Kyle Rittenhouse for Murder
Massive Win Brings Fury: Kyle Rittenhouse won a massive acquittal on all charges in a bitter lesson for all liberal demagogues. But in a seemingly endless litany of illogical decisions based on horrific leftist beliefs,the Dem House judiciary chairman called for a DOJ review of Kyle Rittenhouse Federal murder investigation. Such knee jerk decisions are why Biden is currently drowning in 36% approval ratings, and inevitably. Fuerther, with such a mistake and error riddled prosecution, only anti-America fanatics would want this ill-advised witch hunt to continue.
Double Jeopardy: Regarding a 2nd trial, most Americans are familiar with the term “double jeopardy,” from the Fifth Amendment. It states “no person shall…be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb…” So does this mean that Kyle can’t be charged again for the murders he was just acquitted of? Sadly, no. He can be recharged for a federal crime, like murder.
Dual Sovereignty: Unfortunately for Kyle, double jeopardy only covers one jurisdiction for the same crime. So while a state can’t pursue another prosecution against someone for the same offense after acquittal, the same is not true of federal jurisdiction. So, an individual may be prosecuted for the same offense in both state and federal courts because “dual sovereignty” means state & federal government each have their own jurisdiction over their own statutes and laws.
Yes, Feds can Charge Rittenhouse After WI State Lost a Jury Trial on the Same Events
Fed Powers: The fact is, the US Fed Govt has enormous powers of discretion for prosecution, should they choose to charge Kyle for federal homicide in US Dist. Ct. The reason why is the Feds have a different jurisdiction. So according to recently upheld law, the Feds have a right to launch a related prosecution.
What is a Federal Crime? In general, a crime is fed when it violates US fed legal codes or when the individual carries the criminal activity over multiple states. Such crimes represent a fed or national issue, like interstate contraband, fed tax fraud, mail fraud, etc. Many criminal acts -- bank robbery or kidnapping -- are crimes under both federal and state law and may be prosecuted in either jurisdiction.
Dual Sovereignty Cases: SCOTUS has held on a number of important cases ruling dual sovereignty allows the state and the federal government to pursue separate prosecutions for the same criminal offenses. So, the concept of double jeopardy is not as clear as it seems. Consider the following cases.
In Abbate v. United States (1959) SCOTUS ruled double jeopardy clause is inapplicable to a federal prosecution after a state prosecution for the same crime.
In Blueford v. Arkansas (2012) SCOTUS held Arkansas didn’t violate double jeopardy after the court dismissed his first murder trial.
In Gamble v. United States (2019), SCOTUS ruled dual sovereignty means defendants can be prosecuted by state & feds without violating the 5th Amendment double jeopardy;
Ten Fed Murder Charges: Murder prosecutions are generally done by states. But murder is a crime in violation of fed law, or taking place on a fed land or territory. The fed crime of murder is defined as the ‘unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought.’ Ten murder scenarios violate fed law:
18 U.S.C. § 351, 1751 – Murder of Elected or Appointed Officials
18 U.S.C. § 1114 – Murder of Federal Judge or Law Enforcement
18 U.S.C. § 115(b)(3) – Killing Family Member of Law Enforcement
18 U.S.C. § 1512 – Killing to Influence Outcome of a Court Case
18 U.S.C. § 36, 924(i) – Any Drug-Related Murders
18 U.S.C. § 2248, 2251 – Murder Related to Rape or Child Sex Crimes
18 U.S.C. § 1111 – Killing Committed During Bank Robbery
18 U.S.C. § 1958 – Murder for Hire
18 U.S.C. § 1716 – Murder by Mail
18 U.S.C. § 2280 – Murder Aboard a Ship
Frankly, it doesn’t seem like the Rittenhouse case has any of these elements.
Patriots Must Push Back: The fact Biden stated that Rittenhouse is a White Supremacist who should be convicted, without bothering to learn any details tells you a few things. First, Joe’s minders call the shots. Second, the left now believes they are immune from punishment. And the fact no person involved in these slayings was Black reveals how absurd Biden is, just parroting any points his minders print up for him. Third, victims of such scurrilous statements need to sue Joe and others for slander. It’s very important we contact our Reps and Senators to protest against such calumny, and generally resist the mindless race baiting which the left drowns our society in, day-in and day-out. If we don’t resist, we will never break the tyranny killing free speech until all our freedoms disappear.
2.66K
views
3
comments
New Bitter Struggle Drives Wedge Between Failing Kamala, Biden & li'l Pete Bootyegg
The inevitable struggle for supremacy has arisen between the chief losers of an already doomed presidency. Who will be the next Dem presidential candidate – is probably an irrelevant point, already. But in a mad dash to the bottom, Biden has somehow bested Kamala by 10 points – 37% favorable to 27%. Yet, as Biden struggles to finish his thoughts, and while he's accused of losing all bowel control at key moments, it's now a foregone conclusion Joe won't run again.
Having dodged the border crisis, and normally found wherever there is no spotlight, Kamala has been a bain to Biden by refusing to pay any dividends for his betting on her. Harris avoided the Afghanistan debacle while filming a NASA commercial with kid actors. The result was another towering Kamala failure. She's now like a boxing ringer whose sole purpose is to provide an always predictable knockout for a real fighter. But now it's reported by CNN that Kamala is being dissed by Joe, which would kinda be like a feral dog beaten by a homeless man for not being house-broken.
So, one can only imagine a setting where Secy Transport Pete Buttiege is seen as a rising star. His astonishing abandonment of his post for months of Maternity Leave during an unprecedented supply chain crisis would have seemingly ruined any other high federal official. And yet his gay/veteran/Rhode Scholar resume' seems to have attracted coddling by a functionally inert and utterly indulgent mainstream media. So now the question remains, Does this lovable, rising star Dem, with the pinch of fairy dust and a smile like Alfred E. Neuman, have the cojones to brawl with the disaffected and star-crossed first Black, female VP?
Of course, the answer to this probably won't matter, anyway, given the unprecedented failure ol' Joe is brewing up daily. For, few are interested in the trivia question – Who was the best member of the worst administration in American history?
4.42K
views
Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Analysis on Murder Charge
Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Analysis on Murder Charges
Having paid any attention to WI State's Murder Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse, what percent of viewers believe him guilty of first degree murder? Well, and this might come as a shock – it all depends upon your political persuasion. But, putting aside one's party, it's obvious WI State has some serious problems getting a Murder conviction on Kyle. This is why they asked that lesser charges be considered.
The following are Kyle's charges:
Count 1: First-degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
Count 2: First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
Count 3: First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
Count 4: First-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
The reason WI State will not get Kyle on First Degree Murder can be summarized easily. First, none of the killings by Rittenhouse appears premeditated, or decided upon before the act – a prerequisite for Murder 1. Second, he was also provoked. In all the killings he reacted to parties moving to grab his gun and other actions, like being hit with a heavy object. Joseph Rosenbaum actually stated he wanted to kill Kyle and others, before chasing him and grabbing at his rifle: “He screamed, 'If I catch any of you f---ers alone, I’m going to f------ kill you," & "He said, 'I'm going to cut your f------ hearts out.' " & "I never wanted to shoot Mr. Rosenbaum. He was chasing me. I was alone, he threatened to kill me earlier in that night. I didn't want to have to shoot him." Angry and self-righteous convicted child sodomist Rosenbaum went up to the patriots stating, “Shoot me, n*****, shoot me!!”
Anthony Huber sprinted from the curb towards Kyle then tried to slam his head with a large skateboard, before grabbing at his gun, only to then be shot once. Gaige Grosskreutz simultaneously approached Kyle, grabbed at his rifle, then pulled a pistol and stuck it in his face. “In a video showing the moments just before the shooting, Grosskreutz can be seen crouched over with his hands in the air. Rittenhouse said he’d been attacked by several people by that point and believed Grosskreutz “decided to come and point a gun at my head.” ” Now, to get a feel for how the Wisconsin Statutes reads on these law (with some parts excised):
WI CODE 940.01 First-degree intentional homicide.
(1) Offenses.
(a) Except as provided in sub. (2), whoever causes the death of another human being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class A felony.
(2) Mitigating circumstances. The following are affirmative defenses to prosecution under this section which mitigate the offense to 2nd-degree intentional homicide under s. 940.05:
(a) Adequate provocation. Death was caused under the influence of adequate provocation as defined in s. 939.44.
(b) Unnecessary defensive force. Death was caused because the actor believed he or she or another was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that the force used was necessary to defend the endangered person, if either belief was unreasonable.
(c) Prevention of felony. Death was caused because the actor believed that the force used was necessary in the exercise of the privilege to prevent or terminate the commission of a felony, if that belief was unreasonable.
(d) Coercion; necessity. Death was caused in the exercise of a privilege under s. 939.45 (1).
(3) Burden of proof. When the existence of an affirmative defense under sub. (2) has been placed in issue by the trial evidence, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the facts constituting the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of guilt under sub. (1).
940.02 First-degree reckless homicide.
(1) Whoever recklessly causes the death of another human being under circumstances which show utter disregard for human life is guilty of a Class B felony.
Generally, to illegally commit a crime, a person must seek to do so, or be so negligent or reckless, that the outcome is not unlikely. For a defense, a problem with proving all the elements of the crime must arise, or a legal defense must be established. For example, a legal defense to murder is plausible self-defense.
Now to convict a defendant, a prosecutor should “prove beyond a reasonable doubt” that the person most likely did the crime accused. This standard is well above a preponderance of evidence of the civil trial, which just demands a 51% odds. Fascinatingly, the origin of the idea behind, 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' came from an medieval English Society that was so Christian-minded that they resisted judging anyone, so as not to bring down God's judgment upon themselves. See The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial.
But when Rittenhouse's trial commenced, it became clear early that WI State could not prove any premeditation for Kyle. Further, it then became disastrously obvious that the one living person shot by Rittenhouse – Gaige Grosskreutz, admitted he was shot by Kyle only after pointing a pistol at him. And for Huber, he hit him with a skateboard before trying to wrest away his arms. Then Rosenbaum, child rapist – bragged he would murder Kyle. So all the “victims” of Kyle had either assaulted him or bragged of seeking his murder. And all that is needed is for Kyle to have reasonably felt his life was in danger and so to save himself he would be justified to respond with deadly force.
Now, regarding the fact Defense allowed Rittenhouse to testify, it was a great decision. Rittenhouse came across as honest, smart, thoughtful and regretful for what he felt he had to do. He also had clearly thought through his actions, and how his testimony came across was compelling. Undoubtedly any lesser crimes will also be made much less likely because of Kyle's winning testimony.
What is normally overlooked his how often juries come to conclusions in cases. Much like deciding on whether you like a person you meet, juries also hone in on whether they feel the accused is a nice person or is sympathetic. This can give the edge to a close trial. In this case, Kyle seemed honest, earnest and good-hearted, and this will no doubt play very well with whether his testimony was believed. It seems when you combine good facts and testimony for Kyle and bad facts and horrible admissions by the State's witnesses, it almost seems like a slam-dunk for Rittenhouse. But the jury has their own secrets and logic, and we can't assume anything until the last juror shares their verdict.
6.02K
views
Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Analysis on Murder Charges
*NOTE* SAME PODCAST REDONE ABOVE WITH LOUD MUSIC REMOVED -- Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Analysis on Murder Charges
Having paid any attention to WI State's Murder Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse, what percent of viewers believe him guilty of first degree murder? Well, and this might come as a shock – it all depends upon your political persuasion. But, putting aside one's party, it's obvious WI State has some serious problems getting a Murder conviction on Kyle. This is why they asked that lesser charges be considered.
The following are Kyle's charges:
Count 1: First-degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
Count 2: First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
Count 3: First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
Count 4: First-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
The reason WI State will not get Kyle on First Degree Murder can be summarized easily. First, none of the killings by Rittenhouse appears premeditated, or decided upon before the act – a prerequisite for Murder 1. Second, he was also provoked. In all the killings he reacted to parties moving to grab his gun and other actions, like being hit with a heavy object. Joseph Rosenbaum actually stated he wanted to kill Kyle and others, before chasing him and grabbing at his rifle: “He screamed, 'If I catch any of you f---ers alone, I’m going to f------ kill you," & "He said, 'I'm going to cut your f------ hearts out.' " & "I never wanted to shoot Mr. Rosenbaum. He was chasing me. I was alone, he threatened to kill me earlier in that night. I didn't want to have to shoot him." Angry and self-righteous convicted child sodomist Rosenbaum went up to the patriots stating, “Shoot me, n*****, shoot me!!”
Anthony Huber sprinted from the curb towards Kyle then tried to slam his head with a large skateboard, before grabbing at his gun, only to then be shot once. Gaige Grosskreutz simultaneously approached Kyle, grabbed at his rifle, then pulled a pistol and stuck it in his face. “In a video showing the moments just before the shooting, Grosskreutz can be seen crouched over with his hands in the air. Rittenhouse said he’d been attacked by several people by that point and believed Grosskreutz “decided to come and point a gun at my head.” ” Now, to get a feel for how the Wisconsin Statutes reads on these law (with some parts excised):
WI CODE 940.01 First-degree intentional homicide.
(1) Offenses.
(a) Except as provided in sub. (2), whoever causes the death of another human being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class A felony.
(2) Mitigating circumstances. The following are affirmative defenses to prosecution under this section which mitigate the offense to 2nd-degree intentional homicide under s. 940.05:
(a) Adequate provocation. Death was caused under the influence of adequate provocation as defined in s. 939.44.
(b) Unnecessary defensive force. Death was caused because the actor believed he or she or another was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that the force used was necessary to defend the endangered person, if either belief was unreasonable.
(c) Prevention of felony. Death was caused because the actor believed that the force used was necessary in the exercise of the privilege to prevent or terminate the commission of a felony, if that belief was unreasonable.
(d) Coercion; necessity. Death was caused in the exercise of a privilege under s. 939.45 (1).
(3) Burden of proof. When the existence of an affirmative defense under sub. (2) has been placed in issue by the trial evidence, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the facts constituting the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of guilt under sub. (1).
940.02 First-degree reckless homicide.
(1) Whoever recklessly causes the death of another human being under circumstances which show utter disregard for human life is guilty of a Class B felony.
Generally, to illegally commit a crime, a person must seek to do so, or be so negligent or reckless, that the outcome is not unlikely. For a defense, a problem with proving all the elements of the crime must arise, or a legal defense must be established. For example, a legal defense to murder is plausible self-defense.
Now to convict a defendant, a prosecutor should “prove beyond a reasonable doubt” that the person most likely did the crime accused. This standard is well above a preponderance of evidence of the civil trial, which just demands a 51% odds. Fascinatingly, the origin of the idea behind, 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' came from an medieval English Society that was so Christian-minded that they resisted judging anyone, so as not to bring down God's judgment upon themselves. See The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial.
But when Rittenhouse's trial commenced, it became clear early that WI State could not prove any premeditation for Kyle. Further, it then became disastrously obvious that the one living person shot by Rittenhouse – Gaige Grosskreutz, admitted he was shot by Kyle only after pointing a pistol at him. And for Huber, he hit him with a skateboard before trying to wrest away his arms. Then Rosenbaum, child rapist – bragged he would murder Kyle. So all the “victims” of Kyle had either assaulted him or bragged of seeking his murder. And all that is needed is for Kyle to have reasonably felt his life was in danger and so to save himself he would be justified to respond with deadly force.
Now, regarding the fact Defense allowed Rittenhouse to testify, it was a great decision. Rittenhouse came across as honest, smart, thoughtful and regretful for what he felt he had to do. He also had clearly thought through his actions, and how his testimony came across was compelling. Undoubtedly any lesser crimes will also be made much less likely because of Kyle's winning testimony.
What is normally overlooked his how often juries come to conclusions in cases. Much like deciding on whether you like a person you meet, juries also hone in on whether they feel the accused is a nice person or is sympathetic. This can give the edge to a close trial. In this case, Kyle seemed honest, earnest and good-hearted, and this will no doubt play very well with whether his testimony was believed. It seems when you combine good facts and testimony for Kyle and bad facts and horrible admissions by the State's witnesses, it almost seems like a slam-dunk for Rittenhouse. But the jury has their own secrets and logic, and we can't assume anything until the last juror shares their verdict.
6.04K
views
Rittenhouse Trial Fails: Bad Facts, Gross Errors & Innocent Defendant
Rittenhouse Prosecution Will Fail on Bad Facts, Gross Errors & Innocent Defendant
Introduction: In an instance where reality obliterated fake news reporting from our mainstream media – MSM, Kyle Rittenhouse's prosecution has played out like a child's simple theory of right and wrong. Meanwhile, against the perverse coverage of the MSM, who always omit and miss-characterize stories they dislike, when not openly lying, the truth emerged. Kyle was always the victim in this manhunt. And it's astonishing how a crowd immediately morphed into an execution unit ready for frontier justice without a single fact proved to them, or any due process, but ready to execute a stranger on the spot.
Trial Exposes a Nation of Radical Leftists: A Woke Army, Ready to Slay for the Cause
Rosenbaum, Pedophile: On the fateful night of the protests, August 25, 2020, Kyle vowed to help keep peace at the Jacob Blake protests. Kyle's first encounter was with bald Joseph Rosenbaum, who came advocating racial justice. Looking the young Richard Dreyfuss, but acting out DeNiro's Taxi Driver, he was there for action. Twisted Rosenbaum, just released by a psychiatric hospital, saw libertarian peacemakers carrying weapons. Instantly offended, he waltzed up, a pretend martyr, demanding to be shot. Ignored, he then began hunting conservatives.
Joseph, Murder Threat: Spying Rittenhouse, he announced he'd like to murder him. Joseph then chased Kyle, grabbing the younger man's rifle until the spooked lad spun and shot him. Sow the wind and reap a whirlwind! Sadly, the confused Rosenbaum, a convicted child molestor and boy sodomist, felt himself a savior, but was not on his prescribed bipolar medicine that night, admits his girlfriend. His pharmacy was boarded up. We shouldn't be shocked how many liberal activists labor under mental health diagnoses. Yet, the lost Rosenbaum was just following his new woke religion.
Kyle Running: Screams rang out, “Get him, get that dude! Buss him! He just shot someone!” filled the night air. Rittenhouse was now chased down the boulevard by a dozen Social Justice Warrior wanna-be killers. Sensing the burgeoning melee, Kyle trotted in the center of the road as one member swung and knocked his hat off. Picking up speed to avoid the growing pack, Kyle tripped, and went down. Then the first running guy tried to jump onto his head, so Kyle shot at him twice, but missed and he left.
Huber, Radical Skater: Simultaneously, Kyle was set upon by hoodie'd skateboarder Anthony Huber. A violent redhead who followed his own leftist beliefs, who dashed from the curb and tried to brain him with his board, then grabbed at his rifle, but stumbled as the target moved. Kyle rolled and shot him next, and the skateboarder knelt, fell and lay bleeding-out in the dark. CNN reports,
“Anthony Huber was armed with nothing but his skateboard when he spotted an armed person among a crowded street in Kenosha, Wisconsin, but he still ran toward the danger, his girlfriend says. "He pushed me out of the way, like he was telling me to run off, and I tried to grab him," Hannah Gittings told CNN. "I should have been there, but there was going to be no changing his mind. He did a heroic thing.””
Gaige, Would-be Killer: Immediately after, another rioter then approached Kyle, reaching to grab his gun. As Kyle pulled back his rifle, Gaige Grosskreutz pulled out a pistol, pointing it in Kyle's face, who then shot him, severing his bicep. (Later, during trial testimony, a seemingly mesmerized Gaige repeatedly admitted Defense's theory of the case was correct, obliterating any chance for conviction.)
Then rioters stopped approaching Kyle, so he picked himself up and started walking again. As police riot units approached, Kyle raised his hands, but they just hurried by.
MSM Fake News: And so played out a major morality tale outlined by the MSM. They used their typical deceptions, demonization, stale moralizing and tricks to persuade us that an angry Aryan youth went out to murder leftists with an evil gun and ended killing peaceful anti-racism protesters. Yet this trial almost immediately obliterated this trite and smug picture of the events.
Marxist Street Fighters: This woke, Marxian Humanist religion developed a call for street activism. Recall, when the obscene, large-mouthed Maxine Waters instructed her followers to confront Trump's administration:
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” Waters said at the Wilshire Federal Building, according to video of the event.
Humanist Religion: This woke religion is not biblical, but anti-Christian. It demands revenge and permits lying to serve the higher purpose. And the fascinating thing is that it is the non religious and atheists who long to take part in this group movement, because it is a crippled idea without any redeeming qualities. Undoubtedly part of their motivation is the idea of purging their sins to take part in sanctified activities. Accordingly, they have an opportunity to assume the mantle of the righteous and fight declared evils.
True Partisans: Carl Schmitt, in his Theory of the Partisan, details how political partisanship takes on the nature of the “illegal resistance fighter and underground activist.” We detect this quite regularly as the Democrat party will go to any lengths to win, for example creating a fake Russian dossier on Trump, or using myriad topics as stalking horses to draw closer to the goal. Such as Global Warming, anti-racism, virus policies, etc, etc. Their final goal is nothing short of total destruction of the opposition to force all into world utopia. A fate worse than death in historical results.
Neo Paganism: As a pagan belief system, this false faith is a works based religion. And the mentally weak and psychically ill are sucked into these nonsensical morality tales which call out miscreants and launch into wars for revenge. The latter is waged against persons and organizations of any not seen as sufficiently liberal or woke, or rejecting the sanctified shibboleths. We've seen these crazed leftist groups recently attacking Dem Senators Manchin and Sinema, revealing how true is the observation, the radical mob always devours its own.
Failed Prosecution: Now, because an inherently weak case damaged by mistakes, the State of Wisconsin has no credible chance of gaining a fair conviction. We may get a Directed Verdict or a Mistrial. But if the jury made an emotional decision, or more likely – they voted to convict out of a perceived desire to avoid threat or attack after an acquittal, the Defense can file a motion for Judgment Not Withstanding the Verdict. JNOV: “This motion argues that no reasonable jury could reach the verdict that the jury in this case just did. In other words, it claims that the jury did not follow proper instructions and ruled for the opposing party based on legally insufficient evidence.” But this case will be overturned on conviction by the appeals court, should it ever get that far. And the MSM will never learn a single lesson from yet another professional debacle.
7.96K
views
Democrat Desperation Revealed in Pete Buttiege Vetting for Prez 2024
Biden & Kamala are More Toasted to a Crisp Than Downtown Hiroshima, Circa WWII
Trying to survive their bizarre marriage to deranged rent-a-puppet Biden & his Runaway Veep Kamala, Dems now hang their hopes on an unlikely Pete Buttiege presidency to save them. Yet, just this week, Pete described US roads and highways as designed for racist purposes. Huh? The implication is that these roads need to be...”deconstructed.”
Transport Secy Peter Pan is being suggested as president, despite going AWOL to rush home for months-long Maternity Leave while the Fed Govt struggles to solve the US supply-chain crisis. Meanwhile, an ominous biopic, Mayor Pete, is just released, revealing a soul so lost and thirsty for acceptance that every step is stage managed harder than Jackson 5 dance routines. Is this the best Dems can hope for?
One prays Bootyegg doesn't suffer similar explosive dysentery and gas that Biden unloaded at point-blank-range upon our unsuspecting foreign allies this past week. Hilariously, one cannot find Pete's height anywhere online, only adding to his tiny impression and unfortunate resemblance to Mad Magazine's icon Alfred E Neuman. If elected, will the Mainstream Media insist on filming Bootyegg standing on milk crates, like diminutive 'Shane' star Alan Ladd? Peter Pan is no more a fitting choice for president than would be “journalist” and Trump hunter Jim Acosta.
Democrats are not merely at war against Republicans, but vie against Nature and reality itself. Will America actually vote for a small, lovable gay man, his upstanding husband, and their ready-made infants – for the US presidency? In the secret voting booth, where none can judge, will the hounded and cursed average American really embrace another unlikely ad-hoc, shotgun marriage of convenience? Will we then privately salute the Woke agenda in every manner and seven-ways from Sunday?!!
How long do Democrats plan on challenging everything Americans have ever known, and all our traditional values? More to the point, why does the liberal fetish seem to be only change? That the only constant is a demand for constant variety, without demand for excellence? As we've already seen this year, that's how our leadership is debased until we are simply reduced to slaves of the deified state.
Consider how many ways liberals refuse to accept obvious truths of our existence, believing: The universe created itself, there is no God; Evolution means there is no human nature, we are meat robots; Weakness creates peace; The earth is dying & must be saved at any cost; Capitalism is evil, but taxes delicious; Humans are naturally good, so dangerous felons must be released, and homeless may camp wherever they like.
That unlimited deficit spending won’t hurt the economy: Unlimited numbers of illegal entries can’t harm USA; Humanism must supplant false religion: Communism is beautiful and benefits everyone. Children only need a mom, yet fatherless kids grow into angry urchins; Feminists say women are victims which causes perpetual gender wars; Gender is all in the mind, with 40 variations -- so genitals are irrelevant, and kids confused, as many transition, yet none seem happy, etc.
It seems unlikely Peter Pan Bootyegg gets elected US president, simply because Americans are now wary of Democrat's reckless leadership, destructive impulses and mindless “bucket list” offerings. Instead, reckless policies and relentless anti-American leadership will have the US in the ICU when Democrats get kicked out of power. And it's going to take more than just being trendy to fix what deeply ails us. Fiat Lux, dear fellow patriots!
2.35K
views
Incontinent Biden Strikes Out Again
Joe Biden's Crisis of Incontinence
Biden's Overseas Flatulence Obscures Much Bigger Problems
Recent internet hi-jinks portray Joe Biden across the ocean in various scenes displaying an unrestrained gastrointestinal tract in gross violation of the social contract. Biden went to the Vatican and reportedly soiled himself during his visit with the Pope, and had to change his suit. Then, Biden met Prince Charles and wife Camilla who afterward ironically commented that Joe had indelicately passed a superfluity of methane at the COP26 Climate Summit in Glasgow.
Stated one source:
“He is supposed to be committed to reducing emissions – but when President Joe Biden produced a little natural gas of his own at the COP26 summit, it was audible enough to make the Duchess of Cornwall blush. An informed source has told The Mail on Sunday that Camilla was taken aback to hear Biden break wind as they made polite small talk at the global climate change gathering in Glasgow last week. 'It was long and loud and impossible to ignore,' the source said. 'Camilla hasn't stopped talking about it.' ”
What are we to make of this news? First, it seems believable, although the papal angle is probably apocryphal. Second, that Joe has lost much social cache around the globe because of his inane and graceless shtick. But third, Joe's real scandal of “incontinence” is his failing mental acumen.
Our Joe Biden has been wildly incontinent since he entered office 10 months ago. A Incontinence is defined as, a : unable to voluntarily control retention of urine or feces in the body; B (1) : lacking self-restraint (2) : not being under control.
Now quite obviously, Joe Biden is not in control of himself. For example, Joe was recently asked if – as his staff announced – he was planning on donating 1/2 million dollars to every illegal separated from their family? This idea was so absurd, that even Biden, in full blown mental decline, rejected it, stating “That is not going to happen.” But, later that same day, when asked again about the cash donations to separated illegals, a highly emotional Biden furiously affirmed the idea. So it's obvious Biden doesn't draft his own policies, but has them dictated to him everyday. Further, even the most “garbage” policies are accepted by Joe after a scolding, followed by warm milk and cookies, and nap time.
But the point is that Joe Biden, reeling from one disaster to another, punctuated by repeated claims of fecal malarkey, to employ a Bidenesque phrase, has a troubled history of incontinence. So how long will the Democrats continue to foist this angry, emotional and crazed politician upon America? Well, just released polls show Biden with 37.8% support, a new low. Further, two-thirds – or 63% of Americans now say they don't want ol' incontinent Joe to run for office again. Yet, with Kamala Harris' 28% approval, the Dems are on a voyage of the damned headed for Angel Falls and its mile-high drop.
11.8K
views
2
comments
GOP Must Punish Dems After Retaking Power
GOP Must Commit to Punishing Leftist Lawbreakers to Return USA to Health
It’s getting time for Judgement Day. For all the wayward liberals. Yes, I understand that nobody likes an ominous scene or an angry person, always demanding retribution. But we can no longer abide all the illegal and evil deeds of the power mad and vindictive Democrats.
See Proverbs 17:15 “He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous, Both of them alike are an abomination to the Lord.”
So, when power is returned to the GOP these reprobates and law breakers must be called out, publicly excoriated, given a trial and then sentenced. This includes the highest elected Dem leaders, including the mad egotist Nancy Pelosi, who apparently loves insider trading.
Why do we have to pick up this burden of judgment and punishment? Because, without a fear of punishment, many liberal Democrats will do incredibly destructive and crazy things to try and gain permanent power. In fact, we are just passing through such a time where the entire Democrat establishment spent five years dissembling and building giant masterworks of calumny based on sheer invention.
See Psalm 28:4 “Requite them according to their work and according to the evil of their practices; Requite them according to the deeds of their hands; Repay them their recompense.”
And apparently, all those who lied to assemble the Russia Hoax felt fully justified in everything they did. So to return safety and sanity to the American government, and teach wrongdoers a lesson, all must receive some kind of sanction. Another reason Democrats must be punished is to remind them we live in a society of rules, which if removed, destroy any opportunity for peace, success or moderate rule.
See Psalm 34:21 “Evil shall slay the wicked, And those who hate the righteous will be condemned.”
We must now address a terrible fact. This is that most leftists admit they don’t believe in a biblical God and therefore reject the Ten Commandments, etc. The real danger from this is it makes every man or woman, with all their biases, shortcomings, envy, and greed, their own god. Because there is nobody else around to establish right from wrong.
Most worrisome, it is within human nature to naturally believe that what we want is also good. Therefore, a cadre of atheists especially must be shown the scourge, stockades and prison while demanding they curb their nihilistic impulses to take their place in a proper and fair society.
See Ecclesiastes 8:14 “There is a futility that is done on the earth: There are righteous men who get what the actions of the wicked deserve, and there are wicked men who get what the actions of the righteous deserve. I say that this too is futile.”
Now, had the Senate and House had a proper investigation after the Russia Hoax, Democrats may not have then decided to unleash a yearlong orgy of rioting, race-baiting and law breaking. Instead, they would have believed that any support of illegality would be investigated, regardless of the party involved. But now we have skyrocketing crime across the US as a result. And if Governors Cuomo and Widmar believed their sending Covid patients into rest homes, killing over 40,000 would be prosecuted, they probably would not have done so. And if Joe Biden believed he would be impeached for allowing 3 million illegals into America, he might have kept Tump’s rules in order. Etc.
See Ecclesiastes 8:10-11 “Then too, I saw the burial of the wicked who used to go in and out of the holy place, and they were praised in the city where they had done so. This too is futile. When the sentence for a crime is not speedily executed, the hearts of men become fully set on doing evil.”
So now the GOP must see their quick retaking of power as a strange fluke based upon the Dem’s crazy roll of the dice, running 2 incompetent candidates just to beat Trump. And then placing into prominent positions one incompetent fanatic after another. So, the result was a quick and dirty win and then slow death by a thousand stupid decisions, one after another.
See Isaiah 13:11 “Thus I will punish the world for its evil
And the wicked for their iniquity;
I will also put an end to the arrogance of the proud
And abase the haughtiness of the ruthless.”
But have no doubt this was actually a miracle, a last chance offered by God to take our country back, to destroy the Democrat party, to completely expose the evil of Marxism, and to save our great land. So let’s not be afraid to directly confront evil, but instead let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work while the light still shines, and re-establish good in America while evil is clearly discredited and sanctioned.
9.78K
views
1
comment
What Happens Now for Dems After VA Election Disaster?
Liberals tremble pondering VA Dem Governor candidate ‘McAwful’ McAuliffe being cornered, neutralized and discarded like a gopher trapped underground with a water hose blasting his hole. But what does yesterday’s results in NJ & VA mean? And what does the future now hold for Democrats? The future is not bright for reasons elucidated here.
First, there is now fated to be many more election nightmares for Dems in formerly solid liberal zones. The reason is simple. First, the American people are scared, confused and angry at Democrat choices since Joe Biden shambled into office.This results from the lunatic left being let off their chains and allowed to roam free.
And second, that Americans are now in a mood for revenge. They are tired of being lectured to and lied about, and insulted on a daily basis. For example, in AG Merrick Garland’s shambolic congressional testimony, he brazenly lied literally dozens or more times. Fair minded citizens listened and realized in his faux-naive answers that he was dissembling. Garland lied about such fanciful facts as his only being able to learn of US crises by CNN. But by his audacious lies he challenges anyone man enough to call him out on it.
As The Stench From Their Spectacular Wrecks Pile Higher, More Bloodletting to Follow
Third, there are so many man-made disasters currently spawned by this administration that a voter-induced bloodletting is in order to demand attention of this ship of fools. Between illegal millions entering the USA, wild spikes in fuel costs & beggin OPEC for more, the Afghanistan catastrophe, taxes and inflation spiraling, covid orders spawning labor shortages -- including fed led firings, spiking violent crime, constant race-baiting, children not in schools, broken supply chains, etc, Americans are battered. Citizens know that this savage and brutal administration means the death of the Republic, and so they are fighting back to save America.
Finally, and most important, the plain fact is these ideological partisans do not have the ability to ratchet down their constant demands for more socialism. They confuse ideological purity with creating a better world. The Nod Squad, led by hairbrained Marxist AOC, is set to block any spending bill that does not grant all their demands. Because even these mindless radicals realize the clock is ticking and their chance probably won’t come again. And so between them, Sen Manchin, and our Punch Drunk President in Chief, unkle joe, the Dems goose is cooked.
The inevitable must now occur because enough well-meaning Americans see through the leftist blather to the Heart of Darkness pulsating beneath the chest of all true Marxists. And so, because of unrelenting, wild leftism and ceaseless failure, Americans will continue rejecting Democrats, returning power to the GOP. Then the question becomes, on their way back from the wilderness -- Will Americans embrace Donald Trump again? And, Will they finally punish the lawless Democrats after years of felony assaults against our Republic? Or as Sen. Cotton warned Democrat colleagues today, that if they didn’t change their crazy antics now, “The chill you will feel next year is the voters walking over your graves.”
5.18K
views
2
comments
Atty Gen Garland's Incompetence Meant as a Bouquet of Weeds for America’s Funeral
Why is Atty Gen Merrick Purposefully Destroying His Own Reputation?
*WARNING – THE FOLLOWING ANALYSIS IS UNNERVING* For every one of the Biden Administration’s incompetent officials offering poorly made decisions and subsequent disasters – there is a reason behind the madness. Realize that leftists are convinced they can’t achieve power without subterfuge, dissembling and man-made catastrophes. Their idea of total government domination, already rejected by Gen George Washington and the Colonists, has no support in USA. So, to win they joyfully launch a strategic coup, engaging in what they believe is the most sacred act of leadership – revolution. The chess playing of Marx pitted against the checkers of Adam Smith, goes their theory.
Such dreary gamesmanship results from their humanistic and Gnostic (gnaw-sticks) atheism, asserting a small, select caste are destined to save humanity through dedication and genius. And so each member assumes a role. In Merrick Garland’s case, he’s volunteered for the part of a doddering old man who can’t make good decisions because he's . In his self-satisfied indolence he researches America via CNN, so won’t think for himself. Like the infamous movie Human Centipede, Garland is attached to Biden’s gluteus like a favored parasite.
We’ve descended into Kafka’s ‘Trial,’ where a secret collusion exists for power. Here, countless government stooges collude against the defendants, as confusion dominates, and communication ceases while total incompetence reins. Due process becomes a fiction. The accused is America itself. We the People are the hated plebs, the great unwashed, the morons of capitalism, despised by the elites who must be scrubbed from society so planet earth may survive while utopia is finally instituted.
Garland’s claim that America’s Parents are more dangerous than Antifa, BLM, Muslim terrorists, millions of illegals, or spiking violent crime rates is nonsensical obsequiousness to socialist plans. It was astounding theater when Sen’s Cruz and Hawley confronted incompetent Garland on his facts, who admitted he hadn’t checked the theory of Parents as Dangerous Subversives. He then asserted fact-checking would be correctly done after new FBI rules were already established to pursue parental terrorists in the meantime. Garland came across like a man with no particle training were chosen off a city street and then appointed as AG without any experience or special knowledge. Ludicrous.
Priceless was Garland being grilled over if the ethics guy was asked if his family’s business teaching Critical Race Theory could be seen as a conflict. Meanwhile, Merrick blubbered he couldn't be suspected of bias, regardless of any details, seeming so pedestrian and naive. We detect in this family the incestuous family aspect of Leftist indoctrination where one generation injects the next with the virus of mindless Marxism. Similar to Pete Buttiege’s father as an expert in Italian Marxist Gramsci, most important socialist authority of today. No wonder Secy Transport Peter Pan is a first class rebel!
Overall, America is in desperate straights, and we must prepare for even worse depredations and insane policies than we've seen these last 9 months. Let's consider ourselves lucky to live at a crucial time to resist true enemies threatening human society and liberty. As Churchill wrote for his Never Give In, Never, Never, Never Speech: “Do not let us speak of darker days: let us speak rather of sterner days. These are not dark days; these are great days — the greatest days our country has ever lived; and we must all thank God that we have been allowed, each of us according to our stations, to play a part in making these days memorable in the history of our race.”
31
views
VA GOV: Terry McAwful’s Racist Anti-Trump Campaign Loses
SHATTERED: Clinton Wraith McAuliffe Loses VA Gov Race
In an astounding setback, former VA governor and Bill Clinton money-man Terry “McAwful” McAuliffe was trounced by unknown GOP Glenn Youngkin in the VA Nov 2 race. An increasingly panicky McAwful stumbled while admitting VA parents had no status regarding their children’s education. In an age of outrageous Dem race-baiting, disillusioned VA voters rejected statism and mentally incompetent Joe Biden’s disastrous reign.
Terry McAwful’s Race Baiting Campaign Goes Down in Flames
Likewise, New Jersey voters telegraphed admonition to condescending former Goldman Sachs banker Phil Murphy by backing GOP Jack Ciattarelli. Phil -- the personal embodiment of “Murphy’s Law” -- promised to increase woke policies. Overall, Americans are frustrated, angry and scared by the Biden Admin’s crazily socialist policies, which created numerous concurrent disasters. With no Trump around to blame, Dems finally exposed their anti-American bias and stunningly disastrous policies.
And with Joe Biden, reduced to calling out reporter’s names from high school yearbook-styled sheets, and unable to form whole sentences, the Dems are in a quandary, gagging on grandpa Joe.
The moral of yesterday’s lesson? Be careful what you wish for, Dems. And is Nancy Pelosi our Lady Macbeth -- Queen of the Damned? A perfect ending to Nancy’s pompous story would be her retiring into Federal Prison. Impossible, you say? Well, with upcoming GOP majorities in the House & Senate, many options open up. And, stranger things have happened to insider trading specialists like Nancy & Paul Pelosi.
6.07K
views
CRITICAL RACE THEORY: INTRODUCTION
CRITICAL RACE THEORY
Question – Would you be offended, or just confused if someone you'd never met called you an untrustworthy race bigot based upon just your skin color? That crazy concept used to be employed by the KKK But now the Critical Race Theory people are taking over and it's supposed to be in every debate and law and educational system till we throw out all the racist institutions. But what is it? No book completely lays it out – so I'm going to sum it up for you. But understand it's very bad, can't redeem anything and could end up causing a race war in America. Yes, it's that bad.
Where is it from & who invented it?
The phrase Critical Theory comes from the Frankfurt School of Germany which relocated to America in the 1930s to avoid destruction by Hitler. The phrase represents the need to destroy all Western institutions, arguing “that man could not be objective and that there are no universal truths.” Law is intertwined with social issues, and inherently favors the interests of the established power structure. Derrick Bell then developed CRT to it's current state.
1. Race is the ultimate reality, so all Society must be viewed through this prism;
2. The White Race has subjugated all other races historically;
3. Master & slave is the paradigm representing a Marxist worldview;
4. Since racism was at the beginning, all institutions are racist;
5. American law is racist, including the Constitution, Due Process, property rights, etc.;
6. Race is the reason for individual success or failure, not talent, work ethic or character;
7. Institutions must be destroyed and rebuilt to root out the racism;
8. Victims, beaten down for years, needed to be re-educated for a new way of life;
9. Derrick Bell developed CRT and admitted its Marxist basis;
10. As advocates demand increasing concessions, a race war may be the conclusion of this entire.
10
views
Saving Free Speech, One Venue at a Time
Is the Answer to Woke Tyranny Libertarian “Private Cities” & Places?
Each day as we arise we greet a new day even more repressive and tyrannical than yesterday. The latest is Woke, a comedic movement pretending only one opinion exists on any topic and disagreement means you should be ruined.
But our society has been drifting this way for years. Driving this is a deep seated fear in leftists that since their ideas are not natural, they must be reinforced by sanctions and even violence. Or they won't survive another generation – explaining the crazy control the Bolsheviks extended in Russia.
So what is our salvation? New private entities are reinstalling civility and protection across the world. On is Substack, taking journalism private and making big profits by news letters. Ending the impulsive need to punish others for their sins. *
And Private Cities, which are built for maximum profit and safety, which can be extended for liberty of belief, especially popular in Central America and other dysfunctional places. Another suggestion – create large pacts of free-will citizens who agree to solve every non criminal disagreement in private or by arbitration.
No more embarrassing folks by media and ruining their professions, income and social standing. Also, let's build fraternities of non-woke capitalism and corporations where the woke, PVC, Cancel Culture and other forms of leftist revenge cease to exist
3
views
Modern Concubines -- Hoes Destroying Marriage?
Will Destruction of Marriage Lead to Collapse of the West?
Intro: Chastity is Dead—Not long ago, family warnings passed from parent to child on avoiding unwise hookups and dodging defective partners, such as the promiscuous tart. Roman historian Tacitus offered this gem—“A woman who’s lost her chastity will stoop to anything.” Yet now, the category of un-chastity no longer exists since “slut shaming” is immoral—despite female’s sexual history being a statistical premonition of marital longevity. Overall, decline in romantic relationships from the 60’s till now is everywhere obvious. And yet—no element more influences human happiness and productivity than marital stability. Perhaps why, in Proverbs, Solomon spent many chapters warning of the dangers of the immoral woman. Divorce is a huge annihilator of wealth.
Lifelong Love’s Swan Dive:
Is lifelong love anymore an aspiration? Then why keep replaying the traditional marriage vow swearing—“till death do us part,”? Wisdom penned a thousand years ago, now irrelevant. Marriage is abandoned as we trifle with novelty, a ceremony no longer religious. Functionally, women now co-inhabit the same spaces as men. Today, intimate relationships—often cohabitation—are temporary collaborations, averaging 15 months! And in a society where gender itself, let alone marriage, is fluid, we’ve obviously lost the theory of romantic love. It’s no longer discussed in song or society. But doesn’t this imply every yesteryear invocation of ethereal and undying love was simply a mirage? If past generations views on love were a hoax, why did they seem happier than us?
Past Trashed:
Today most feel an enlightened superiority over the past. Females are taught women of the past were chattel and the way forward is to find a career and independence. Marriage is an afterthought. It’s only later that regrets emerge. And if it’s pointed out such a life is not only ephemeral but lacking genuine meaning, the audience blinks in confusion. For a career can never replace permanent unions and children, despite ceaseless propaganda. So why teach default Feminism to young women?
Modern Concubines:
A world evolved where intimacy is pornographic and fleeting, a demimonde where sex is transactional and meaningless. Consider a woman, as a live-in lover, boasts the same basic status as ancient concubines: “A concubine defined by Jewish law was a woman dedicating herself to a particular man, with whom she cohabits without marriage.” The modern relationship is just as unstable, the female sans marital rights, and children produced akin to fly-by-night hostages. Does this modern innovation work? Actually, fatherless children born outside marriage, suffer an astounding litany of ills. (see article for rest)
86
views